Struggle over employees psychological well-being. The politization and depolitization of the debate on employee mental health in the Finnish insurance sector
{"title":"Struggle over employees psychological well-being. The politization and depolitization of the debate on employee mental health in the Finnish insurance sector","authors":"A. Kuokkanen, Pekka Varje, A. Väänänen","doi":"10.1080/17449359.2020.1845741","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article examines the emergence and evolution of the discourse on mental health problems as an occupational health risk in the professional debates among Finnish insurance workers from a historical perspective. Our findings indicate that the mental health discourse was influenced by organizational, cultural and political changes. We also found that the employee’s role and the power relations in the insurance sector influenced the way in which mental health problems were articulated in professional debates. The workplace democratization movement of the 1970s and the increasing power of trade unions paved the way for the recognition and manifestation of employees’ mental ill-health and vice versa, the increase of mental health problems legitimized the activity of the union. In the 1990s and 2000s, however, the individualization trend led to the view that employees themselves were responsible for maintaining and regulating their own mental health and competitiveness, once again limiting their opportunities to express their grievances at the workplace and undermining the solidarity between employees.","PeriodicalId":45724,"journal":{"name":"Management & Organizational History","volume":"15 1","pages":"252 - 272"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17449359.2020.1845741","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Management & Organizational History","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17449359.2020.1845741","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3
Abstract
ABSTRACT This article examines the emergence and evolution of the discourse on mental health problems as an occupational health risk in the professional debates among Finnish insurance workers from a historical perspective. Our findings indicate that the mental health discourse was influenced by organizational, cultural and political changes. We also found that the employee’s role and the power relations in the insurance sector influenced the way in which mental health problems were articulated in professional debates. The workplace democratization movement of the 1970s and the increasing power of trade unions paved the way for the recognition and manifestation of employees’ mental ill-health and vice versa, the increase of mental health problems legitimized the activity of the union. In the 1990s and 2000s, however, the individualization trend led to the view that employees themselves were responsible for maintaining and regulating their own mental health and competitiveness, once again limiting their opportunities to express their grievances at the workplace and undermining the solidarity between employees.
期刊介绍:
Management & Organizational History (M&OH) is a quarterly, peer-reviewed journal that aims to publish high quality, original, academic research concerning historical approaches to the study of management, organizations and organizing. The journal addresses issues from all areas of management, organization studies, and related fields. The unifying theme of M&OH is its historical orientation. The journal is both empirical and theoretical. It seeks to advance innovative historical methods. It facilitates interdisciplinary dialogue, especially between business and management history and organization theory. The ethos of M&OH is reflective, ethical, imaginative, critical, inter-disciplinary, and international, as well as historical in orientation.