Characterizing a Focused Landscape of Familial Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Inimary T. Toby, N. Thomas, N. Thorenoor, Debbie Spear, S. Diangelo, J. Floros
{"title":"Characterizing a Focused Landscape of Familial Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome","authors":"Inimary T. Toby, N. Thomas, N. Thorenoor, Debbie Spear, S. Diangelo, J. Floros","doi":"10.21203/rs.2.13330/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Background Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) affects approximately 190,600 patients per year in the United States, with mortality up to 45%. ARDS can occur as primary disease due to various factors (e.g. bacterial or viral pneumonia, gastric aspiration, lung contusion, toxic inhalation, and near drowning) or as secondary disease due to sepsis, pancreatitis, severe trauma, massive blood transfusion, and burn. We hypothesized that ARDS-affected individuals have patterns of variants in their physiological repertoire that can be tracked and utilized to complement clinical diagnosis and/or clinical monitoring. Methods The goals of this study were to: (1) characterize the landscape of variants within protein coding but we also studied UTR regions in ARDS using an Exome sequencing approach; (2), determine the variations in signaling pathways across ARDS; and (3) use computational approaches to explore the functional consequences of ARDS. Towards this we assessed an ARDS-affected individual in the context of unaffected individuals from the same family as well as unrelated ARDS cases, in order to elucidate underlying inheritance patterns of “private variants”. Private variants consist of variants shared by ARDS cases but not found in unaffected individuals. Results Whole exome sequencing yielded 3,516 variants represented by 2,354 genes. Of these, 128 variants were shared across all ARDS cases. Of these, there were 24 unique variants represented by 9 ARDS genes shared by the primary ARDS-case and unrelated individuals with ARDS. The overall genes identified and subsequent analysis, demonstrate that there are important biological pathways that distinguish ARDS cases from or from non-ARDS. These pathways include: cell-to-cell signaling interaction, cell growth and proliferation and cell morphology. The data also show a coordinated effort amongst biological processes such as liver hyperproliferation and cell death that underlie the pathogenesis of ARDS. Conclusions These in-silico discoveries demonstrate a role for private variants shared by ARDS cases to be leveraged as biomarkers for clinical diagnosis and/or monitoring of ARDS.","PeriodicalId":93081,"journal":{"name":"Biomarkers and applications","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomarkers and applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.2.13330/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) affects approximately 190,600 patients per year in the United States, with mortality up to 45%. ARDS can occur as primary disease due to various factors (e.g. bacterial or viral pneumonia, gastric aspiration, lung contusion, toxic inhalation, and near drowning) or as secondary disease due to sepsis, pancreatitis, severe trauma, massive blood transfusion, and burn. We hypothesized that ARDS-affected individuals have patterns of variants in their physiological repertoire that can be tracked and utilized to complement clinical diagnosis and/or clinical monitoring. Methods The goals of this study were to: (1) characterize the landscape of variants within protein coding but we also studied UTR regions in ARDS using an Exome sequencing approach; (2), determine the variations in signaling pathways across ARDS; and (3) use computational approaches to explore the functional consequences of ARDS. Towards this we assessed an ARDS-affected individual in the context of unaffected individuals from the same family as well as unrelated ARDS cases, in order to elucidate underlying inheritance patterns of “private variants”. Private variants consist of variants shared by ARDS cases but not found in unaffected individuals. Results Whole exome sequencing yielded 3,516 variants represented by 2,354 genes. Of these, 128 variants were shared across all ARDS cases. Of these, there were 24 unique variants represented by 9 ARDS genes shared by the primary ARDS-case and unrelated individuals with ARDS. The overall genes identified and subsequent analysis, demonstrate that there are important biological pathways that distinguish ARDS cases from or from non-ARDS. These pathways include: cell-to-cell signaling interaction, cell growth and proliferation and cell morphology. The data also show a coordinated effort amongst biological processes such as liver hyperproliferation and cell death that underlie the pathogenesis of ARDS. Conclusions These in-silico discoveries demonstrate a role for private variants shared by ARDS cases to be leveraged as biomarkers for clinical diagnosis and/or monitoring of ARDS.
家族性急性呼吸窘迫综合征的集中特征
背景在美国,急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)每年影响约190600名患者,死亡率高达45%。ARDS可作为多种因素引起的原发性疾病(如细菌性或病毒性肺炎、胃误吸、肺挫伤、中毒性吸入和差点淹死),也可作为败血症、胰腺炎、严重创伤、大量输血和烧伤引起的继发性疾病。我们假设受ARDS影响的个体在其生理谱系中具有变异模式,这些变异模式可以被跟踪并用于补充临床诊断和/或临床监测。方法本研究的目的是:(1)表征蛋白质编码内变异的景观,但我们也使用外显子组测序方法研究了ARDS中的UTR区域;(2) ,确定ARDS信号通路的变化;以及(3)使用计算方法来探索ARDS的功能后果。为此,我们在来自同一家族的未受影响个体以及无关ARDS病例的背景下评估了受ARDS影响的个体,以阐明“私人变异”的潜在遗传模式。私人变异包括ARDS病例共有的变异,但在未受影响的个体中未发现。结果全外显子组测序得到3516个变异,其中2354个基因为代表。在这些病例中,所有ARDS病例共有128种变异。其中,有24种独特的变体,由原发性ARDS病例和不相关的ARDS患者共享的9个ARDS基因代表。鉴定的总体基因和随后的分析表明,有重要的生物学途径将ARDS病例与非ARDS病例区分开来。这些途径包括:细胞间信号相互作用、细胞生长和增殖以及细胞形态。数据还显示,ARDS发病机制的基础是肝脏过度增殖和细胞死亡等生物学过程之间的协同作用。结论这些计算机上的发现证明了ARDS病例共享的私人变异在作为ARDS临床诊断和/或监测的生物标志物方面的作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信