The Variety of Muslim Interpretations in Mass Media Public Discourses in German-speaking Switzerland

Q3 Social Sciences

Swiss Journal of Sociology Pub Date : 2020-07-16 DOI:10.2478/sjs-2020-0009

Noemi Trucco

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract This article examines Muslim interpretations in the mass media public discourses in German-speaking Switzerland. It focuses on the period from the moment of the adoption of the initiative against the construction of minarets untill mid-2017. On the basis of a discourse analysis four fields of positions are presented. It can be shown that there is a considerable variety of inter-Muslim interpretations. Those positions with the highest reception are characterized by an intolerance of ambiguity and an incorporation of hegemonial interpretative patterns.

查看原文本刊更多论文

瑞士德语区大众传媒公共话语中穆斯林解读的多样性

摘要本文考察了穆斯林在瑞士德语区大众媒体公共话语中的解释。它关注的是从反对修建宣礼塔倡议通过到2017年年中的这段时间。在语篇分析的基础上，提出了四个领域的立场。可以看出，穆斯林之间有相当多种的解释。那些受到最高欢迎的立场的特点是不容忍模棱两可和纳入霸权主义的解释模式。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Swiss Journal of Sociology Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)

CiteScore

1.50

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

50 weeks

期刊介绍： The Swiss Journal of Sociology was established in 1975 on the initiative of the Swiss Sociological Association. It is published by Seismo and appears three times a year with the support of the Swiss Academy of Humanities and Social Sciences. Since 2016, all the articles of the Swiss Journal of Sociology are available as open access documents on De Gruyter Open: https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/sjs The journal is a multilingual voice for analysis and research in sociology. It publishes work on the theory, methods, practice, and history of the social sciences in English, French, or German. Although a central aim of the Journal is to reflect the state of the discipline in Switzerland as well as current developments, articles, research notes, debates, and book reviews will be accepted irrespective of the author’s nationality or whether the submitted work focuses on this country. The journal is understood as a representative medium and therefore open to all research areas, to a plurality of schools and methodological approaches. It neither favours nor excludes any research orientation but particularly intends to promote communication between different perspectives. In order to fulfil this aim, all submissions will be refereed anonymously by at least two reviewers.