Group III Pulmonary Hypertension: relative frequency of different etiologies in a referral pulmonary OPD

P. Bhattacharyya, S. Sengupta, D. Saha, Mintu Paul, Priyanka Choudhury, S. Dasgupta
{"title":"Group III Pulmonary Hypertension: relative frequency of different etiologies in a referral pulmonary OPD","authors":"P. Bhattacharyya, S. Sengupta, D. Saha, Mintu Paul, Priyanka Choudhury, S. Dasgupta","doi":"10.4103/jacp.jacp_3_20","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The prevalence of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in India remains unknown. The literature is scanty from the country regarding different types of PH. The etiological distribution of Group III PH in a pulmonologist’s practice, therefore, will be worthwhile to note. Method: We included patients with pulmonary hypertension following convenience sampling from those been diagnosed with PH in our pulmonary OPD services on the basis of a novel clinico-radio-echocardiographic criteria. They were then evaluated for the apparent and predominant underlying etiology. Patients with clear and defined diagnosis of COPD, asthma, DPLD, OSA and CTEPH were charted along with those having no obvious etiology but a history of treatment of tuberculosis in the past, along with a group marked as the “others” that consisted of a number of known (sarcoidosis, rheumatic heart disease, etc.) and some incompletely evaluated patients. Results: A total of 356 patients were recruited. The relative frequencies have been accounted to 35.81%, 20.66% and 13.77% for COPD, DPLD and asthma respectively. The patients with a history of TB without any other forthcoming etiology formed 12.67% of the group. The patients with OSA and CTEPH accounted for 2.75% of the group and the “Others” group occupied the rest 14.32%. Conclusion: Group III PH is found not infrequent in pulmonary practice and COPD tops the etiological list.","PeriodicalId":30411,"journal":{"name":"The Journal of Association of Chest Physicians","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Journal of Association of Chest Physicians","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jacp.jacp_3_20","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The prevalence of pulmonary hypertension (PH) in India remains unknown. The literature is scanty from the country regarding different types of PH. The etiological distribution of Group III PH in a pulmonologist’s practice, therefore, will be worthwhile to note. Method: We included patients with pulmonary hypertension following convenience sampling from those been diagnosed with PH in our pulmonary OPD services on the basis of a novel clinico-radio-echocardiographic criteria. They were then evaluated for the apparent and predominant underlying etiology. Patients with clear and defined diagnosis of COPD, asthma, DPLD, OSA and CTEPH were charted along with those having no obvious etiology but a history of treatment of tuberculosis in the past, along with a group marked as the “others” that consisted of a number of known (sarcoidosis, rheumatic heart disease, etc.) and some incompletely evaluated patients. Results: A total of 356 patients were recruited. The relative frequencies have been accounted to 35.81%, 20.66% and 13.77% for COPD, DPLD and asthma respectively. The patients with a history of TB without any other forthcoming etiology formed 12.67% of the group. The patients with OSA and CTEPH accounted for 2.75% of the group and the “Others” group occupied the rest 14.32%. Conclusion: Group III PH is found not infrequent in pulmonary practice and COPD tops the etiological list.
第III组肺动脉高压:转诊肺动脉OPD中不同病因的相对频率
背景:印度肺动脉高压(PH)的患病率尚不清楚。国内关于不同类型PH的文献很少。因此,肺科医生实践中第III组PH的病因分布值得注意。方法:我们根据一项新的临床无线电超声心动图标准,从我们的肺部门诊服务中诊断为肺动脉高压的患者中方便地抽取样本,纳入肺动脉高压患者。然后对其明显和主要的潜在病因进行评估。明确诊断为COPD、哮喘、DPLD、OSA和CTEPH的患者,以及那些没有明显病因但过去有结核病治疗史的患者,还有一组被标记为“其他”的患者,包括一些已知的患者(结节病、风湿性心脏病等)和一些未完全评估的患者。结果:共招募356名患者。COPD、DPLD和哮喘的相对频率分别为35.81%、20.66%和13.77%。有结核病病史但没有任何其他病因的患者占该组的12.67%。OSA和CTEPH患者占该组的2.75%,“其他”组占其余14.32%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
20 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信