The Second Jerusalem Biennale for Contemporary Jewish Art 2015

IF 0.1 0 ART
S. Fraiman
{"title":"The Second Jerusalem Biennale for Contemporary Jewish Art 2015","authors":"S. Fraiman","doi":"10.3828/aj.2016.10a","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"1 The exhibits at the Schechter Institute and the Shelter for Art were affiliated exhibits not vetted by the Biennale board. 2 Numbers Rabbah on Parashat Naso, 4:12. “Another explanation: It is an allusion to [the seventy names of God], the seventy names which Israel bears, the seventy names of the Torah and the seventy names of Jerusalem.” Judah Slotki, translator, Midrash Rabbah – Numbers, vol. 2 (London, 1939), 620. There are several midrashic versions of the list of seventy names. For a scholarly examination of the various names of Contemporary Jewish art is finally enjoying the recognition it deserves, and has found an important home in The Jerusalem Biennale for Contemporary Jewish Art, which was held for the second time from September 24 through November 5, 2015. This year’s Biennale, twice the size of the first one in 2013, was the outcome of concentrated efforts by its founder, Rami Ozeri, and an advisory board of scholars and museum professionals that guided the selection process. Forty-six proposals were submitted, of which nine were accepted. The various works in a wide range of subjects and materials were exhibited in venues throughout Jerusalem. Nearly 200 artists were represented, with groups coming from as far away as Los Angeles, New York, and Buenos Aires. Not all of the artists were religiously observant Jews, or even Jewish, but all of the exhibits dealt in some way with the contemporary Jewish experience, including the Israeli experience. Among the Biennale’s venues this year were representatives of all the streams of Judaism: Reform (Hebrew Union College), Conservative (The Schechter Institute of Jewish Studies), Orthodox (Hechal Shlomo), and Ultra-Orthodox (The Shelter for Art).1 One unique feature of the Jerusalem Biennale is its use of a variety of unique Jerusalem venues as opposed to the “white cubes” built temporarily for exhibits at many other biennales. The principal venue was the Tower of David Museum, which exhibited pieces by the iconic Israeli artists Sigalit Landau and Motti Mizrachi, as well as works by Dov Abramson, Pablo Lobato, and Ynin Shillo, all curated by the advisory committee and shown under the title Jerusalem/ Passages. Abramson created a graphic map of Jerusalem with seventy identically sized tiles for the seventy biblical names of Jerusalem, according to Midrash.2 He displayed unique graphic logos for each area of the city, one on each tile, thus citing both Jewish texts and ceramic tile, which is the traditional medium of decorative art in Jerusalem. Lobato photographed soldiers standing at attention at the Western Wall, and Shillo filmed the Jewish cemetery on the Mount of Olives, capturing the silence of eternity in a meditative piece. Several articles about the Tower of David exhibits appear in the catalogue: Emily Bilski’s essay “Images of Jerusalem”3 deals with the works of Shillo, Lobato, and Abramson, and Amitai Mendelssohn’s piece is about “Sigalit Landau and Yotam From, Salt-Crystal Bridal Gown, 2014.” 4 There were three exhibits in downtown Jerusalem: one at Hebrew Union College, another at the Worldwide North Africa Jewish Heritage Center, and one at Hechal Shlomo. The exhibit at the Heritage Center, Bezalel School: In & Out, which was curated by Shirat-Miriam Shamir and Ido Noy, focused on contemporary ritual objects created by Bezalel teachers and graduates. These included items for both synagogue and home use, such as Haggadot, mezuzot, Hanukkah menorahs, and wedding rings. The various objects were made with a wide range","PeriodicalId":41476,"journal":{"name":"Ars Judaica-The Bar Ilan Journal of Jewish Art","volume":"12 1","pages":"145 - 148"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2018-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ars Judaica-The Bar Ilan Journal of Jewish Art","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3828/aj.2016.10a","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

1 The exhibits at the Schechter Institute and the Shelter for Art were affiliated exhibits not vetted by the Biennale board. 2 Numbers Rabbah on Parashat Naso, 4:12. “Another explanation: It is an allusion to [the seventy names of God], the seventy names which Israel bears, the seventy names of the Torah and the seventy names of Jerusalem.” Judah Slotki, translator, Midrash Rabbah – Numbers, vol. 2 (London, 1939), 620. There are several midrashic versions of the list of seventy names. For a scholarly examination of the various names of Contemporary Jewish art is finally enjoying the recognition it deserves, and has found an important home in The Jerusalem Biennale for Contemporary Jewish Art, which was held for the second time from September 24 through November 5, 2015. This year’s Biennale, twice the size of the first one in 2013, was the outcome of concentrated efforts by its founder, Rami Ozeri, and an advisory board of scholars and museum professionals that guided the selection process. Forty-six proposals were submitted, of which nine were accepted. The various works in a wide range of subjects and materials were exhibited in venues throughout Jerusalem. Nearly 200 artists were represented, with groups coming from as far away as Los Angeles, New York, and Buenos Aires. Not all of the artists were religiously observant Jews, or even Jewish, but all of the exhibits dealt in some way with the contemporary Jewish experience, including the Israeli experience. Among the Biennale’s venues this year were representatives of all the streams of Judaism: Reform (Hebrew Union College), Conservative (The Schechter Institute of Jewish Studies), Orthodox (Hechal Shlomo), and Ultra-Orthodox (The Shelter for Art).1 One unique feature of the Jerusalem Biennale is its use of a variety of unique Jerusalem venues as opposed to the “white cubes” built temporarily for exhibits at many other biennales. The principal venue was the Tower of David Museum, which exhibited pieces by the iconic Israeli artists Sigalit Landau and Motti Mizrachi, as well as works by Dov Abramson, Pablo Lobato, and Ynin Shillo, all curated by the advisory committee and shown under the title Jerusalem/ Passages. Abramson created a graphic map of Jerusalem with seventy identically sized tiles for the seventy biblical names of Jerusalem, according to Midrash.2 He displayed unique graphic logos for each area of the city, one on each tile, thus citing both Jewish texts and ceramic tile, which is the traditional medium of decorative art in Jerusalem. Lobato photographed soldiers standing at attention at the Western Wall, and Shillo filmed the Jewish cemetery on the Mount of Olives, capturing the silence of eternity in a meditative piece. Several articles about the Tower of David exhibits appear in the catalogue: Emily Bilski’s essay “Images of Jerusalem”3 deals with the works of Shillo, Lobato, and Abramson, and Amitai Mendelssohn’s piece is about “Sigalit Landau and Yotam From, Salt-Crystal Bridal Gown, 2014.” 4 There were three exhibits in downtown Jerusalem: one at Hebrew Union College, another at the Worldwide North Africa Jewish Heritage Center, and one at Hechal Shlomo. The exhibit at the Heritage Center, Bezalel School: In & Out, which was curated by Shirat-Miriam Shamir and Ido Noy, focused on contemporary ritual objects created by Bezalel teachers and graduates. These included items for both synagogue and home use, such as Haggadot, mezuzot, Hanukkah menorahs, and wedding rings. The various objects were made with a wide range
2015年第二届耶路撒冷当代犹太艺术双年展
谢克特研究所和艺术庇护所的展品是附属展品,没有经过双年展董事会的审查。民数记2拉巴在巴拉沙拿朔,4:12。“另一种解释是:这是对[上帝的七十个名字]的暗示,以色列的七十个名字,摩西五经的七十个名字和耶路撒冷的七十个名字。”犹大·斯洛特基译,《米德拉什·拉巴-数字》第二卷(伦敦,1939年),620页。这70个名字有几个米德拉西语版本。对当代犹太艺术各种名称的学术考察终于得到了应有的认可,并在2015年9月24日至11月5日举行的第二届耶路撒冷当代犹太艺术双年展中找到了一个重要的家。今年的双年展规模是2013年第一届的两倍,是其创始人拉米·奥泽里(Rami Ozeri)和一个由学者和博物馆专业人士组成的顾问委员会集中努力的结果,该委员会指导了评选过程。提出了46项建议,其中9项获得接受。各种主题和材料的各种作品在耶路撒冷各地展出。近200名艺术家参加了这次活动,其中有来自洛杉矶、纽约和布宜诺斯艾利斯的团体。并非所有的艺术家都是虔诚的犹太人,甚至不是犹太人,但所有的展品都以某种方式处理当代犹太人的经历,包括以色列的经历。在今年的双年展中,代表了犹太教的所有流派:改革派(希伯来联合学院)、保守派(谢克特犹太研究学院)、正统派(Hechal Shlomo)和极端正统派(艺术庇护所)耶路撒冷双年展的一个独特之处在于它使用了各种独特的耶路撒冷场地,而不是在许多其他双年展上临时建造的“白色立方体”。主要场地是大卫塔博物馆,展出了以色列标志性艺术家Sigalit Landau和Motti Mizrachi的作品,以及Dov Abramson, Pablo Lobato和yynin Shillo的作品,这些作品都是由咨询委员会策划的,并以“耶路撒冷/通道”的标题展示。根据米德拉什的说法,艾布拉姆森用70块大小相同的瓷砖为耶路撒冷的70个圣经名字制作了耶路撒冷的图形地图。他为城市的每个地区展示了独特的图形标志,每块瓷砖上都有一个,从而引用了犹太文本和瓷砖,这是耶路撒冷装饰艺术的传统媒介。洛巴托拍摄了在西墙立正站立的士兵,希洛拍摄了橄榄山上的犹太人墓地,在沉思的作品中捕捉到了永恒的寂静。几篇关于大卫塔展览的文章出现在目录中:艾米丽·比尔斯基的文章“耶路撒冷的图像”3涉及希洛,洛巴托和艾布拉姆森的作品,阿米泰·门德尔松的作品是关于“Sigalit Landau和Yotam From,盐水晶婚纱,2014年”。在耶路撒冷市中心有三场展览:一场在希伯来联合学院,另一场在世界北非犹太遗产中心,还有一场在赫哈尔什洛莫。这次展览在比撒列学校遗产中心举行,由Shirat-Miriam Shamir和Ido Noy策划,重点展出了比撒列教师和毕业生创作的当代仪式物品。这些包括犹太教堂和家庭使用的物品,如Haggadot, mezuzot,光明节烛台和结婚戒指。各种各样的物品被制作得五花八门
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信