Safety Risk Assessment in the Tile Industry with a New Approach

M. Khandan, Mohammad Jafari, A. Koohpaei, Zeinab Hosseinzadeh, Abbas Sadeghi
{"title":"Safety Risk Assessment in the Tile Industry with a New Approach","authors":"M. Khandan, Mohammad Jafari, A. Koohpaei, Zeinab Hosseinzadeh, Abbas Sadeghi","doi":"10.34172/ahs.12.1.10.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background & Aims: Despite the relative comfort and welfare today’s modern technology has brought to humankind, it has also been the basis for the emergence of risks and threats. These risks and risk factors should be assessed and controlled using systematic risk assessment and management methods. Numerous techniques and methods have been developed to analyze risks, each of which has its own strengths and weaknesses. One of the system risk analysis techniques, which is among qualitative techniques and identifies and analyzes system risks inductively, is the functional hazard analysis (FuHA) technique. The present study aims to identify and control risks that occur due to technical defects or system dysfunctions and can lead to an unpleasant event, as occurred in an industrial unit in 2016. Methods: In this cross-sectional analytical study, the functional risks of an industrial unit were analyzed using the FuHA technique. By implementing the FuHA technique in the investigated industrial unit, 17 functional defects were identified. Results: In general, according to the level of severity of different consequences caused by the identified defects, 60 functional risks were identified, of which 7 cases (11.67%) were assessed as unacceptable, 17 cases (28.33%) as unfavorable, and 36 cases (60%) as acceptable but needing revision. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that the FuHA technique had a favorable ability to identify and analyze system and subsystem functional risks, especially software subsystems.","PeriodicalId":8299,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Hygiene Sciences","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Hygiene Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.34172/ahs.12.1.10.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background & Aims: Despite the relative comfort and welfare today’s modern technology has brought to humankind, it has also been the basis for the emergence of risks and threats. These risks and risk factors should be assessed and controlled using systematic risk assessment and management methods. Numerous techniques and methods have been developed to analyze risks, each of which has its own strengths and weaknesses. One of the system risk analysis techniques, which is among qualitative techniques and identifies and analyzes system risks inductively, is the functional hazard analysis (FuHA) technique. The present study aims to identify and control risks that occur due to technical defects or system dysfunctions and can lead to an unpleasant event, as occurred in an industrial unit in 2016. Methods: In this cross-sectional analytical study, the functional risks of an industrial unit were analyzed using the FuHA technique. By implementing the FuHA technique in the investigated industrial unit, 17 functional defects were identified. Results: In general, according to the level of severity of different consequences caused by the identified defects, 60 functional risks were identified, of which 7 cases (11.67%) were assessed as unacceptable, 17 cases (28.33%) as unfavorable, and 36 cases (60%) as acceptable but needing revision. Conclusion: The results of this study showed that the FuHA technique had a favorable ability to identify and analyze system and subsystem functional risks, especially software subsystems.
一种新的瓷砖行业安全风险评估方法
背景与目的:尽管现代技术给人类带来了相对舒适和福利,但它也是风险和威胁出现的基础。这些风险和风险因素应使用系统的风险评估和管理方法进行评估和控制。已经开发了许多分析风险的技术和方法,每种技术和方法都有自己的优势和劣势。系统风险分析技术中的一种是功能危害分析技术,它是定性技术之一,可以归纳识别和分析系统风险。本研究旨在识别和控制由于技术缺陷或系统功能障碍而发生的风险,这些风险可能会导致不愉快的事件,如2016年发生在一个工业装置中的事件。方法:在这项横断面分析研究中,使用FuHA技术分析了一个工业单元的功能风险。通过在所调查的工业装置中实施FuHA技术,识别出17个功能缺陷。结果:总的来说,根据已识别缺陷造成的不同后果的严重程度,识别出60种功能风险,其中7例(11.67%)被评估为不可接受,17例(28.33%)被评定为不利,36例(60%)被评估为由可接受但需要修正。结论:本研究结果表明,FuHA技术具有良好的识别和分析系统和子系统功能风险的能力,尤其是软件子系统。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
2 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信