Stackelberg-Nash Equilibrium and Perfect Competition in the Solow-Uzawa Growth Model

IF 0.3 Q4 ECONOMICS
Wei-bin Zhang
{"title":"Stackelberg-Nash Equilibrium and Perfect Competition in the Solow-Uzawa Growth Model","authors":"Wei-bin Zhang","doi":"10.17533/UDEA.LE.N96A342588","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study introduces Stackelberg-Nash equilibrium to neoclassical growth theory. It attempts to make neoclassical economic growth theory more robust in modelling the complexity of market structures. The model is constructed within the framework of the Solow-Uzawa two-sector model. The economy is composed of two sectors. The final goods sector is the same as in the Solow one-sector growth model which is characterized by perfect competition. The consumer goods sector is the same as the consumer goods sector in the Uzawa model but is characterized by Stackelberg duopoly. We model household behavior with Zhang’s concept of disposable income and utility. The model endogenously determines profits of duopoly which are equally distributed among the homogeneous population. We build the model and then identify the existence of an equilibrium point through simulation. We conduct comparative static analyses of some parameters. We also compare the economic performance of the traditional Uzawa model and the model with the Stackelberg-Nash equilibrium. We conclude that the imperfect competition increases national output, national wealth, and utility level in comparison to perfect competition. ","PeriodicalId":52205,"journal":{"name":"Lecturas de Economia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lecturas de Economia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17533/UDEA.LE.N96A342588","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study introduces Stackelberg-Nash equilibrium to neoclassical growth theory. It attempts to make neoclassical economic growth theory more robust in modelling the complexity of market structures. The model is constructed within the framework of the Solow-Uzawa two-sector model. The economy is composed of two sectors. The final goods sector is the same as in the Solow one-sector growth model which is characterized by perfect competition. The consumer goods sector is the same as the consumer goods sector in the Uzawa model but is characterized by Stackelberg duopoly. We model household behavior with Zhang’s concept of disposable income and utility. The model endogenously determines profits of duopoly which are equally distributed among the homogeneous population. We build the model and then identify the existence of an equilibrium point through simulation. We conduct comparative static analyses of some parameters. We also compare the economic performance of the traditional Uzawa model and the model with the Stackelberg-Nash equilibrium. We conclude that the imperfect competition increases national output, national wealth, and utility level in comparison to perfect competition. 
Solow-Uzawa增长模型中的Stackelberg-Nash均衡与完全竞争
本研究将Stackelberg-Nash均衡引入新古典增长理论。它试图使新古典经济增长理论在模拟市场结构的复杂性方面更加稳健。该模型是在索洛-乌泽两部门模型的框架内构建的。经济由两个部门组成。最终产品部门与索洛单部门增长模型相同,其特点是完全竞争。消费品部门与Uzawa模型中的消费品部门相同,但具有Stackelberg双寡头垄断的特征。我们用张的可支配收入和效用概念来模拟家庭行为。该模型内生地决定了双寡头垄断的利润在同质人群中平均分配。建立模型,通过仿真验证平衡点的存在性。我们对一些参数进行了对比静力分析。我们还比较了传统的Uzawa模型和具有Stackelberg-Nash均衡的模型的经济绩效。我们的结论是,与完全竞争相比,不完全竞争增加了国民产出、国民财富和效用水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Lecturas de Economia
Lecturas de Economia Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
23
审稿时长
21 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信