LEGAL AND REGULATORY APPROACHES IN ṢUKŪK ISSUANCE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS

Q3 Social Sciences
Ghezal Mohamed, Rusni Hassan, Ahcene Lahsasna
{"title":"LEGAL AND REGULATORY APPROACHES IN ṢUKŪK ISSUANCE: A COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS","authors":"Ghezal Mohamed, Rusni Hassan, Ahcene Lahsasna","doi":"10.32890/uumjls2022.13.1.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Ṣukūk structure seems to be closer to bonds structure. Many jurisdictions have applied bonds rules on Ṣukūk to permit its issuance without a specific and adequate legal framework. Proper Ṣukūk legal and regulatory frameworks are quite needed to distinguish Ṣukūk from bonds. The purpose of this article is to compare the legal and regulatory frameworks of Ṣukūk issuance in different countries and to examine the core provisions that allow the direct issuance of Ṣukūk. This article is based on a comparative method which analyses the main legal and regulatory approaches that underpinned the issuance of Ṣukūk in some countries. The required data is gathered from the relevant laws and regulations of countries like Indonesia, Malaysia and U.K, law books, and articles. The findings of this article reveal that Ṣukūk has been regulated under two approaches, namely by enacting a separate law or amending the existing legislations. This study has also highlighted the models to follow in the event there was a need to regulate Ṣukūk at the same level as conventional bonds, so as to allow for Ṣukūk issuance. It provides a wide range of the best lessons of some jurisdictions that have implemented the regulatory framework of Ṣukūk in order to strengthen the local rules for Ṣukūk market position.","PeriodicalId":37075,"journal":{"name":"UUM Journal of Legal Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UUM Journal of Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32890/uumjls2022.13.1.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Ṣukūk structure seems to be closer to bonds structure. Many jurisdictions have applied bonds rules on Ṣukūk to permit its issuance without a specific and adequate legal framework. Proper Ṣukūk legal and regulatory frameworks are quite needed to distinguish Ṣukūk from bonds. The purpose of this article is to compare the legal and regulatory frameworks of Ṣukūk issuance in different countries and to examine the core provisions that allow the direct issuance of Ṣukūk. This article is based on a comparative method which analyses the main legal and regulatory approaches that underpinned the issuance of Ṣukūk in some countries. The required data is gathered from the relevant laws and regulations of countries like Indonesia, Malaysia and U.K, law books, and articles. The findings of this article reveal that Ṣukūk has been regulated under two approaches, namely by enacting a separate law or amending the existing legislations. This study has also highlighted the models to follow in the event there was a need to regulate Ṣukūk at the same level as conventional bonds, so as to allow for Ṣukūk issuance. It provides a wide range of the best lessons of some jurisdictions that have implemented the regulatory framework of Ṣukūk in order to strengthen the local rules for Ṣukūk market position.
法律和监管方法Ṣ英国发行:比较分析
Ṣukūk结构似乎更接近键结构。许多司法管辖区对Ṣukūk适用债券规则,允许其在没有具体和适当的法律框架的情况下发行。需要适当的Ṣukūk法律和监管框架将Ṣukūk与债券区分开来。本文的目的是比较不同国家Ṣukūk发行的法律和监管框架,并审查允许直接发行Ṣukūk的核心条款。本文基于一种比较方法,分析了一些国家发行Ṣukūk的主要法律和监管途径。所需的数据收集自印度尼西亚、马来西亚、英国等国家的相关法律法规、法律书籍和文章。本文的研究结果表明,对Ṣukūk的管理有两种方式,即颁布单独的法律或修改现有的立法。本研究还强调了在需要对Ṣukūk进行与传统债券相同级别的监管时应遵循的模型,以便允许Ṣukūk的发行。它提供了一些已经实施Ṣukūk监管框架的司法管辖区的广泛的最佳经验教训,以加强Ṣukūk市场地位的地方规则。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
UUM Journal of Legal Studies
UUM Journal of Legal Studies Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
33
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信