An app-, web- and social support-based weight loss intervention for adults with obesity: the HelpMeDoIt! feasibility RCT

S. Simpson, L. Matthews, J. Pugmire, A. McConnachie, E. McIntosh, Elinor Coulman, Kathryn M Hughes, M. Kelson, S. Morgan-Trimmer, S. Murphy, Olga Utkina-Macaskill, L. Moore
{"title":"An app-, web- and social support-based weight loss intervention for adults with obesity: the HelpMeDoIt! feasibility RCT","authors":"S. Simpson, L. Matthews, J. Pugmire, A. McConnachie, E. McIntosh, Elinor Coulman, Kathryn M Hughes, M. Kelson, S. Morgan-Trimmer, S. Murphy, Olga Utkina-Macaskill, L. Moore","doi":"10.3310/phr08030","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: \nFinding solutions to rising levels of obesity continues to be a major public health focus. Social support has an important role in successful weight loss, and digital interventions can reach a large proportion of the population at low cost. \n \nObjective: \nTo develop and assess the feasibility and acceptability of an application (app), web- and social support-based intervention in supporting adults with obesity to achieve weight loss goals. \n \nDesign: \nStage 1 – intervention development phase involved three focus groups (n = 10) with users, and think-aloud interviews and field testing with another group (n = 28). Stage 2 – the intervention and evaluation methods were explored in a feasibility randomised controlled trial with economic and process evaluation. \n \nSetting: \nGreater Glasgow and Clyde, UK. \n \nParticipants: \nAdults with a body mass index of ≥ 30kg/m2 who owned a smartphone and were interested in losing weight were randomised 2 : 1 (intervention : control) and followed up at 12 months. Recruitment took place in April–October 2016. \n \nInterventions: \nThe intervention group had access to HelpMeDoIt! for 12 months. This encouraged them to (1) set goals, (2) monitor progress and (3) harness social support by inviting ‘helpers’ from their existing social network. The control group received a healthy lifestyle leaflet. \n \nMain outcome measures: \nData from stage 1 informed the intervention design. Key measures in stage 2 assessed the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and trial methods against prespecified progression criteria. Three primary outcomes were explored: body mass index, diet and physical activity. Secondary outcomes included weight, waist and hip circumference, social support, self-efficacy, motivation, mental health, health-related quality of life, NHS resource use, participant-borne costs and intervention costs. Qualitative interviews with participants (n = 26) and helpers (n = 9) explored the feasibility and acceptability of the trial methods and intervention. \n \nResults: \nStage 1 produced (1) a website that provided evidence-based information for lifestyle change and harnessing social support, and (2) an app that facilitated goal-setting, self-monitoring and supportive interaction between participants and their helper(s). Progression criteria were met, demonstrating that the intervention and trial methods were feasible and acceptable. A total of 109 participants (intervention, n = 73; control, n = 36) were recruited, with 84 participants (77%: intervention, 71%; control, 89%) followed up at 12 months. Data were successfully collected for most outcome measures (≥ 82% completion). Participants and helpers were generally positive, although helper engagement with the app was low. Of the 54 (74%) participants who downloaded the app, 48 (89%) used it twice or more, 28 helpers enrolled via the app, and 19 (36%) participants interacted with their helper(s) via the app. Interview data indicated that HelpMeDoIt! prompted support from helpers that often occurred without the helpers using the app. \n \nLimitations: \nEarly technical problems meant that some participants and helpers had difficulty accessing the app. Ethical constraints meant that we were unable to contact helpers directly for interview. \n \nConclusions: \nThe HelpMeDoIt! study demonstrated that a weight loss intervention delivered via an app and a website is feasible and acceptable. Progression criteria were met, supporting further evaluation of the intervention. \n \nFuture work: \nTo further explore (1) the motivation and engagement of helpers, (2) the programme theory and (3) the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the intervention. \n \nTrial registration: \nCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN85615983. \n \nFunding: \nThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme and will be published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 8, No. 3. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.","PeriodicalId":32306,"journal":{"name":"Public Health Research","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-270"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"54","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Public Health Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/phr08030","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 54

Abstract

Background: Finding solutions to rising levels of obesity continues to be a major public health focus. Social support has an important role in successful weight loss, and digital interventions can reach a large proportion of the population at low cost. Objective: To develop and assess the feasibility and acceptability of an application (app), web- and social support-based intervention in supporting adults with obesity to achieve weight loss goals. Design: Stage 1 – intervention development phase involved three focus groups (n = 10) with users, and think-aloud interviews and field testing with another group (n = 28). Stage 2 – the intervention and evaluation methods were explored in a feasibility randomised controlled trial with economic and process evaluation. Setting: Greater Glasgow and Clyde, UK. Participants: Adults with a body mass index of ≥ 30kg/m2 who owned a smartphone and were interested in losing weight were randomised 2 : 1 (intervention : control) and followed up at 12 months. Recruitment took place in April–October 2016. Interventions: The intervention group had access to HelpMeDoIt! for 12 months. This encouraged them to (1) set goals, (2) monitor progress and (3) harness social support by inviting ‘helpers’ from their existing social network. The control group received a healthy lifestyle leaflet. Main outcome measures: Data from stage 1 informed the intervention design. Key measures in stage 2 assessed the feasibility and acceptability of the intervention and trial methods against prespecified progression criteria. Three primary outcomes were explored: body mass index, diet and physical activity. Secondary outcomes included weight, waist and hip circumference, social support, self-efficacy, motivation, mental health, health-related quality of life, NHS resource use, participant-borne costs and intervention costs. Qualitative interviews with participants (n = 26) and helpers (n = 9) explored the feasibility and acceptability of the trial methods and intervention. Results: Stage 1 produced (1) a website that provided evidence-based information for lifestyle change and harnessing social support, and (2) an app that facilitated goal-setting, self-monitoring and supportive interaction between participants and their helper(s). Progression criteria were met, demonstrating that the intervention and trial methods were feasible and acceptable. A total of 109 participants (intervention, n = 73; control, n = 36) were recruited, with 84 participants (77%: intervention, 71%; control, 89%) followed up at 12 months. Data were successfully collected for most outcome measures (≥ 82% completion). Participants and helpers were generally positive, although helper engagement with the app was low. Of the 54 (74%) participants who downloaded the app, 48 (89%) used it twice or more, 28 helpers enrolled via the app, and 19 (36%) participants interacted with their helper(s) via the app. Interview data indicated that HelpMeDoIt! prompted support from helpers that often occurred without the helpers using the app. Limitations: Early technical problems meant that some participants and helpers had difficulty accessing the app. Ethical constraints meant that we were unable to contact helpers directly for interview. Conclusions: The HelpMeDoIt! study demonstrated that a weight loss intervention delivered via an app and a website is feasible and acceptable. Progression criteria were met, supporting further evaluation of the intervention. Future work: To further explore (1) the motivation and engagement of helpers, (2) the programme theory and (3) the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the intervention. Trial registration: Current Controlled Trials ISRCTN85615983. Funding: This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Public Health Research programme and will be published in full in Public Health Research; Vol. 8, No. 3. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
针对肥胖成年人的基于应用程序、网络和社会支持的减肥干预:HelpMeDoIt!可行性RCT
背景:寻找解决肥胖水平上升的方法仍然是公共卫生的主要关注点。社会支持在成功减肥中发挥着重要作用,数字干预可以以低成本惠及大部分人口。目的:开发和评估基于应用程序、网络和社会支持的干预措施的可行性和可接受性,以支持肥胖成年人实现减肥目标。设计:第1阶段-干预发展阶段涉及三个重点小组(n = 10) 与用户,并大声思考与另一组(n = 28)。第2阶段——在一项具有经济和过程评估的可行性随机对照试验中探讨了干预和评估方法。背景:英国大格拉斯哥和克莱德。参与者:体重指数≥ 30公斤/平方米拥有智能手机并对减肥感兴趣的人被随机分配2 : 1(干预 : 对照组),随访12个月。招聘于2016年4月至10月进行。干预措施:干预小组可以访问HelpMeDoIt!为期12个月。这鼓励他们(1)设定目标,(2)监督进展,(3)通过邀请现有社交网络中的“帮助者”来利用社会支持。对照组接受健康生活方式传单。主要结果指标:第1阶段的数据为干预设计提供了依据。第2阶段的关键措施根据预先指定的进展标准评估了干预和试验方法的可行性和可接受性。探讨了三个主要结果:体重指数、饮食和体育活动。次要结果包括体重、腰围和臀围、社会支持、自我效能、动机、心理健康、健康相关的生活质量、NHS资源使用、参与者承担的成本和干预成本。对参与者的定性访谈(n = 26)和助手(n = 9) 探讨了试验方法和干预措施的可行性和可接受性。结果:第一阶段产生了(1)一个网站,为生活方式的改变和利用社会支持提供循证信息,以及(2)一个应用程序,促进参与者和他们的帮助者之间的目标设定、自我监控和支持性互动。符合进展标准,表明干预和试验方法是可行和可接受的。共有109名参与者(干预,n = 73;控制,n = 36),84名参与者(77%:干预组,71%;对照组,89%)在12个月时随访。成功收集了大多数结果测量的数据(≥ 82%完成)。参与者和帮助者总体上是积极的,尽管帮助者对该应用程序的参与度很低。在下载该应用程序的54名(74%)参与者中,48名(89%)参与者使用了两次或两次以上,28名助手通过该应用程序注册,19名(36%)参与者通过该应用与助手互动。访谈数据显示HelpMeDoIt!提示了助手的支持,而助手通常不使用该应用程序。限制:早期的技术问题意味着一些参与者和助手很难访问该应用程序。道德约束意味着我们无法直接联系帮助者进行面试。结论:The HelpMeDoIt!研究表明,通过应用程序和网站进行减肥干预是可行和可接受的。符合进展标准,支持进一步评估干预措施。未来的工作:进一步探讨(1)帮助者的动机和参与度,(2)计划理论,以及(3)干预的有效性和成本效益。试验注册:当前对照试验ISRCTN85615983。资助:该项目由国家卫生研究所公共卫生研究计划资助,并将在《公共卫生研究》上全文发表;第8卷第3期。有关更多项目信息,请访问NIHR期刊图书馆网站。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
审稿时长
46 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书