{"title":"Beyond the Lonely Learner: Towards an Autoethnographic Method in Studying and Researching Religion","authors":"Gill Simpson","doi":"10.12775/pch.2020.018","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Being a learner can be lonely and isolating. The academic culture in the UK can leave an individual feeling segregated and alienated both from their peers and, importantly, from their authentic selves, as they scrabble to have their voices heard in an ever-segregating and performative environment. This can detract from a good learning experience, particularly in subjects like religious studies which require a multi-focal approach to learning. Humanistic education theory recognises the need for mutuality and friendship. The theory grew from humanistic psychologists who placed ‘I’ at the centre of education practices, and led to the rise of Critical Reflection as a means of self-development in many fields of study. This has, in turn, given rise to an increase in self-awareness in learners with the capacity for endless improvement. But it can leave the individual feeling disengaged from their holistic self, as personal and academic learning are separated, with a sense of fragmentation between the subject material and the personal meaning for the individual. So, are there other ways to approach learning which incorporate both the self and the subject matter in a more holistic way? This paper proposes that one possible solution is to develop an autoethnographical approach which allows the individual to engage in the subject material while seeking his/her own truths in those materials. The core ideals of autoethnography allow this by connecting ‘personal (insider) experience, insights and knowledge to larger (relational, cultural, political) conversations, contexts and conventions’ in order to create ‘nuanced, complex, and specific accounts of personal/cultural experience’ (Adams et al., 2015, p. 25). The author will challenge canonical ways of conducting research by exploring the possibility of using autoethnography as a means of cultivating dialogue with a learning community, a body of knowledge and with the self, to develop a method for learning religion which allows for a holistic and integrative approach to the individual’s own self-understanding, and helps alleviate the loneliness of the learner through learning in ways that are congruent with core values and ideals.","PeriodicalId":52686,"journal":{"name":"Paedagogia Christiana","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Paedagogia Christiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12775/pch.2020.018","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Being a learner can be lonely and isolating. The academic culture in the UK can leave an individual feeling segregated and alienated both from their peers and, importantly, from their authentic selves, as they scrabble to have their voices heard in an ever-segregating and performative environment. This can detract from a good learning experience, particularly in subjects like religious studies which require a multi-focal approach to learning. Humanistic education theory recognises the need for mutuality and friendship. The theory grew from humanistic psychologists who placed ‘I’ at the centre of education practices, and led to the rise of Critical Reflection as a means of self-development in many fields of study. This has, in turn, given rise to an increase in self-awareness in learners with the capacity for endless improvement. But it can leave the individual feeling disengaged from their holistic self, as personal and academic learning are separated, with a sense of fragmentation between the subject material and the personal meaning for the individual. So, are there other ways to approach learning which incorporate both the self and the subject matter in a more holistic way? This paper proposes that one possible solution is to develop an autoethnographical approach which allows the individual to engage in the subject material while seeking his/her own truths in those materials. The core ideals of autoethnography allow this by connecting ‘personal (insider) experience, insights and knowledge to larger (relational, cultural, political) conversations, contexts and conventions’ in order to create ‘nuanced, complex, and specific accounts of personal/cultural experience’ (Adams et al., 2015, p. 25). The author will challenge canonical ways of conducting research by exploring the possibility of using autoethnography as a means of cultivating dialogue with a learning community, a body of knowledge and with the self, to develop a method for learning religion which allows for a holistic and integrative approach to the individual’s own self-understanding, and helps alleviate the loneliness of the learner through learning in ways that are congruent with core values and ideals.
作为一个学习者可能会感到孤独和孤立。英国的学术文化可能会让个人感到与同龄人的隔离和疏远,更重要的是,与真实的自己的隔离和疏离,因为他们在一个不断隔离和表演的环境中努力让自己的声音被听到。这可能会影响良好的学习体验,尤其是在宗教研究等需要多焦点学习方法的科目中。人本主义教育理论认识到相互性和友谊的必要性。这一理论源于人文主义心理学家,他们将“我”置于教育实践的中心,并导致批判性反思作为许多研究领域自我发展的一种手段的兴起。这反过来又增强了学习者的自我意识,有能力不断提高。但这可能会让个人感觉脱离整体自我,因为个人学习和学术学习是分开的,主题材料和个人意义之间有一种割裂感。那么,有没有其他方法可以更全面地结合自我和主题来学习呢?本文提出了一种可能的解决方案,即开发一种自动民族志方法,允许个人参与主题材料,同时在这些材料中寻求他/她自己的真理。民族志的核心理念是通过将“个人(内部)经验、见解和知识与更大的(关系、文化、政治)对话、背景和惯例”联系起来,创造“对个人/文化经验的细致入微、复杂和具体的描述”(Adams et al.,2015,p.25)。作者将通过探索使用民族志作为培养与学习社区、知识体系和自我对话的一种手段的可能性,来挑战进行研究的规范方法,以开发一种学习宗教的方法,从而对个人的自我理解采取全面和综合的方法,并通过与核心价值观和理想相一致的学习方式帮助缓解学习者的孤独感。