Leon Trotsky and Soviet Historiography of the Russian Revolution (1918–1931)

IF 0.2 2区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY
J. D. White
{"title":"Leon Trotsky and Soviet Historiography of the Russian Revolution (1918–1931)","authors":"J. D. White","doi":"10.1080/09546545.2021.1983938","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article examines the part played by Leon Trotsky in establishing the principles on which Soviet historical writing on the Russian Revolution was carried on, including the practice of making programmatic versions of events universally obligatory. It also investigates the manner in which the respective remits of the two institutions, Istpart and the Institute of Red Professors (IKP), influenced the way the history of the 1917 revolution was presented in the 1920s. The article looks at how Istpart and IKP reacted to the anti-Trotsky campaign and at the debt Trotsky’s History of the Russian Revolution owes to materials produced by the two institutions. It is in the light of the interaction of Trotsky’s History and Soviet historiography that Stalin’s 1931 letter to Proletarskaia revoliutsiia is to be understood.","PeriodicalId":42121,"journal":{"name":"Revolutionary Russia","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revolutionary Russia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09546545.2021.1983938","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article examines the part played by Leon Trotsky in establishing the principles on which Soviet historical writing on the Russian Revolution was carried on, including the practice of making programmatic versions of events universally obligatory. It also investigates the manner in which the respective remits of the two institutions, Istpart and the Institute of Red Professors (IKP), influenced the way the history of the 1917 revolution was presented in the 1920s. The article looks at how Istpart and IKP reacted to the anti-Trotsky campaign and at the debt Trotsky’s History of the Russian Revolution owes to materials produced by the two institutions. It is in the light of the interaction of Trotsky’s History and Soviet historiography that Stalin’s 1931 letter to Proletarskaia revoliutsiia is to be understood.
列昂·托洛茨基与俄国革命的苏联史学(1918-1931)
文章考察了列昂·托洛茨基在确立苏联关于俄罗斯革命的历史写作所依据的原则方面所起的作用,包括使事件的程序化版本成为普遍强制性的做法。它还调查了伊斯特巴特和红色教授研究所这两个机构各自的职责对20世纪20年代1917年革命历史呈现方式的影响。这篇文章着眼于伊斯特帕特和IKP对反托洛茨基运动的反应,以及托洛茨基的《俄罗斯革命史》对这两个机构制作的材料的亏欠。斯大林1931年致无产阶级革命家的信,正是从托洛茨基史学与苏联史学的互动关系中得以理解的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信