Beyond the modern shapes of the equality principle. Notes for a transition

IF 0.3 Q4 POLITICAL SCIENCE
José María Seco Martínez
{"title":"Beyond the modern shapes of the equality principle. Notes for a transition","authors":"José María Seco Martínez","doi":"10.46661/revintpensampolit.6080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Equality as an historic process of human emancipation, transcends the strictly legal/formal plane. Furthermore, it is enhanced by the “historic” willingness to democratise society and improve people’s lives. This is the materialistic dimension of the principle of equality, this ethical and historical “willingness” based on the production and development of social justice as a criterion and principle for action. Human rights and democracy, with their fighting practices and traditions, cannot be understood today without the idea of equality as a necessary principle. Human rights have always been linked to processes of reaction against inequalities. They have been and remain a reaction to any kind of oppression and/or domination, because human rights, which are rights and are human, are always actions that refer to human beings in need. The fact that they were formally conceived under the umbrella of normative reasoning does not presuppose that they should be conceived exclusively as individual rights, which demand fulfilment in the future, or even as horizons of possibility (idealistic vision), but as ways of life that make human existence – dignified existence – feasible for all people. The idea of equality is, therefore, not possible without this material judgement of existence.","PeriodicalId":53732,"journal":{"name":"Revista Internacional de Pensamiento Politico","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Internacional de Pensamiento Politico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46661/revintpensampolit.6080","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Equality as an historic process of human emancipation, transcends the strictly legal/formal plane. Furthermore, it is enhanced by the “historic” willingness to democratise society and improve people’s lives. This is the materialistic dimension of the principle of equality, this ethical and historical “willingness” based on the production and development of social justice as a criterion and principle for action. Human rights and democracy, with their fighting practices and traditions, cannot be understood today without the idea of equality as a necessary principle. Human rights have always been linked to processes of reaction against inequalities. They have been and remain a reaction to any kind of oppression and/or domination, because human rights, which are rights and are human, are always actions that refer to human beings in need. The fact that they were formally conceived under the umbrella of normative reasoning does not presuppose that they should be conceived exclusively as individual rights, which demand fulfilment in the future, or even as horizons of possibility (idealistic vision), but as ways of life that make human existence – dignified existence – feasible for all people. The idea of equality is, therefore, not possible without this material judgement of existence.
超越了现代形式的平等原则。转换注意事项
平等作为人类解放的历史过程,超越了严格的法律/形式层面。此外,推动社会民主化和改善人民生活的“历史性”意愿也增强了这种能力。这就是平等原则的唯物主义维度,这种基于伦理和历史的“意愿”将社会正义的产生和发展作为行动的标准和原则。今天,如果不把平等作为一项必要原则,就不能理解人权和民主及其斗争做法和传统。人权始终与反对不平等的进程联系在一起。它们一直是并且仍然是对任何形式的压迫和/或统治的反应,因为人权是人权,是人的权利,总是涉及需要帮助的人的行动。它们是在规范推理的保护伞下正式构思出来的,这一事实并不预设它们应该仅仅被设想为需要在未来实现的个人权利,或者甚至是可能性的视野(理想主义的愿景),而是作为使人类生存——有尊严的生存——对所有人都可行的生活方式。因此,没有这种对存在的物质判断,平等的观念是不可能的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
8 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信