17 Left ventricular rconstruction surgery

Q2 Medicine
S. Tsui
{"title":"17 Left ventricular rconstruction surgery","authors":"S. Tsui","doi":"10.1136/heartasia-2019-apahff.17","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Acute myocardial infarction and ischaemic cardiomyopathy are important causes of heart failure (HF). With ageing populations in developed nations, the incidences can be expected to rise in the coming decades. Stretch of a left ventricle (LV) scar results in detrimental ventricular remodelling, LV dilatation and a change in geometry from elliptical to spherical. These result in higher wall stress and less effective ventricular contractions. Surgical techniques to restore the shape of the remodelled ventricle were introduced in early 1980s.1 The RESTORE registry and others reported favourable outcomes in >5000 patients.2 However, the NHLBI and NIH-funded prospective randomised STICH Trial found no additional benefit of LV reconstruction in addition to coronary bypass grafting.3 The STICH Trial was well conducted. The neutral findings did curb enthusiasm for LV reconstruction surgery. However, the interpretation of STICH was not incontrovertible and had sparked heated debates.4 Subsequent re-analysis of STICH confirmed significant survival benefit when adequate LV volume reduction was achieved.5 New data from experienced centres continued to demonstrate efficacy of LV reconstruction surgery.6 7 The 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure recommended LV reconstruction for HF with reduce ejection fraction with a recommendation class IIb, level of evidence B.8 Unsurprisingly, the field remains confused about the role of this treatment. In order to facilitate appropriate sizing of the LV during reconstruction, graduated balloons are now available for use as templates. A new device has been developed for less invasive off-pump LV reconstruction and a Phase 2 clinical trial is now underway. References Dor V. Reconstructive left ventricular surgery for post-ischemic akinetic dilatation. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;9:139–145. Athanasuleas CL, Buckberg GD, Stanley AW, Siler W, Dor V, Di Donato M, Menicanti L, Almeida de Oliveira S, Beyersdorf F, Kron IL, Suma H, Kouchoukos NT, Moore W, McCarthy PM, Oz MC, Fontan F, Scott ML, Accola KA; RESTORE group. Surgical ventricular restoration in the treatment of congestive heart failure due to post-infarction ventricular dilation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1439–1445. Jones RH, Velazquez EJ, Michler RE, Sopko G, Oh JK, O’Connor CM, Hill JA, Menicanti L, Sadowski Z, Desvigne-Nickens P, Rouleau JL, Lee KL; STICH Hypothesis 2 Investigators. Coronary bypass surgery with or without surgical ventricular reconstruction. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1705–1717. Buckberg GD, Athanasuleas CL. The STICH trial: misguided conclusions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;138:1060–1064. Michler RE, Rouleau JL, Al-Khalidi HR, Bonow RO, Pellikka PA, Pohost GM, Holly TA, Oh JK, Dagenais F, Milano C, Wrobel K, Pirk J, Ali IS, Jones RH, Velazquez EJ, Lee KL, Di Donato M; STICH Trial Investigators. Insights from the STICH trial: change in left ventricular size after coronary artery bypass grafting with and without surgical ventricular reconstruction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;146:1139–1145. Dor V, Civaia F, Alexandrescu C, Sabatier M, Montiglio F. Favorable effects of left ventricular reconstruction in patients excluded from the Surgical Treatments for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;141:905–916. Calafiore AM, Iaco’ AL, Kheirallah H, Sheikh AA, Al Sayed H, El Rasheed M, Allam A, Awadi MO, Alfonso JJ, Osman AA, Di Mauro M. Outcome of left ventricular surgical remodelling after the STICH trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016;50:693–701. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Butler J, Casey DE Jr, Drazner MH, Fonarow GC, Geraci SA, Horwich T, Januzzi JL, Johnson MR, Kasper EK, Levy WC, Masoudi FA, McBride PE, McMurray JJ, Mitchell JE, Peterson PN, Riegel B, Sam F, Stevenson LW, Tang WH, Tsai EJ, Wilkoff BL; American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:e147–239.","PeriodicalId":12858,"journal":{"name":"Heart Asia","volume":" ","pages":"A8 - A8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/heartasia-2019-apahff.17","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heart Asia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/heartasia-2019-apahff.17","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Acute myocardial infarction and ischaemic cardiomyopathy are important causes of heart failure (HF). With ageing populations in developed nations, the incidences can be expected to rise in the coming decades. Stretch of a left ventricle (LV) scar results in detrimental ventricular remodelling, LV dilatation and a change in geometry from elliptical to spherical. These result in higher wall stress and less effective ventricular contractions. Surgical techniques to restore the shape of the remodelled ventricle were introduced in early 1980s.1 The RESTORE registry and others reported favourable outcomes in >5000 patients.2 However, the NHLBI and NIH-funded prospective randomised STICH Trial found no additional benefit of LV reconstruction in addition to coronary bypass grafting.3 The STICH Trial was well conducted. The neutral findings did curb enthusiasm for LV reconstruction surgery. However, the interpretation of STICH was not incontrovertible and had sparked heated debates.4 Subsequent re-analysis of STICH confirmed significant survival benefit when adequate LV volume reduction was achieved.5 New data from experienced centres continued to demonstrate efficacy of LV reconstruction surgery.6 7 The 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of Heart Failure recommended LV reconstruction for HF with reduce ejection fraction with a recommendation class IIb, level of evidence B.8 Unsurprisingly, the field remains confused about the role of this treatment. In order to facilitate appropriate sizing of the LV during reconstruction, graduated balloons are now available for use as templates. A new device has been developed for less invasive off-pump LV reconstruction and a Phase 2 clinical trial is now underway. References Dor V. Reconstructive left ventricular surgery for post-ischemic akinetic dilatation. Semin Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1997;9:139–145. Athanasuleas CL, Buckberg GD, Stanley AW, Siler W, Dor V, Di Donato M, Menicanti L, Almeida de Oliveira S, Beyersdorf F, Kron IL, Suma H, Kouchoukos NT, Moore W, McCarthy PM, Oz MC, Fontan F, Scott ML, Accola KA; RESTORE group. Surgical ventricular restoration in the treatment of congestive heart failure due to post-infarction ventricular dilation. J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44:1439–1445. Jones RH, Velazquez EJ, Michler RE, Sopko G, Oh JK, O’Connor CM, Hill JA, Menicanti L, Sadowski Z, Desvigne-Nickens P, Rouleau JL, Lee KL; STICH Hypothesis 2 Investigators. Coronary bypass surgery with or without surgical ventricular reconstruction. N Engl J Med 2009;360:1705–1717. Buckberg GD, Athanasuleas CL. The STICH trial: misguided conclusions. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2009;138:1060–1064. Michler RE, Rouleau JL, Al-Khalidi HR, Bonow RO, Pellikka PA, Pohost GM, Holly TA, Oh JK, Dagenais F, Milano C, Wrobel K, Pirk J, Ali IS, Jones RH, Velazquez EJ, Lee KL, Di Donato M; STICH Trial Investigators. Insights from the STICH trial: change in left ventricular size after coronary artery bypass grafting with and without surgical ventricular reconstruction. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2013;146:1139–1145. Dor V, Civaia F, Alexandrescu C, Sabatier M, Montiglio F. Favorable effects of left ventricular reconstruction in patients excluded from the Surgical Treatments for Ischemic Heart Failure (STICH) trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 2011;141:905–916. Calafiore AM, Iaco’ AL, Kheirallah H, Sheikh AA, Al Sayed H, El Rasheed M, Allam A, Awadi MO, Alfonso JJ, Osman AA, Di Mauro M. Outcome of left ventricular surgical remodelling after the STICH trial. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016;50:693–701. Yancy CW, Jessup M, Bozkurt B, Butler J, Casey DE Jr, Drazner MH, Fonarow GC, Geraci SA, Horwich T, Januzzi JL, Johnson MR, Kasper EK, Levy WC, Masoudi FA, McBride PE, McMurray JJ, Mitchell JE, Peterson PN, Riegel B, Sam F, Stevenson LW, Tang WH, Tsai EJ, Wilkoff BL; American College of Cardiology Foundation; American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of heart failure: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol 2013;62:e147–239.
17 左心室重构手术
急性心肌梗死和缺血性心肌病是心力衰竭的重要原因。随着发达国家人口的老龄化,预计未来几十年发病率还会上升。左心室(LV)疤痕的拉伸会导致有害的心室重塑、LV扩张和几何结构从椭圆形变为球形。这些导致较高的壁应力和较低的有效心室收缩。20世纪80年代初引入了恢复重塑心室形状的外科技术。1 restore注册中心和其他机构报告了5000多名患者的良好结果。2然而,NHLBI和NIH资助的前瞻性随机STICH试验发现,除了冠状动脉搭桥术外,左心室重建没有其他益处。3 STICH试验进行得很好。中立的发现确实抑制了人们对左心室重建手术的热情。然而STICH的解释并非无可争辩,并引发了激烈的争论。4随后对STICH的重新分析证实,当左心室容积充分减少时,具有显著的生存益处。5来自经验丰富的中心的新数据继续证明了左心室重建手术的有效性。6 7 2013年ACCF/AHA心力衰竭管理指南推荐了左心室射血分数降低的HF重建,推荐IIb级,证据水平B.8不出所料,该领域对这种治疗的作用仍然感到困惑。为了便于在重建过程中对LV进行适当的尺寸调整,现在可以使用刻度气球作为模板。一种用于微创离泵左心室重建的新设备已经开发出来,目前正在进行2期临床试验。参考文献Dor V.重建左心室手术治疗缺血性无活动性扩张。塞米恩胸心血管外科1997;9:139–145.Athanasuleas CL、Buckberg GD、Stanley AW、Siler W、Dor V、Di Donato M、Menicanti L、Almeida de Oliveira S、Beyersdorf F、Kron IL、Suma H、Kouchoukos NT、Moore W、McCarthy PM、Oz MC、Fontan F、Scott ML、Accola KA;RESTORE组。外科心室修复术治疗梗死后心室扩张引起的充血性心力衰竭。《美国心血管杂志》2004;44:1439–1445.Jones RH、Velazquez EJ、Michler RE、Sopko G、Oh JK、O’Connor CM、Hill JA、Menicanti L、Sadowski Z、Desvigne Nickens P、Rouleau JL、Lee KL;STICH假说2研究者。冠状动脉搭桥术,带或不带心室重建手术。《新英格兰医学杂志》2009;360:1705–1717。Buckberg GD,Athanasuleas CL。STICH试验:误导性结论。胸心血管外科杂志2009;138:1060–1064.Michler RE、Rouleau JL、Al Khalidi HR、Bonow RO、Pellikka PA、Pohost GM、Holly TA、Oh JK、Dagenais F、Milano C、Wrobel K、Pirk J、Ali IS、Jones RH、Velazquez EJ、Lee KL、Di Donato M;STICH审判调查员。STICH试验的见解:冠状动脉搭桥术后左心室大小的变化,有无外科心室重建。《胸心血管外科杂志》2013;146:1139–1145。Dor V,Civaia F,Alexandrescu C,Sabatier M,Montiglio F.缺血性心力衰竭外科治疗(STICH)试验外患者左心室重建的良好效果。胸心血管外科杂志2011;141:905–916。Calafiore AM、Iaco’AL、Kheillah H、Sheikh AA、AL Sayed H、El Rasheed M、Allam A、Awadi MO、Alfonso JJ、Osman AA、Di Mauro M。STICH试验后左心室手术重塑的结果。Eur J Cardiothorac Surg 2016;50:693–701.Yancy CW、Jessup M、Bozkurt B、Butler J、Casey DE Jr、Drazner MH、Fonarow GC、Geraci SA、Horwich T、Januzzi JL、Johnson MR、Kasper EK、Levy WC、Masoudi FA、McBride PE、McMurray JJ、Mitchell JE、Peterson PN、Riegel B、Sam F、Stevenson LW、Tang WH、Tsai EJ、Wilkoff BL;美国心脏病学会基金会;美国心脏协会实践指南工作组。2013年ACCF/AHA心力衰竭管理指南:美国心脏病学会基金会/美国心脏协会实践指南工作组的报告。《美国心血管杂志》2013;62:e147-239。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heart Asia
Heart Asia Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
2.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书