Species-Area Relationships in Urban Ponds Differ between Wild and Human-Fed Domesticated Birds

IF 0.5 4区 生物学 Q4 ORNITHOLOGY
Maria Paola Di Santo, C. Battisti, G. Carpaneto
{"title":"Species-Area Relationships in Urban Ponds Differ between Wild and Human-Fed Domesticated Birds","authors":"Maria Paola Di Santo, C. Battisti, G. Carpaneto","doi":"10.2326/osj.20.263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract We sampled 70 urban ponds (0.001 to >1 ha) in Rome, Italy, to obtain richness and abundance data for wintering wild birds and domestic birds in relation to pond size. The aim was to test the hypothesis that the species-area relationship differs between wild and domestic birds, with the presence of the latter linked with anthropogenic factors, not pond area. We detected eight domesticated avian taxa and 19 wild species at 26 sites. Whereas there was a significant relationship between the number of wild bird species and pond area, the diversity of domestic taxa appeared not to be correlated with area (power function; Levenberg-Marquardt approach). Species-area relationships showed a lower variance in domestic taxa when compared with wild species. As smaller ponds in urban landscapes can host a higher number of domestic taxa than wild species, there may be implications both for increasing risk of disease transmission and for biodiversity perception among urban citizens.","PeriodicalId":49009,"journal":{"name":"Ornithological Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ornithological Science","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2326/osj.20.263","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORNITHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract We sampled 70 urban ponds (0.001 to >1 ha) in Rome, Italy, to obtain richness and abundance data for wintering wild birds and domestic birds in relation to pond size. The aim was to test the hypothesis that the species-area relationship differs between wild and domestic birds, with the presence of the latter linked with anthropogenic factors, not pond area. We detected eight domesticated avian taxa and 19 wild species at 26 sites. Whereas there was a significant relationship between the number of wild bird species and pond area, the diversity of domestic taxa appeared not to be correlated with area (power function; Levenberg-Marquardt approach). Species-area relationships showed a lower variance in domestic taxa when compared with wild species. As smaller ponds in urban landscapes can host a higher number of domestic taxa than wild species, there may be implications both for increasing risk of disease transmission and for biodiversity perception among urban citizens.
城市池塘中野生鸟类和人工饲养的驯养鸟类的物种-面积关系
摘要我们对意大利罗马的70个城市池塘(0.001至>1公顷)进行了采样,以获得与池塘大小相关的越冬野生鸟类和家禽的丰富度和丰度数据。其目的是检验野生鸟类和家养鸟类之间物种-面积关系不同的假设,后者的存在与人为因素有关,而不是与池塘面积有关。我们在26个地点检测到8个驯养鸟类分类群和19个野生物种。尽管野生鸟类的数量与池塘面积之间存在显著关系,但国内分类群的多样性似乎与面积无关(幂函数;Levenberg-Marquardt方法)。与野生物种相比,国内分类群的物种-区域关系表现出较低的方差。由于城市景观中较小的池塘可以容纳比野生物种更多的国内分类群,这可能对疾病传播风险的增加和城市公民对生物多样性的感知都有影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Ornithological Science
Ornithological Science ORNITHOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Ornithological Science publishes reviews, original articles, short communications and comments covering all aspects of ornithology. Manuscripts are judged on the basis of their contribution of original data and ideas or interpretation. All articles are peer-reviewed by at least two researchers expert in the field of the submitted paper. Manuscript are edited where necessary for clarify and economy. Ornithological Science aims to publish as rapidly as is consistent with the requirements of peer-review and normal publishing constraints.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信