Jacobus Vrel: Looking for Clues of an Enigmatic Painter. Quentin Buvelot, Bernd Ebert, and Cécile Tainturier, eds. Munich: Hirmer, 2021. 256 pp. + color pls. $50.

IF 1.2 1区 历史学 0 MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES
E. Honig
{"title":"Jacobus Vrel: Looking for Clues of an Enigmatic Painter. Quentin Buvelot, Bernd Ebert, and Cécile Tainturier, eds. Munich: Hirmer, 2021. 256 pp. + color pls. $50.","authors":"E. Honig","doi":"10.1017/rqx.2023.218","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"“reflection as an alternative to the sacred materialism of the cult of the saints,” as Price summarizes Erasmian theology (183). One highlight is the infrequently reproduced portrait drawing of Cranach by Dürer, amid discussion of the two artists’ mutual influence on each other and on Reformation visuality: though one may quibble with Price’s word choices, he is right that the distinction lies between promoting a theological truth about scripture (“didactic” Cranach) and promoting attitudes toward scripture (“psychological”Dürer). Price’s reading of Dürer’s 1526 Four Holy Men is also helpful in its emphasis on biblicism as a governmental virtue. The fifth chapter is the best in the book: its key intervention is to showcase Cranach’s underappreciated use of continuity—across traditional and Lutheran art as well as across paint and print media (one might also have added relief sculpture!)—as an authorizing strategy for innovative biblicist iconography. To anchor this point, Price offers generous footnotes: from Luther’s more obscure pronouncements to scholarship on period armor, Price has mastered this context and reframed it. Finally, the final chapter, taking on the trickiest artist of the three, does not bother interrogating Holbein’s Reformation or lack thereof; more usefully, Price establishes how Holbein’s unique forms of attention to biblical detail made his Bible illustrations the industry standard for decades, not just in Lutheran zones. While some may be unconvinced by the coda concerning Holbein’s Christ Dead in the Tomb, it showcases Price’s poetic side as he pits Fyodor Dostoevsky against Pope Francis; I longed for more such moments of free rein in the book. Price regularly invokes details in finely engraved frontispieces and illustrations of books, details crucial to his argument and/or potentially delightful to the reader. The book is charmingly designed, with a hollow typeface printed in red ink for intertitles, recalling incunabula and early sixteenth-century printed bibles without cornily aping the actual typefaces used. The clear writing and convincing argumentation make it perfect for Reformation and Renaissance syllabi as well as an aid to future scholarship.","PeriodicalId":45863,"journal":{"name":"RENAISSANCE QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"RENAISSANCE QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/rqx.2023.218","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

“reflection as an alternative to the sacred materialism of the cult of the saints,” as Price summarizes Erasmian theology (183). One highlight is the infrequently reproduced portrait drawing of Cranach by Dürer, amid discussion of the two artists’ mutual influence on each other and on Reformation visuality: though one may quibble with Price’s word choices, he is right that the distinction lies between promoting a theological truth about scripture (“didactic” Cranach) and promoting attitudes toward scripture (“psychological”Dürer). Price’s reading of Dürer’s 1526 Four Holy Men is also helpful in its emphasis on biblicism as a governmental virtue. The fifth chapter is the best in the book: its key intervention is to showcase Cranach’s underappreciated use of continuity—across traditional and Lutheran art as well as across paint and print media (one might also have added relief sculpture!)—as an authorizing strategy for innovative biblicist iconography. To anchor this point, Price offers generous footnotes: from Luther’s more obscure pronouncements to scholarship on period armor, Price has mastered this context and reframed it. Finally, the final chapter, taking on the trickiest artist of the three, does not bother interrogating Holbein’s Reformation or lack thereof; more usefully, Price establishes how Holbein’s unique forms of attention to biblical detail made his Bible illustrations the industry standard for decades, not just in Lutheran zones. While some may be unconvinced by the coda concerning Holbein’s Christ Dead in the Tomb, it showcases Price’s poetic side as he pits Fyodor Dostoevsky against Pope Francis; I longed for more such moments of free rein in the book. Price regularly invokes details in finely engraved frontispieces and illustrations of books, details crucial to his argument and/or potentially delightful to the reader. The book is charmingly designed, with a hollow typeface printed in red ink for intertitles, recalling incunabula and early sixteenth-century printed bibles without cornily aping the actual typefaces used. The clear writing and convincing argumentation make it perfect for Reformation and Renaissance syllabi as well as an aid to future scholarship.
雅各布·弗瑞尔:寻找神秘画家的线索。昆汀·布洛特,贝恩德·艾伯特和cacciile Tainturier编。慕尼黑:Hirmer, 2021。256页+彩色,50美元。
“反思是对圣人崇拜的神圣唯物主义的一种替代,”正如普莱斯总结伊拉斯谟神学(183)。在讨论两位艺术家对彼此的相互影响以及宗教改革视觉效果的过程中,d雷尔罕见地复制了克拉纳赫的肖像,这是一个亮点:尽管人们可能会对普赖斯的措辞吹毛求疵,但他是正确的,区别在于宣扬关于圣经的神学真理(“说教的”克拉纳赫)和宣扬对圣经的态度(“心理的”d雷尔)。普赖斯对德雷尔1526年的《四个圣人》的解读也很有帮助,因为它强调了圣经是一种政府美德。第五章是这本书中最好的:它的关键介入是展示了克拉纳赫对连续性的使用——在传统和路德艺术中,以及在绘画和印刷媒体中(也可能加上浮雕!)——作为一种创新的圣经肖像学的授权策略。为了巩固这一点,普莱斯提供了慷慨的脚注:从路德更晦涩的宣言到关于时代盔甲的学术研究,普莱斯掌握了这一背景并重新构建了它。最后,最后一章讨论了三位艺术家中最狡猾的一位,并没有质疑霍尔拜因的宗教改革或缺乏宗教改革;更有用的是,普莱斯证明了霍尔拜因对圣经细节的独特关注是如何使他的圣经插图成为几十年来的行业标准的,而不仅仅是在路德教地区。虽然有些人可能不相信霍尔拜因的《基督死在坟墓里》的结尾,但它展示了普莱斯诗意的一面,他让费奥多尔·陀思妥耶夫斯基与教皇弗朗西斯对立;我渴望在书中有更多这样的自由时刻。普莱斯经常在书的扉页和插图中引用细节,这些细节对他的论点至关重要,或者可能会让读者感到愉快。这本书的设计很迷人,中间标题用红色墨水印刷的空心字体,让人想起古古传说和16世纪早期印刷的圣经,而不是模仿实际使用的字体。清晰的文字和令人信服的论证使它成为宗教改革和文艺复兴时期教学大纲的完美选择,也有助于未来的学术研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
RENAISSANCE QUARTERLY
RENAISSANCE QUARTERLY MEDIEVAL & RENAISSANCE STUDIES-
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
16.70%
发文量
108
期刊介绍: Starting with volume 62 (2009), the University of Chicago Press will publish Renaissance Quarterly on behalf of the Renaissance Society of America. Renaissance Quarterly is the leading American journal of Renaissance studies, encouraging connections between different scholarly approaches to bring together material spanning the period from 1300 to 1650 in Western history. The official journal of the Renaissance Society of America, RQ presents twelve to sixteen articles and over four hundred reviews per year.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信