Probing the rotation rate of solar active regions: the comparison of methods

IF 0.5 4区 物理与天体物理 Q4 ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS
A. Kutsenko, V. Abramenko
{"title":"Probing the rotation rate of solar active regions: the comparison of methods","authors":"A. Kutsenko, V. Abramenko","doi":"10.1515/astro-2021-0029","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Sunspot groups are often used as tracers to probe the differential rotation of the Sun. However, the results on the rotation rate variation obtained by different authors are not always in agreement. The reason for this might be a number of effects. In particular, faster decay of the following part of a sunspot group results in a false apparent shift of the area-weighted center of the group toward the leading part. In this work we analyze how significantly this effect may contribute to the derived rotation rate. For a set of 670 active regions, we compare the rotation rate derived from continuum intensity images to that derived from line-of-sight magnetograms. We found that the difference between the calculated rotation rates is 0.45° day−1 on average. This value is comparable to the difference between the rotation rate of the solar surface near the equator and at 30° latitude. We conclude that the accuracy of the rotation rate measurements using white-light images is not satisfactory. Magnetograms should be used in future research on the differential rotation of the Sun.","PeriodicalId":19514,"journal":{"name":"Open Astronomy","volume":"30 1","pages":"219 - 224"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Astronomy","FirstCategoryId":"101","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/astro-2021-0029","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ASTRONOMY & ASTROPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Sunspot groups are often used as tracers to probe the differential rotation of the Sun. However, the results on the rotation rate variation obtained by different authors are not always in agreement. The reason for this might be a number of effects. In particular, faster decay of the following part of a sunspot group results in a false apparent shift of the area-weighted center of the group toward the leading part. In this work we analyze how significantly this effect may contribute to the derived rotation rate. For a set of 670 active regions, we compare the rotation rate derived from continuum intensity images to that derived from line-of-sight magnetograms. We found that the difference between the calculated rotation rates is 0.45° day−1 on average. This value is comparable to the difference between the rotation rate of the solar surface near the equator and at 30° latitude. We conclude that the accuracy of the rotation rate measurements using white-light images is not satisfactory. Magnetograms should be used in future research on the differential rotation of the Sun.
探测太阳活动区自转速率的方法比较
摘要太阳黑子群常被用作探测太阳微分旋转的示踪剂。然而,不同作者对旋转速率变化的结果并不总是一致的。造成这种情况的原因可能是一系列的影响。特别是,太阳黑子群后面部分的快速衰减会导致该群的面积加权中心向前面部分的虚假明显移动。在这项工作中,我们分析了这种效应对导出的旋转速率有多大的影响。对于一组670个活动区域,我们比较了从连续强度图像得到的旋转速率和从视线磁图得到的旋转速率。我们发现,计算出的旋转速率之间的差异平均为0.45°day - 1。这个值相当于太阳表面赤道附近和30°纬度的自转速率之差。我们得出结论,使用白光图像测量旋转速率的精度是不令人满意的。磁图应该用于未来对太阳微分旋转的研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Astronomy
Open Astronomy Physics and Astronomy-Astronomy and Astrophysics
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
14.30%
发文量
37
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal disseminates research in both observational and theoretical astronomy, astrophysics, solar physics, cosmology, galactic and extragalactic astronomy, high energy particles physics, planetary science, space science and astronomy-related astrobiology, presenting as well the surveys dedicated to astronomical history and education.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信