Speed Track Events: Development and Validity of Exercise Catalog

Q3 Health Professions
G. Soares, D. Motta-Santos, V. Costa, G. Pedrosa, Ronaldo Silva, Andre Scotti, M. Prudêncio, Reginaldo Gonçalves, Leszek Szmuchrowski
{"title":"Speed Track Events: Development and Validity of Exercise Catalog","authors":"G. Soares, D. Motta-Santos, V. Costa, G. Pedrosa, Ronaldo Silva, Andre Scotti, M. Prudêncio, Reginaldo Gonçalves, Leszek Szmuchrowski","doi":"10.2174/1875399x02114010063","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Sports coaches are guided by empirical evidence at the moment of planning the training loads, and, many times, these loads are not recorded for posterior analysis. A validated scientific instrument could help coaches to plan, register, and analyse sports training load.\n \n \n \n The study aimed to develop and assess the content validity of a catalog of exercises for speed track events.\n \n \n \n Through interviews, a group of expert coaches elaborated a catalog of exercises. Two groups of raters evaluated the content validity of these exercises, producing a coefficient of content validity (CCV) for such validity indicators as clarity of language, practical pertinence and theoretical relevance. Additionally, raters assessed the specificity level of each exercise by deciding if the exercise was general, special or specific to speed track events.\n \n \n \n These CCV results confirmed the content validity of a 75-exercise catalog with satisfactory validity indicators, meaning the exercises are understandable for athletic coaches (CCVCL=0,93), pertinent for speed track training (CCVPP=0,84) and relevant (CCVRT=0,83).\n \n \n \n This catalog may help athletic coaches to plan, implement and analyze their players’ sports training loads.","PeriodicalId":38865,"journal":{"name":"Open Sports Sciences Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Sports Sciences Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2174/1875399x02114010063","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Health Professions","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Sports coaches are guided by empirical evidence at the moment of planning the training loads, and, many times, these loads are not recorded for posterior analysis. A validated scientific instrument could help coaches to plan, register, and analyse sports training load. The study aimed to develop and assess the content validity of a catalog of exercises for speed track events. Through interviews, a group of expert coaches elaborated a catalog of exercises. Two groups of raters evaluated the content validity of these exercises, producing a coefficient of content validity (CCV) for such validity indicators as clarity of language, practical pertinence and theoretical relevance. Additionally, raters assessed the specificity level of each exercise by deciding if the exercise was general, special or specific to speed track events. These CCV results confirmed the content validity of a 75-exercise catalog with satisfactory validity indicators, meaning the exercises are understandable for athletic coaches (CCVCL=0,93), pertinent for speed track training (CCVPP=0,84) and relevant (CCVRT=0,83). This catalog may help athletic coaches to plan, implement and analyze their players’ sports training loads.
速滑项目:运动目录的编制与有效性
体育教练在规划训练负荷时以经验证据为指导,而且很多时候,这些负荷没有被记录下来进行后验分析。一个经过验证的科学仪器可以帮助教练计划、注册和分析运动训练负荷。该研究旨在开发和评估速滑项目练习目录的内容有效性。通过访谈,一组专家教练详细阐述了一系列练习。两组评分者对这些练习的内容有效性进行了评估,得出了语言清晰度、实践针对性和理论相关性等有效性指标的内容有效系数(CCV)。此外,评分者通过决定每项运动是一般性的、特殊性的还是速度跑道项目的特异性来评估每项运动的特异性水平。这些CCV结果证实了75项运动目录的内容有效性,其有效性指标令人满意,这意味着这些运动对运动教练来说是可以理解的(CCVCL=0.93),与速度跑道训练相关(CCVPP=0.84)和相关(CCVRT=0.83)。该目录可以帮助体育教练计划、实施和分析运动员的运动训练负荷。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Sports Sciences Journal
Open Sports Sciences Journal Health Professions-Physical Therapy, Sports Therapy and Rehabilitation
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信