Clinical Predictors of Upstaging to Invasive Cancer Postoperatively in Patients Diagnosed with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ before Surgery

K. Lee, J. Han, Eun-young Kim, J. Yun, Y. Park, Chan Heun Park
{"title":"Clinical Predictors of Upstaging to Invasive Cancer Postoperatively in Patients Diagnosed with Ductal Carcinoma In Situ before Surgery","authors":"K. Lee, J. Han, Eun-young Kim, J. Yun, Y. Park, Chan Heun Park","doi":"10.46268/JSU.2019.6.2.38","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Upstaging to invasive cancer (IC) is often found after surgery in those patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and who underwent preoperative needle biopsy. This may change the post-surgical plans that include the re-operation, chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy. Yet, there are no clinically available factors to predict IC in preoperatively diagnosed DCIS patients. This study evaluated the clinical and pathological predictive risk factors for upgrading DCIS to IC. Methods: This study retrospectively evaluated those patients who were diagnosed with DCIS preoperatively, and this diagnosis was followed by performing breast surgery between Jan 2005 and June 2018. Clinico-pathological factors were collected for the analysis between the pure DCIS group and the IC group. Results: Of the 431 patients included in the study, 34 (7.9%) were upstaged to IC after surgery, and 397 (92.1%) were diagnosed as having pure DCIS. The nuclear grade was the sole predictor of upstaging to IC on the analysis of the clinico-pathological factors (odds ratio [OR] = 2.39, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 1.05 – 5.42, P = 0.038 on the univariate analysis; aOR = 2.86, 95% CI = 1.14 – 7.14, P = 0.025 on the multivariate analysis). The mass’s size and characteristics, as determined by sonography, were not predictive of IC. Conclusion: The sonographic findings were not significant factors for predicting IC in preoperative DCIS patients. A high nuclear grade was the only statistically significant factor associated with IC. Considering the variability of the gauge of biopsy needles or the method for needle biopsy, large-scale prospective studies that control these variables may well reveal available predictive factors of IC in patients with DCIS.","PeriodicalId":33937,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Surgical Ultrasound","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Surgical Ultrasound","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46268/JSU.2019.6.2.38","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Upstaging to invasive cancer (IC) is often found after surgery in those patients diagnosed with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and who underwent preoperative needle biopsy. This may change the post-surgical plans that include the re-operation, chemotherapy, and/or radiotherapy. Yet, there are no clinically available factors to predict IC in preoperatively diagnosed DCIS patients. This study evaluated the clinical and pathological predictive risk factors for upgrading DCIS to IC. Methods: This study retrospectively evaluated those patients who were diagnosed with DCIS preoperatively, and this diagnosis was followed by performing breast surgery between Jan 2005 and June 2018. Clinico-pathological factors were collected for the analysis between the pure DCIS group and the IC group. Results: Of the 431 patients included in the study, 34 (7.9%) were upstaged to IC after surgery, and 397 (92.1%) were diagnosed as having pure DCIS. The nuclear grade was the sole predictor of upstaging to IC on the analysis of the clinico-pathological factors (odds ratio [OR] = 2.39, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] = 1.05 – 5.42, P = 0.038 on the univariate analysis; aOR = 2.86, 95% CI = 1.14 – 7.14, P = 0.025 on the multivariate analysis). The mass’s size and characteristics, as determined by sonography, were not predictive of IC. Conclusion: The sonographic findings were not significant factors for predicting IC in preoperative DCIS patients. A high nuclear grade was the only statistically significant factor associated with IC. Considering the variability of the gauge of biopsy needles or the method for needle biopsy, large-scale prospective studies that control these variables may well reveal available predictive factors of IC in patients with DCIS.
导管原位癌患者术后晚期浸润性癌的临床预测因素
目的:在那些被诊断为导管原位癌(DCIS)并在术前接受穿刺活检的患者中,术后经常发现侵袭性癌症(IC)的分期升高。这可能会改变手术后的计划,包括再次手术、化疗和/或放疗。然而,在术前诊断的DCIS患者中,没有临床可用的因素来预测IC。本研究评估了将DCIS升级为IC的临床和病理预测危险因素。方法:本研究回顾性评估了术前诊断为DCIS的患者,并在2005年1月至2018年6月期间进行了乳腺手术。收集临床病理因素用于纯DCIS组和IC组之间的分析。结果:在纳入研究的431名患者中,34名(7.9%)在手术后被诊断为IC,397名(92.1%)被诊断为单纯DCIS。在临床病理因素分析中,核分级是上升到IC的唯一预测因素(优势比[OR]=2.39,95%置信区间[95%CI]=1.05–5.42,单变量分析中P=0.038;多变量分析中aOR=2.86,95%CI=1.14–7.14,P=0.025)。根据超声检查,肿块的大小和特征不能预测IC。结论:超声检查结果不是预测术前DCIS患者IC的重要因素。高核分级是唯一与IC相关的具有统计学意义的因素。考虑到活检针规格或针活检方法的可变性,控制这些变量的大规模前瞻性研究很可能揭示DCIS患者IC的可用预测因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信