Gender balance and geographical diversity in editorial boards of Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta and Chemical Geology

Q2 Social Sciences
O. Pourret, P. Anand, P. Bots, E. Cottrell, A. Dosseto, A. Gunter, D. Hedding, D. Ibarra, Dasapta Erwin Irawan, K. Johannesson, J. Labidi, S. Little, Haiyan Liu, T. Makhubela, Johanna Marin Carbonne, A. Perez-Fodich, A. Riches, R. Tartèse, A. Tripati
{"title":"Gender balance and geographical diversity in editorial boards of Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta and Chemical Geology","authors":"O. Pourret, P. Anand, P. Bots, E. Cottrell, A. Dosseto, A. Gunter, D. Hedding, D. Ibarra, Dasapta Erwin Irawan, K. Johannesson, J. Labidi, S. Little, Haiyan Liu, T. Makhubela, Johanna Marin Carbonne, A. Perez-Fodich, A. Riches, R. Tartèse, A. Tripati","doi":"10.3897/ese.2022.e89470","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Members of editorial boards of academic journals are often considered gatekeepers of knowledge and role models for the academic community. Editorial boards should be sufficiently diverse in the background of their members to facilitate publishing manuscripts representing a wide range of research paradigms, methods, and cultural perspectives.\n Objectives: To critically evaluate changes in the representation of binary gender and geographic diversity over time on the editorial boards of Chemical Geology and Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, flagship geochemistry journals, respectively, from the European Association of Geochemistry and the Geochemical Society – Meteoritical Society partnership.\n Methods: The composition of editorial boards was ascertained as given in the first issue of each year, over 1965–2021 for Chemical Geology and 1950–2021 for Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, and members of the editorial boards were coded for their country of affiliation (the country of origin may have been different) and for their binary gender.\n Results: Gender parity, limited to men and women, and the number of countries of affiliation increased steadily between the late 1980s and 2021. However, the geographic distribution remained dominated by affiliations from North America and Western Europe. The editor-in-chief or board of editors had a significant impact on the diversity of the editorial boards, and both geographic and gender diversity may evolve with nearly every newly appointed editor. However, the persistently substantial under-representation on editorial boards of affiliations outside North America and Europe is of concern and needs to be the focus of active recruitment and ongoing monitoring. This approach will ensure that traditionally low geographic diversity is increased and maintained in the future.\n Conclusion: Improving diversity and inclusion of editorial boards of academic journals and strengthening journal and disciplinary reputations are mutually reinforcing. Instituting a rotating editorship with emphasis on embedding broader geographic networks and more equitable international recruitment could ensure sustained and wider geographic representation and gender balance of editorial boards and promote originality and quality of published research, representing our global communities.","PeriodicalId":35360,"journal":{"name":"European Science Editing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Science Editing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/ese.2022.e89470","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Members of editorial boards of academic journals are often considered gatekeepers of knowledge and role models for the academic community. Editorial boards should be sufficiently diverse in the background of their members to facilitate publishing manuscripts representing a wide range of research paradigms, methods, and cultural perspectives. Objectives: To critically evaluate changes in the representation of binary gender and geographic diversity over time on the editorial boards of Chemical Geology and Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, flagship geochemistry journals, respectively, from the European Association of Geochemistry and the Geochemical Society – Meteoritical Society partnership. Methods: The composition of editorial boards was ascertained as given in the first issue of each year, over 1965–2021 for Chemical Geology and 1950–2021 for Geochimica et Cosmochimica Acta, and members of the editorial boards were coded for their country of affiliation (the country of origin may have been different) and for their binary gender. Results: Gender parity, limited to men and women, and the number of countries of affiliation increased steadily between the late 1980s and 2021. However, the geographic distribution remained dominated by affiliations from North America and Western Europe. The editor-in-chief or board of editors had a significant impact on the diversity of the editorial boards, and both geographic and gender diversity may evolve with nearly every newly appointed editor. However, the persistently substantial under-representation on editorial boards of affiliations outside North America and Europe is of concern and needs to be the focus of active recruitment and ongoing monitoring. This approach will ensure that traditionally low geographic diversity is increased and maintained in the future. Conclusion: Improving diversity and inclusion of editorial boards of academic journals and strengthening journal and disciplinary reputations are mutually reinforcing. Instituting a rotating editorship with emphasis on embedding broader geographic networks and more equitable international recruitment could ensure sustained and wider geographic representation and gender balance of editorial boards and promote originality and quality of published research, representing our global communities.
《地球化学与宇宙化学学报》和《化学地质学》编委会中的性别平衡和地域多样性
背景:学术期刊编辑委员会的成员通常被认为是知识的看门人和学术界的榜样。编辑委员会成员的背景应该足够多样化,以便于出版代表广泛研究范式、方法和文化视角的手稿。目的:批判性地评估欧洲地球化学协会和地球化学学会-陨石学会伙伴关系的旗舰地球化学期刊《化学地质学》和《地球化学与宇宙化学学报》编委会上二元性别和地理多样性的代表性随时间的变化。方法:根据每年第一期《化学地质学》和《地球化学与宇宙化学学报》分别于1965年至2021年和1950年至2021年间确定编委会的组成,编委会成员根据其隶属国(原籍国可能不同)和二元性别进行编码。结果:在20世纪80年代末至2021年期间,仅限于男性和女性的性别平等以及所属国家的数量稳步增加。然而,地理分布仍然由北美和西欧的附属机构主导。总编辑或编辑委员会对编辑委员会的多样性产生了重大影响,几乎每一位新任命的编辑都可能出现地域和性别多样性的变化。然而,北美和欧洲以外的附属机构编辑委员会中的代表性持续严重不足,这令人担忧,需要成为积极招聘和持续监测的重点。这种方法将确保传统上较低的地理多样性在未来得到增加和保持。结论:提高学术期刊编辑委员会的多样性和包容性与加强期刊和学科声誉是相辅相成的。设立一个轮值编辑职位,重点是建立更广泛的地理网络和更公平的国际招聘,可以确保编辑委员会的持续和更广泛的地域代表性和性别平衡,并促进代表我们全球社区的已发表研究的原创性和质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
European Science Editing
European Science Editing Social Sciences-Communication
CiteScore
1.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: EASE"s journal, European Science Editing , publishes articles, reports meetings, announces new developments and forthcoming events, reviews books, software and online resources, and highlights publications of interest to members.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信