Between Originalism and Living Constitution – Jack M. Balkin Concept of Interpretation of the Constitution

Dobrochna Minich
{"title":"Between Originalism and Living Constitution – Jack M. Balkin Concept of Interpretation of the Constitution","authors":"Dobrochna Minich","doi":"10.26399/iusnovum.v16.3.2022.30-d.minich","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Summary In this paper, I analyse problem of interpretation of the Constitution in American doctrine. Starting point is the distinction between the concept of Originalism and Living Constitution. The author briefly presents the main assumptions of both concepts. On that background examines the concept by Jack M. Balkin. He described it as Living Originalism. Balkin in his theory combines the best of traditional Originalism and concept of Living Constitution. He combined Dworkin’s “moral reading” of the Constitution with traditional Originalism. For Balkin, Originalism is seen as a initial framework for governance (framework originalism). From Ronald Dworkin, he adopted a distinction between legal rules and legal principles, and the argument that principles express values. Balkin described his concept of Originalism as “method of text and principle”.","PeriodicalId":33501,"journal":{"name":"Ius Novum","volume":"16 1","pages":"130 - 145"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ius Novum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26399/iusnovum.v16.3.2022.30-d.minich","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Summary In this paper, I analyse problem of interpretation of the Constitution in American doctrine. Starting point is the distinction between the concept of Originalism and Living Constitution. The author briefly presents the main assumptions of both concepts. On that background examines the concept by Jack M. Balkin. He described it as Living Originalism. Balkin in his theory combines the best of traditional Originalism and concept of Living Constitution. He combined Dworkin’s “moral reading” of the Constitution with traditional Originalism. For Balkin, Originalism is seen as a initial framework for governance (framework originalism). From Ronald Dworkin, he adopted a distinction between legal rules and legal principles, and the argument that principles express values. Balkin described his concept of Originalism as “method of text and principle”.
在原始主义与活宪法之间——杰克·巴尔金的宪法解释观
在本文中,我分析了美国学说中的宪法解释问题。其出发点是对原始主义和生活宪法概念的区分。作者简要介绍了这两个概念的主要假设。在这种背景下,杰克·M·巴尔金研究了这一概念。他将其描述为“活的原创主义”。巴尔金在其理论中融合了传统原始主义的精华和生存宪法的概念。他将德沃金对宪法的“道德解读”与传统的原始主义相结合。对巴尔金来说,原创主义被视为治理的初始框架(框架原创主义)。从罗纳德·德沃金那里,他采用了法律规则和法律原则之间的区别,以及原则表达价值观的论点。巴尔金把他的原始主义概念描述为“文本和原则的方法”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信