Amy McRae BPharm, MPharm, Linda Velta Graudins BPharm, Dip Hosp Pharm, PostGrad Clin Epid, FSHPA, Adv Prac Pharm, Wendy Jane Ewing BPharm, Thuy Bui BPharm, MClinPharm, FSHP, Glenn Downey MBBS, FANZCA, David Edmund Piers Bramley MBBS, MPH, FANZCA, Michael J. Dooley BPharm, GradDipHospPharm, PhD, FSHP, FISOPP, FAAQHC, Adv Prac Pharm
{"title":"Time for change: improving neuromuscular blocking agent safety in Australia","authors":"Amy McRae BPharm, MPharm, Linda Velta Graudins BPharm, Dip Hosp Pharm, PostGrad Clin Epid, FSHPA, Adv Prac Pharm, Wendy Jane Ewing BPharm, Thuy Bui BPharm, MClinPharm, FSHP, Glenn Downey MBBS, FANZCA, David Edmund Piers Bramley MBBS, MPH, FANZCA, Michael J. Dooley BPharm, GradDipHospPharm, PhD, FSHP, FISOPP, FAAQHC, Adv Prac Pharm","doi":"10.1002/jppr.1864","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Incidents involving mis-selection and administration of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) leading to patient harm resulted in the initiation of activity in Victorian hospitals to review the management of this high-risk group of medicines. Local risk mitigation strategies, such as in-house labelling and restricting access, were considered partially effective, but it was recognised that a national approach was required. In 2015, hospital pharmacists — together with anaesthetist colleagues and peak patient safety organisations — made a submission to the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) describing safety risks with NMBAs, with recommendations for improved NMBA labelling. This report describes the five-year process which eventually led to the TGA mandating manufacturers to place alert labelling on NMBA products. As a result of this effort, a Victorian Therapeutics Advisory Group (VicTAG) grant enabled the development of a ‘NMBA Safer Practice Advisory Tool for Australian Hospitals’, providing a standard guide to monitor the safe use of NMBAs.</p>","PeriodicalId":16795,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jppr.1864","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jppr.1864","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
Abstract
Incidents involving mis-selection and administration of neuromuscular blocking agents (NMBAs) leading to patient harm resulted in the initiation of activity in Victorian hospitals to review the management of this high-risk group of medicines. Local risk mitigation strategies, such as in-house labelling and restricting access, were considered partially effective, but it was recognised that a national approach was required. In 2015, hospital pharmacists — together with anaesthetist colleagues and peak patient safety organisations — made a submission to the Therapeutic Goods Administration (TGA) describing safety risks with NMBAs, with recommendations for improved NMBA labelling. This report describes the five-year process which eventually led to the TGA mandating manufacturers to place alert labelling on NMBA products. As a result of this effort, a Victorian Therapeutics Advisory Group (VicTAG) grant enabled the development of a ‘NMBA Safer Practice Advisory Tool for Australian Hospitals’, providing a standard guide to monitor the safe use of NMBAs.
期刊介绍:
The purpose of this document is to describe the structure, function and operations of the Journal of Pharmacy Practice and Research, the official journal of the Society of Hospital Pharmacists of Australia (SHPA). It is owned, published by and copyrighted to SHPA. However, the Journal is to some extent unique within SHPA in that it ‘…has complete editorial freedom in terms of content and is not under the direction of the Society or its Council in such matters…’. This statement, originally based on a Role Statement for the Editor-in-Chief 1993, is also based on the definition of ‘editorial independence’ from the World Association of Medical Editors and adopted by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors.