A Critique on the Indian Draft Space Activities Bill 2017

IF 0.7 Q4 ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE
Sandeepa Bhat B.
{"title":"A Critique on the Indian Draft Space Activities Bill 2017","authors":"Sandeepa Bhat B.","doi":"10.1089/space.2021.0042","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The regulation of private space activities has become a matter of considerable complexity in the present era of commercialization. The international space treaties fix responsibility and liability for both public and private space activities on the States, and therefore, the States cannot risk allowing the private players to operate without proper regulation. This has led the States to move toward enacting national space legislation to address a plethora of issues involved in regulating private space activities. India has been trying to enact national space legislation since the beginning of the 21st century. With the concerted efforts, it could succeed in preparing a draft Space Activities Bill in 2017. Unfortunately, the 2017 Bill suffers from several inherent loopholes and it also misses out many key aspects, which need to be incorporated in a comprehensive national space law. Hence, the aim of this article is to critically evaluate the 2017 Bill with an objective to highlight the need for a better model in tune with the Indian commitments under international space treaties. Such an endeavor is absolutely required in the wake of present developments to promote private space activities in India to boost its economy in the post-COVID-19 era. © Copyright 2022, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2022.","PeriodicalId":43362,"journal":{"name":"New Space-The Journal of Space Entrepreneurship and Innovation","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"New Space-The Journal of Space Entrepreneurship and Innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1089/space.2021.0042","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, AEROSPACE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The regulation of private space activities has become a matter of considerable complexity in the present era of commercialization. The international space treaties fix responsibility and liability for both public and private space activities on the States, and therefore, the States cannot risk allowing the private players to operate without proper regulation. This has led the States to move toward enacting national space legislation to address a plethora of issues involved in regulating private space activities. India has been trying to enact national space legislation since the beginning of the 21st century. With the concerted efforts, it could succeed in preparing a draft Space Activities Bill in 2017. Unfortunately, the 2017 Bill suffers from several inherent loopholes and it also misses out many key aspects, which need to be incorporated in a comprehensive national space law. Hence, the aim of this article is to critically evaluate the 2017 Bill with an objective to highlight the need for a better model in tune with the Indian commitments under international space treaties. Such an endeavor is absolutely required in the wake of present developments to promote private space activities in India to boost its economy in the post-COVID-19 era. © Copyright 2022, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2022.
对印度2017年空间活动法案草案的批评
在目前的商业化时代,对私人空间活动的管制已成为一个相当复杂的问题。国际空间条约将公共和私人空间活动的责任和义务都定在国家身上,因此,各国不能冒险允许私人参与者在没有适当监管的情况下运作。这使各国朝着颁布国家空间立法的方向迈进,以解决管理私人空间活动所涉及的大量问题。自21世纪初以来,印度一直在努力制定国家空间立法。在各方的共同努力下,它可能会在2017年成功起草一份太空活动法案草案。不幸的是,2017年的法案存在几个固有的漏洞,也遗漏了许多需要纳入全面国家空间法的关键方面。因此,本文的目的是批判性地评估2017年法案,目的是强调需要一个更好的模式,与印度在国际空间条约下的承诺保持一致。鉴于目前的事态发展,促进印度的私人太空活动,以促进后covid -19时代的经济发展,这种努力是绝对必要的。©版权所有2022,玛丽·安·利伯特公司,出版商2022。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
28
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信