Machine Habitus: Toward a Sociology of Algorithms

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q4 SOCIOLOGY
Vivian Guetler
{"title":"Machine Habitus: Toward a Sociology of Algorithms","authors":"Vivian Guetler","doi":"10.1177/00943061231191421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There is a race within the technology field to develop machines and AI technologies that mimic humans. Artificial intelligence (AI) and automated systems are transforming human lives and becoming part of our social lives, radically changing the world. Automated systems determine financial transactions, credit risks, labor, hiring, and advertisement, and they recommend what to purchase or watch next. However, while AI has benefits, there is a growing concern about algorithmic discrimination and harm. Scholars and practitioners within the interdisciplinary fields of artificial intelligence, ethics, and society have shown the harms and benefits of AI and society by focusing on biases and discrimination, fairness, accuracy, and societal impacts of the algorithmic systems. For non-technical scholars, understanding AI’s complex and technical aspects can be intimidating and challenging. In Machine Habitus: Toward a Sociology of Algorithms, Massimo Airoldi has taken up this challenge by providing the sociological tools and theories required to study the social implications of algorithms and AI technologies. After all, machines are sociological objects that affect daily lives and hold societies together. Airoldi poses timely sociological questions about AI and society and provides significant theoretical contributions to the new field of the sociology of algorithms. Throughout the book, Airoldi investigates machine learning, algorithms, and AI, which are all automated systems, introducing the reader unfamiliar with these technologies to the complex terms used to explain AI. A necessary addition to the sociology of AI, the book expertly ties together concepts from cultural sociology, computer science, AI research, and Science and Technology Studies. In five chapters, Airoldi provides detailed explanations and examples of algorithmic systems and the problems of bias and inequality. Airoldi builds his work on the classical theoretical framework of Pierre Bourdieu, specifically the concepts of habitus, agents, social fields, structure, and culture to explain contemporary social issues. The book is an inspiration for readers interested in applying Bourdieu’s sociological theory within the techno-social world. For Airoldi, machine habitus is a key mechanism where socialized algorithmic systems reproduce cultural dispositions and social structures. Throughout the book, Airoldi focuses on two key sociological questions: how algorithms are socialized—what he terms the social shaping of algorithms or culture in the code—and how the socialized machines participate in society and reproduce it—the code in the culture. First, Airoldi effectively establishes how culture shapes the codes, how machine learning tools learn from society and, specifically, culture. According to Airoldi, culture in the code occurs when machine learning systems are developed and socialized from user-generated data, design features, and decisions created by machine creators. As such, human behavior in the social world is spread and (re)shaped by algorithmic systems. Airoldi explains how through digital practices and patterns, users unknowingly contribute to the data used to ‘‘train’’ the algorithmic systems developing the machine habitus. Second, Airoldi claims the study of algorithmic systems has a sociological relevance, similar to human socialization—the internalization and learning process of the culture, language, knowledge, and social roles— machine learning algorithms also go through the socialization process. Supervised by their creators, machine learning algorithms are shaped by society, becoming social agents. While algorithms have some benefits, they can lead to bias and discriminatory behavior, mainly when the data inputs and statistical","PeriodicalId":46889,"journal":{"name":"Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews","volume":"52 1","pages":"415 - 416"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Contemporary Sociology-A Journal of Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/00943061231191421","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

There is a race within the technology field to develop machines and AI technologies that mimic humans. Artificial intelligence (AI) and automated systems are transforming human lives and becoming part of our social lives, radically changing the world. Automated systems determine financial transactions, credit risks, labor, hiring, and advertisement, and they recommend what to purchase or watch next. However, while AI has benefits, there is a growing concern about algorithmic discrimination and harm. Scholars and practitioners within the interdisciplinary fields of artificial intelligence, ethics, and society have shown the harms and benefits of AI and society by focusing on biases and discrimination, fairness, accuracy, and societal impacts of the algorithmic systems. For non-technical scholars, understanding AI’s complex and technical aspects can be intimidating and challenging. In Machine Habitus: Toward a Sociology of Algorithms, Massimo Airoldi has taken up this challenge by providing the sociological tools and theories required to study the social implications of algorithms and AI technologies. After all, machines are sociological objects that affect daily lives and hold societies together. Airoldi poses timely sociological questions about AI and society and provides significant theoretical contributions to the new field of the sociology of algorithms. Throughout the book, Airoldi investigates machine learning, algorithms, and AI, which are all automated systems, introducing the reader unfamiliar with these technologies to the complex terms used to explain AI. A necessary addition to the sociology of AI, the book expertly ties together concepts from cultural sociology, computer science, AI research, and Science and Technology Studies. In five chapters, Airoldi provides detailed explanations and examples of algorithmic systems and the problems of bias and inequality. Airoldi builds his work on the classical theoretical framework of Pierre Bourdieu, specifically the concepts of habitus, agents, social fields, structure, and culture to explain contemporary social issues. The book is an inspiration for readers interested in applying Bourdieu’s sociological theory within the techno-social world. For Airoldi, machine habitus is a key mechanism where socialized algorithmic systems reproduce cultural dispositions and social structures. Throughout the book, Airoldi focuses on two key sociological questions: how algorithms are socialized—what he terms the social shaping of algorithms or culture in the code—and how the socialized machines participate in society and reproduce it—the code in the culture. First, Airoldi effectively establishes how culture shapes the codes, how machine learning tools learn from society and, specifically, culture. According to Airoldi, culture in the code occurs when machine learning systems are developed and socialized from user-generated data, design features, and decisions created by machine creators. As such, human behavior in the social world is spread and (re)shaped by algorithmic systems. Airoldi explains how through digital practices and patterns, users unknowingly contribute to the data used to ‘‘train’’ the algorithmic systems developing the machine habitus. Second, Airoldi claims the study of algorithmic systems has a sociological relevance, similar to human socialization—the internalization and learning process of the culture, language, knowledge, and social roles— machine learning algorithms also go through the socialization process. Supervised by their creators, machine learning algorithms are shaped by society, becoming social agents. While algorithms have some benefits, they can lead to bias and discriminatory behavior, mainly when the data inputs and statistical
机器习惯:迈向算法社会学
在科技领域,有一场开发模仿人类的机器和人工智能技术的竞赛。人工智能(AI)和自动化系统正在改变人类的生活,并成为我们社会生活的一部分,从根本上改变了世界。自动化系统决定金融交易、信用风险、劳动力、招聘和广告,并建议下一步购买或观看什么。然而,尽管人工智能有好处,但人们越来越担心算法的歧视和危害。人工智能、伦理和社会等跨学科领域的学者和从业者通过关注算法系统的偏见和歧视、公平性、准确性和社会影响,展示了人工智能和社会的危害和益处。对于非技术学者来说,理解人工智能的复杂和技术方面可能是令人生畏和具有挑战性的。在《机器习惯:迈向算法社会学》一书中,Massimo Airoldi通过提供研究算法和人工智能技术的社会影响所需的社会学工具和理论,接受了这一挑战。毕竟,机器是影响日常生活、维系社会的社会学对象。Airoldi及时提出了关于人工智能和社会的社会学问题,并为算法社会学的新领域提供了重要的理论贡献。在整本书中,Airoldi研究了机器学习、算法和人工智能,这些都是自动化系统,向不熟悉这些技术的读者介绍了用于解释人工智能的复杂术语。作为人工智能社会学的必要补充,这本书将文化社会学、计算机科学、人工智能研究和科学技术研究的概念巧妙地联系在一起。在五章中,Airoldi提供了算法系统和偏见和不平等问题的详细解释和示例。Airoldi将他的作品建立在Pierre Bourdieu的经典理论框架之上,特别是习性(habitus)、代理人(agents)、社会领域(social fields)、结构(structure)和文化(culture)等概念来解释当代社会问题。对于有兴趣将布迪厄的社会学理论应用于技术社会世界的读者来说,这本书是一种灵感。对于Airoldi来说,机器习惯是社会化算法系统再现文化倾向和社会结构的关键机制。在整本书中,Airoldi专注于两个关键的社会学问题:算法是如何社会化的——他称之为算法或代码中的文化的社会塑造——以及社会化的机器如何参与社会并复制它——文化中的代码。首先,Airoldi有效地建立了文化如何塑造代码,机器学习工具如何从社会,特别是文化中学习。根据Airoldi的说法,当机器学习系统从用户生成的数据、设计特征和机器创建者创建的决策中开发和社会化时,代码中的文化就会出现。因此,社会世界中的人类行为是由算法系统传播和(重新)塑造的。Airoldi解释了通过数字实践和模式,用户如何在不知不觉中为用于“训练”算法系统开发机器习惯的数据做出贡献。其次,Airoldi声称算法系统的研究具有社会学意义,类似于人类社会化——文化、语言、知识和社会角色的内化和学习过程——机器学习算法也经历社会化过程。在创造者的监督下,机器学习算法被社会塑造,成为社会代理人。虽然算法有一些好处,但它们可能导致偏见和歧视行为,主要是在数据输入和统计时
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
202
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信