Needs assessment of faculty members' educational needs in order to empower them at Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences

F. Karimi, M. Hosseini, A. Malekpour, M. Moezzi, A. Hosseini, nima raisi, K. Raisi
{"title":"Needs assessment of faculty members' educational needs in order to empower them at Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences","authors":"F. Karimi, M. Hosseini, A. Malekpour, M. Moezzi, A. Hosseini, nima raisi, K. Raisi","doi":"10.29252/DSME.6.1.47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Faculty members are considered as basic resources of every university. Therefore, educational needs assessment in order to empower most faculty members is an inseparable part of educational planning Methods : The study was conducted using a descriptive c ross sectional method. The population consisted of university professors. About 65% professors participated. The reliability and validity of data collection tool, a self-made researcher questionnaire, was approved according to different studies. The participants were selected through census method and the results were analyzed using SPSS software. Res ults: The highest priority of the professors in this study included the realms of modern methods and techniques of teaching (68%), training tips and consultation (62%), methods of professional promotion (61%), academic regulations and rules (58/3%), applying computers in education (55%), evidence-based practice (47%), and student assessment methods (43%). Among different academic ranks (p=. / 043) or instructors of basic sciences and clinical sciences (p =. / 053), there was no statistically significant difference between the instructors' preference to attend the workshops virtually or in person and they mostly preferred to attend the workshops in person. Conclusion: Holding educational workshops, considering educational priorities, to empower professors functionally, seems necessary.","PeriodicalId":32175,"journal":{"name":"Development Strategies in Medical Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development Strategies in Medical Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29252/DSME.6.1.47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Faculty members are considered as basic resources of every university. Therefore, educational needs assessment in order to empower most faculty members is an inseparable part of educational planning Methods : The study was conducted using a descriptive c ross sectional method. The population consisted of university professors. About 65% professors participated. The reliability and validity of data collection tool, a self-made researcher questionnaire, was approved according to different studies. The participants were selected through census method and the results were analyzed using SPSS software. Res ults: The highest priority of the professors in this study included the realms of modern methods and techniques of teaching (68%), training tips and consultation (62%), methods of professional promotion (61%), academic regulations and rules (58/3%), applying computers in education (55%), evidence-based practice (47%), and student assessment methods (43%). Among different academic ranks (p=. / 043) or instructors of basic sciences and clinical sciences (p =. / 053), there was no statistically significant difference between the instructors' preference to attend the workshops virtually or in person and they mostly preferred to attend the workshops in person. Conclusion: Holding educational workshops, considering educational priorities, to empower professors functionally, seems necessary.
对Shahreford医学科学大学教员的教育需求进行需求评估,以增强他们的能力
教师是每一所大学的基本资源。因此,教育需求评估是教育规划不可分割的一部分,以授权大多数教师。研究采用描述性横断面方法进行。人口由大学教授组成。约65%的教授参与了调查。根据不同的研究,对数据收集工具——自制研究者问卷的信度和效度进行了验证。采用人口普查法对调查对象进行抽样,并采用SPSS软件对调查结果进行分析。结果:本研究中教授最重视的领域包括现代教学方法和技术(68%)、培训技巧和咨询(62%)、专业晋升方法(61%)、学术法规和规则(58/3%)、计算机在教育中的应用(55%)、循证实践(47%)和学生评估方法(43%)。在不同的学术等级中(p=。/ 043)或基础科学和临床科学教师(p =。/ 053),教师对虚拟或亲自参加研讨会的偏好之间没有统计学差异,他们大多更喜欢亲自参加研讨会。结论:举办教育研讨会,考虑教育重点,赋予教授功能似乎是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书