Evaluation of Barrett Universal II, SRK-T, and Haigis formulae for intraocular lens power calculation in myopes using optical biometry

IF 0.1 Q4 OPHTHALMOLOGY
Demiana Aziz, M. Osman, N. Hassan, Nermeen Bahgat
{"title":"Evaluation of Barrett Universal II, SRK-T, and Haigis formulae for intraocular lens power calculation in myopes using optical biometry","authors":"Demiana Aziz, M. Osman, N. Hassan, Nermeen Bahgat","doi":"10.4103/ejos.ejos_34_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To assess the precision of Barrett Universal II, SRK-T, and Haigis formulas in high myopic eyes for the estimation of intraocular lens power, using optical biometry. Patients and methods This is an interventional prospective study that included 34 eyes with an axial length more than or equal to 26 mm, who underwent uneventful phacoemulsification. One month after the surgery, we recorded the postoperative refraction. Refractive prediction error (RPE), median absolute error (Med AE), and proportion of eyes with postoperative myopic and hyperopic outcomes were compared. Results The lowest mean RPE (−0.11±0.90 D), Med AE (0.15 D), and proportion of eyes with hyperopic outcomes (44.1%) were reported with the Barrett Universal II formula. They were all statistically lower than the results of SKR/T and Haigis formulas (mean RPE 0.16±0.99 and 0.31±0.98 D, respectively; Med AE 0.47 and 0.40 D, respectively; and percentage of hyperopic outcome 70.6 and 76.5%, respectively). Conclusion We concluded that the lowest mean RPE, median AE, and the lowest percentage of hyperopic outcome were reported with the Barrett Universal II formula.","PeriodicalId":31572,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Egyptian Ophthalmological Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ejos.ejos_34_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OPHTHALMOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective To assess the precision of Barrett Universal II, SRK-T, and Haigis formulas in high myopic eyes for the estimation of intraocular lens power, using optical biometry. Patients and methods This is an interventional prospective study that included 34 eyes with an axial length more than or equal to 26 mm, who underwent uneventful phacoemulsification. One month after the surgery, we recorded the postoperative refraction. Refractive prediction error (RPE), median absolute error (Med AE), and proportion of eyes with postoperative myopic and hyperopic outcomes were compared. Results The lowest mean RPE (−0.11±0.90 D), Med AE (0.15 D), and proportion of eyes with hyperopic outcomes (44.1%) were reported with the Barrett Universal II formula. They were all statistically lower than the results of SKR/T and Haigis formulas (mean RPE 0.16±0.99 and 0.31±0.98 D, respectively; Med AE 0.47 and 0.40 D, respectively; and percentage of hyperopic outcome 70.6 and 76.5%, respectively). Conclusion We concluded that the lowest mean RPE, median AE, and the lowest percentage of hyperopic outcome were reported with the Barrett Universal II formula.
Barrett Universal II、SRK-T和Haigis公式在近视眼人工晶状体度数计算中的应用
目的评价Barrett Universal II、SRK-T和Haigis公式在高度近视眼中使用光学生物测量法估计人工晶状体度数的准确性。患者和方法这是一项介入性前瞻性研究,包括34只眼,眼轴长度大于或等于26 mm进行了平静的超声乳化术。术后一个月,我们记录了术后屈光情况。比较了屈光预测误差(RPE)、中位绝对误差(Med AE)以及术后近视和远视结果的眼睛比例。结果Barrett Universal II配方奶粉的平均RPE最低(-0.11±0.90 D),Med AE最低(0.15 D),远视结果的眼睛比例最低(44.1%)。它们在统计学上均低于SKR/T和Haigis公式的结果(平均RPE分别为0.16±0.99和0.31±0.98 D;Med AE分别为0.47和0.40 D;远视结果的百分比分别为70.6%和76.5%)。结论我们得出的结论是,Barrett Universal II公式报告的平均RPE、中位AE和远视结果百分比最低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
审稿时长
19 weeks
文献相关原料
公司名称 产品信息 采购帮参考价格
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信