“Undoing the Laws of the Universe”: Reading Jeanne-Marie Jackson’s The African Novel of Ideas after #FeesMustFall

IF 0.3 3区 文学 0 LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM
Simon van Schalkwyk
{"title":"“Undoing the Laws of the Universe”: Reading Jeanne-Marie Jackson’s The African Novel of Ideas after #FeesMustFall","authors":"Simon van Schalkwyk","doi":"10.1017/pli.2021.50","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"On October 12, 2016, #FeesMustFall student leaders at the University of Cape Town gathered to discuss the decolonization of science. A video-recording of this event offers an illuminating perspective of the high-stakes involved in the decolonial debate: “If I personally were committed to enforcing decolonization,” declares the primary speaker, “science as a whole is a product of Western modernity and the whole thing should be scratched off.”1 Despite the ensuing laughter, the speaker continues, insisting that “we have to restart science from... an African perspective, from our perspective of how we’ve experienced science.”2 She then proceeds to develop this idea with reference to a place in Kwazulu-Natal where people believe that it is possible, through black magic or witchcraft, “to send lightning to strike someone,” before clinching her pointwith the challenging question: “Can you explain that scientifically?”3 Amid the concatenation of voices raised either in affirmation or protest in response to the speaker’s claim, a member of the audience can be heard saying, “It’s not true.”4 At this point, the chair calls the audience to order and addresses the voice of dissent directly. “When we started this,” she begins, “we agreed on","PeriodicalId":42913,"journal":{"name":"Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry","volume":"9 1","pages":"263 - 272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cambridge Journal of Postcolonial Literary Inquiry","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/pli.2021.50","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERARY THEORY & CRITICISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

On October 12, 2016, #FeesMustFall student leaders at the University of Cape Town gathered to discuss the decolonization of science. A video-recording of this event offers an illuminating perspective of the high-stakes involved in the decolonial debate: “If I personally were committed to enforcing decolonization,” declares the primary speaker, “science as a whole is a product of Western modernity and the whole thing should be scratched off.”1 Despite the ensuing laughter, the speaker continues, insisting that “we have to restart science from... an African perspective, from our perspective of how we’ve experienced science.”2 She then proceeds to develop this idea with reference to a place in Kwazulu-Natal where people believe that it is possible, through black magic or witchcraft, “to send lightning to strike someone,” before clinching her pointwith the challenging question: “Can you explain that scientifically?”3 Amid the concatenation of voices raised either in affirmation or protest in response to the speaker’s claim, a member of the audience can be heard saying, “It’s not true.”4 At this point, the chair calls the audience to order and addresses the voice of dissent directly. “When we started this,” she begins, “we agreed on
“推翻宇宙法则”:在#FeesMustWall之后阅读珍妮·玛丽·杰克逊的《非洲思想小说》
2016年10月12日,开普敦大学的学生领袖齐聚一堂,讨论科学的非殖民化问题。这次会议的视频记录为非殖民化辩论中的高风险提供了一个有启发性的视角:“如果我个人致力于强制执行非殖民化,”主要发言人宣称,“科学作为一个整体是西方现代性的产物,整个东西应该被刮掉。”尽管听众哄堂大笑,演讲者还是坚持说:“我们必须重新开始科学……”从非洲的角度,从我们如何体验科学的角度。然后,她以夸祖鲁-纳塔尔省的一个地方为例,进一步阐述了自己的观点,那里的人们相信,通过黑魔法或巫术,“有可能发出闪电击中某人”,然后她提出了一个具有挑战性的问题:“你能科学地解释这一点吗?”在对演讲者的说法提出肯定或抗议的声音中,可以听到一名听众说:“这不是真的。”这时,主席要求听众保持秩序,并直接解决不同意见。“当我们开始这件事的时候,”她开始说,“我们达成了一致
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信