Light sensors assess solar radiation vs. shade exposure of slick- and wild-type Puerto Rican Holstein cows

Q4 Agricultural and Biological Sciences
H. Sánchez-Rodríguez, K. Domenech-Perez
{"title":"Light sensors assess solar radiation vs. shade exposure of slick- and wild-type Puerto Rican Holstein cows","authors":"H. Sánchez-Rodríguez, K. Domenech-Perez","doi":"10.46429/jaupr.v105i1.19634","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Anecdotal data suggest that slick-haired cows (SLICK) graze under solar radiation longer than their wild type-haired (WT) counterparts. However, to the authors’ knowledge, empirical data regarding the suggestion is scarce. This study aimed to use light sensors (HOBO Pendant MX) to study solar radiation exposure. Sensors (attached to a collar) were validated in 20 Holstein cows rotated from shade (0837 to 0906h) to sunlight (0907 to 0932h) and then back to shade (0933 to 1005h). After validation, sensors were used to compare the differences in solar radiation exposure between 10 SLICK and 10 WT Holstein cows. Data were analyzed by the GLIMMIX and FREQ procedures (SAS). Light intensity was greater under solar radiation than during the first (P<0.01) and second (P<0.01) shade periods (51,026.00±682.25; 2,282.40±647.64 and 1,907.27±626.28 lx, respectively). No differences were observed between shade periods (P=0.62). The SLICK cows spent more time under solar radiation than the WT cows (52.67 vs. 47.33%, respectively; P<0.01). Hair coat type and period interacted (P<0.01), with greater light intensities in SLICK than in WT cows under solar radiation (24,702±106.65 vs. 20,518±98.43 lx, respectively); but no differences were observed under shade (1,856±7.03 and 1,793.2±6.53 lx, respectively). The SLICK cows showed greater exposure time to direct solar radiation than their WT counterparts.","PeriodicalId":14937,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Agriculture of The University of Puerto Rico","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Agriculture of The University of Puerto Rico","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46429/jaupr.v105i1.19634","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Anecdotal data suggest that slick-haired cows (SLICK) graze under solar radiation longer than their wild type-haired (WT) counterparts. However, to the authors’ knowledge, empirical data regarding the suggestion is scarce. This study aimed to use light sensors (HOBO Pendant MX) to study solar radiation exposure. Sensors (attached to a collar) were validated in 20 Holstein cows rotated from shade (0837 to 0906h) to sunlight (0907 to 0932h) and then back to shade (0933 to 1005h). After validation, sensors were used to compare the differences in solar radiation exposure between 10 SLICK and 10 WT Holstein cows. Data were analyzed by the GLIMMIX and FREQ procedures (SAS). Light intensity was greater under solar radiation than during the first (P<0.01) and second (P<0.01) shade periods (51,026.00±682.25; 2,282.40±647.64 and 1,907.27±626.28 lx, respectively). No differences were observed between shade periods (P=0.62). The SLICK cows spent more time under solar radiation than the WT cows (52.67 vs. 47.33%, respectively; P<0.01). Hair coat type and period interacted (P<0.01), with greater light intensities in SLICK than in WT cows under solar radiation (24,702±106.65 vs. 20,518±98.43 lx, respectively); but no differences were observed under shade (1,856±7.03 and 1,793.2±6.53 lx, respectively). The SLICK cows showed greater exposure time to direct solar radiation than their WT counterparts.
光传感器评估光滑型和野生型波多黎各荷斯坦奶牛的太阳辐射与阴影暴露
轶事数据表明,光滑毛发的奶牛(slick)在太阳辐射下吃草的时间比野生毛发的奶牛长。然而,据作者所知,关于这一建议的实证数据很少。本研究旨在使用光传感器(HOBO Pendant MX)来研究太阳辐射暴露。传感器(附在项圈上)在20头荷斯坦奶牛身上进行了验证,这些奶牛从阴凉处(0837至0906小时)旋转到阳光下(0907至0932小时),然后返回阴凉处(0933至1005小时)。验证后,使用传感器比较10头SLICK和10头WT荷斯坦奶牛的太阳辐射暴露差异。数据通过GLIMMIX和FREQ程序(SAS)进行分析。在太阳辐射下,光照强度大于第一次(P<0.01)和第二次(P<0.01)遮荫期(分别为51026.00±682.25;2282.40±647.64和1907.27±626.28 lx)。遮荫期之间没有差异(P=0.62)。SLICK奶牛在太阳辐射下的时间比WT奶牛多(分别为52.67%和47.33%;P<0.01)。毛被类型和周期相互作用(P<0.01),SLICK的光强度比WT奶牛在太阳照射下的光强度大(分别为24702±106.65和20518±98.43 lx);但在遮荫下(分别为1856±7.03和1793.2±6.53 lx)无差异。SLICK奶牛比WT奶牛暴露在直接太阳辐射下的时间更长。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The Journal of Agriculture of the University of Puerto Rico issued biannually by the Agricultural Experiment Station of the University of Puerto Rico, Mayagüez Campus, for the publication of articles and research notes by staff members or others, dealing with scientific agriculture in Puerto Rico and elsewhere in the Caribbean and Latin America.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信