Perverse Economies of Intimate and Personal Labour

IF 1.1 Q2 ANTHROPOLOGY
Pooja Satyogi
{"title":"Perverse Economies of Intimate and Personal Labour","authors":"Pooja Satyogi","doi":"10.3167/aia.2021.280108","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In India, the 'unlock' period has allowed some domestic workers to return to work;this comes amidst government advisories of greater risk of contagion generally Drawing on ethnographic work with women domestic workers in the city of Delhi, the article delineates how formalities of social distancing and mask-wearing have begun to infl ect personalised labour relationships in ways that entrench existing hierarchies enabled by caste practices This can be evidenced from a doubling of the idea of contagion -- a culturally polluted person rendered even more pestilential because of contagion, but whose service/s are, nonetheless, needed to disinfect the space of the employer's home With no data set available for assessing whether caste has been a variable in the spread of the coronavirus pandemic, anthropology will have to take up the responsibility of demonstrating that the latter is indeed a social phenomenon [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Anthropology in Action is the property of Berghahn Books and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use This abstract may be abridged No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract (Copyright applies to all Abstracts )","PeriodicalId":43493,"journal":{"name":"Anthropology in Action-Journal for Applied Anthropology in Policy and Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropology in Action-Journal for Applied Anthropology in Policy and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3167/aia.2021.280108","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

In India, the 'unlock' period has allowed some domestic workers to return to work;this comes amidst government advisories of greater risk of contagion generally Drawing on ethnographic work with women domestic workers in the city of Delhi, the article delineates how formalities of social distancing and mask-wearing have begun to infl ect personalised labour relationships in ways that entrench existing hierarchies enabled by caste practices This can be evidenced from a doubling of the idea of contagion -- a culturally polluted person rendered even more pestilential because of contagion, but whose service/s are, nonetheless, needed to disinfect the space of the employer's home With no data set available for assessing whether caste has been a variable in the spread of the coronavirus pandemic, anthropology will have to take up the responsibility of demonstrating that the latter is indeed a social phenomenon [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR] Copyright of Anthropology in Action is the property of Berghahn Books and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use This abstract may be abridged No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract (Copyright applies to all Abstracts )
亲密和个人劳动的反常经济
在印度,“解锁”期允许一些家政工人重返工作岗位;这是在政府警告传染风险更大之际发生的,通常借鉴德里市女性家政工人的民族志工作,这篇文章描述了保持社交距离和戴口罩的形式是如何开始影响个性化的劳动关系的,从而巩固了种姓制度所促成的现有等级制度。这可以从传染观念的双重性中得到证明——一个受文化污染的人因为传染而变得更加瘟疫化,但他的服务,需要对雇主家中的空间进行消毒由于没有可用的数据集来评估种姓是否是冠状病毒大流行传播的一个变量,人类学必须承担证明后者确实是一种社会现象的责任[作者摘要]《人类学在行动》的版权归Berghahn Books所有,未经版权持有人的明确书面许可,其内容不得复制或通过电子邮件发送到多个网站或发布到listserv,或个人使用的电子邮件文章本摘要可能会被删节,对副本的准确性不作任何保证用户应参考材料的原始出版版本以获取完整摘要(版权适用于所有摘要)
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
7
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊介绍: Anthropology in Action (AIA) is a peer-reviewed journal publishing articles, commentaries, research reports, and book reviews in applied anthropology. Contributions reflect the use of anthropological training in policy- or practice-oriented work and foster the broader application of these approaches to practical problems. The journal provides a forum for debate and analysis for anthropologists working both inside and outside academia and aims to promote communication amongst practitioners, academics and students of anthropology in order to advance the cross-fertilisation of expertise and ideas. Recent themes and articles have included the anthropology of welfare, transferring anthropological skills to applied health research, design considerations in old-age living, museum-based anthropology education, cultural identities and British citizenship, feminism and anthropology, and international student and youth mobility.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信