The Spatiality of Women’s Struggle within Porto’s Residents’ Movement during Portuguese Revolutionary Process (1974-75)

Q4 Engineering

ZARCH Pub Date : 2022-09-02 DOI:10.26754/ojs_zarch/zarch.2022186173

C. Ruivo Pereira

引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper explores the role of women’s struggle within residents’ movements in the production and transformation of space in Porto during the PREC (the Portuguese Revolutionary Process of 1974-1976), analysing the spaces where these movements started, the issues they focused on, and how it related and acted within explicit and implicit views of family and gender relations in institutional approaches to housing development. It also considers how these were mirrored in housing policy options and design paradigms. In this way, by shifting the focus to women’s struggle at the grassroots, looking at those who were both the recipients of houses and actors of an ongoing struggle, this research explores the intersection between class and gender in the processes of housing and urban development.

查看原文本刊更多论文

葡萄牙革命时期波尔图居民运动中女性斗争的空间性(1974- 1975)

本文探讨了PREC（1974-1976年葡萄牙革命进程）期间，妇女在居民运动中的斗争在波尔图空间生产和改造中的作用，分析了这些运动开始的空间、他们关注的问题，以及它如何在住房发展的体制方法中，在家庭和性别关系的显性和隐性观点范围内联系和行动。它还考虑了这些是如何反映在住房政策选择和设计模式中的。通过这种方式，通过将重点转移到妇女在基层的斗争上，观察那些既是住房接受者又是正在进行的斗争参与者的人，这项研究探索了住房和城市发展过程中阶级和性别之间的交叉点。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

ZARCH Engineering-Architecture

CiteScore

0.20

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

22 weeks

期刊介绍： ZARCH adopts a double perspective. Firstly, a global vision, that is international, although with its headquarters in our university and in the Spanish and European sphere, which implies coming to terms that most of the contributions are published in English, even though it seems compatible with a special attention to the Latin languages, not only in Spanish but also in French, Italian, Portuguese and others. Secondly, an interdisciplinary, transversal approximation with integrating visions, starting from the architectural field but open to other disciplines according with the changing limits and situations that today characterize the architecture field and urban studies. This leads us to the acceptance of close disciplines, from social sciences to technical visions, with logic condition of the scientific quality of contributions, previously evaluated by a rigorous system of arbitration. In any case, the Scientific Council''s advice to the magazine, guarantees the rigour and the attention to the standpoints and methodologies more innovative in our fields.