{"title":"Avant-Garde Blake","authors":"David Hopkins","doi":"10.7227/bjrl.98.1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses how we might formulate an account of William\n Blake’s avant-garde reception. Having dealt with Peter\n Bürger’s theorisation of the notion of\n ‘avant-garde’, it concentrates on a series of portraits, made from\n Blake’s life mask, by Francis Bacon in 1955. This ‘high\n art’ response to the Romantic poet is then contrasted with a series of\n ‘subcultural’ responses made from within the British\n counterculture of the 1960s. Case studies are presented from the alternative\n magazine production of the period (notably an illustration from\n Oz magazine in which Blake’s imagery is conflated\n with that of Max Ernst). An article by David Widgery in Oz on\n Adrian Mitchell’s play Tyger (1971) is also discussed to\n show how the scholarly literature on Blake of the period (mainly David Erdman)\n was called on by the counterculture to comment on political issues (e.g. Enoch\n Powell’s 1968 ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech). The final section\n of the article shows how the ‘avant-gardism’ of\n Oz’s utilisation of Blake might be counterposed to\n the more activist left-wing approach to the poet in small magazines such as\n King Mob with their links to French situationism. In terms\n of the classic avant-garde call for a reintegration of art and life-praxis, such\n gestures testify to a moment in the 1960s when Blake may be considered fully\n ‘avant-garde’.","PeriodicalId":80816,"journal":{"name":"Bulletin. John Rylands University Library of Manchester","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bulletin. John Rylands University Library of Manchester","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7227/bjrl.98.1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
This article discusses how we might formulate an account of William
Blake’s avant-garde reception. Having dealt with Peter
Bürger’s theorisation of the notion of
‘avant-garde’, it concentrates on a series of portraits, made from
Blake’s life mask, by Francis Bacon in 1955. This ‘high
art’ response to the Romantic poet is then contrasted with a series of
‘subcultural’ responses made from within the British
counterculture of the 1960s. Case studies are presented from the alternative
magazine production of the period (notably an illustration from
Oz magazine in which Blake’s imagery is conflated
with that of Max Ernst). An article by David Widgery in Oz on
Adrian Mitchell’s play Tyger (1971) is also discussed to
show how the scholarly literature on Blake of the period (mainly David Erdman)
was called on by the counterculture to comment on political issues (e.g. Enoch
Powell’s 1968 ‘Rivers of Blood’ speech). The final section
of the article shows how the ‘avant-gardism’ of
Oz’s utilisation of Blake might be counterposed to
the more activist left-wing approach to the poet in small magazines such as
King Mob with their links to French situationism. In terms
of the classic avant-garde call for a reintegration of art and life-praxis, such
gestures testify to a moment in the 1960s when Blake may be considered fully
‘avant-garde’.