Fraud Hexagon: Detection of Fraud of Financial Report in State-owned Enterprises in Indonesia

Sudrajat Sudrajat, Nyoman Adhi Suryadnyana, T. Supriadi
{"title":"Fraud Hexagon: Detection of Fraud of Financial Report in State-owned Enterprises in Indonesia","authors":"Sudrajat Sudrajat, Nyoman Adhi Suryadnyana, T. Supriadi","doi":"10.28986/jtaken.v9i1.1358","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to identify the potential for fraudulent financial reporting using the Fraud Hexagon approach with pressure, capability, collusion, opportunity, rationalization, and ego indicators. The population in this study is state-owned companies with observations for 12 years, from 2010 to 2021, and uses regression analysis with SPSS tools to test the Hypothesis. The results showed that pressure and ego could detect the potential for fraudulent financial reporting. There is a tendency for management to report conditions that are different from the actual conditions when under pressure in the form of performance targets that are not supported by the resources they have. CEO duality also provides an excellent opportunity for fraudulent financial reporting practices because when there is a  position war, there is no cross-check between departments, so other parts cannot detect the potential fraud committed by the CEO. This condition also indicates weak control processes that provide wider opportunities for fraudulent financial reporting. At the same time, variables of ability, collusion, opportunity, and rationalization cannot detect financial statement fraud. This condition is because state-owned companies are required to implement the Minister of Finance Regulation number PER-11/MBU/07/2021 and the Financial Services Authority number 13/POJK.03/2017 as the basis for the implementation of Good Corporate Governance so that it is possible to commit financial reporting fraud very small.","PeriodicalId":31962,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Tata Kelola dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Tata Kelola dan Akuntabilitas Keuangan Negara","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.28986/jtaken.v9i1.1358","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This study aims to identify the potential for fraudulent financial reporting using the Fraud Hexagon approach with pressure, capability, collusion, opportunity, rationalization, and ego indicators. The population in this study is state-owned companies with observations for 12 years, from 2010 to 2021, and uses regression analysis with SPSS tools to test the Hypothesis. The results showed that pressure and ego could detect the potential for fraudulent financial reporting. There is a tendency for management to report conditions that are different from the actual conditions when under pressure in the form of performance targets that are not supported by the resources they have. CEO duality also provides an excellent opportunity for fraudulent financial reporting practices because when there is a  position war, there is no cross-check between departments, so other parts cannot detect the potential fraud committed by the CEO. This condition also indicates weak control processes that provide wider opportunities for fraudulent financial reporting. At the same time, variables of ability, collusion, opportunity, and rationalization cannot detect financial statement fraud. This condition is because state-owned companies are required to implement the Minister of Finance Regulation number PER-11/MBU/07/2021 and the Financial Services Authority number 13/POJK.03/2017 as the basis for the implementation of Good Corporate Governance so that it is possible to commit financial reporting fraud very small.
舞弊六边形:印尼国有企业财务报告舞弊的侦查
本研究旨在利用舞弊六边形方法,通过压力、能力、合谋、机会、合理化和自我指标,识别舞弊财务报告的可能性。本研究的人群为国有企业,观察时间为12年,从2010年到2021年,并使用SPSS工具进行回归分析来检验假设。结果表明,压力和自我可以检测出财务报告舞弊的可能性。当管理层面临压力时,他们倾向于报告与实际情况不同的情况,其表现形式是他们所拥有的资源无法支持的绩效目标。CEO的双重身份也为欺诈性财务报告提供了绝佳的机会,因为当存在职位战时,部门之间没有交叉检查,因此其他部门无法发现CEO可能犯下的欺诈行为。这种情况还表明控制过程薄弱,为虚假财务报告提供了更大的机会。同时,能力变量、合谋变量、机会变量和合理化变量都无法发现财务报表舞弊。这种情况是因为国有企业必须执行财政部长条例PER-11/MBU/07/2021和金融服务管理局条例13/POJK。2017年3月作为实施良好公司治理的基础,使财务报告舞弊的可能性很小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
18 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信