Los privilegios de los acreedores involuntarios dentro del régimen concursal vigente a la luz del fallo ‘Institutos Médicos Antártida’ de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación
{"title":"Los privilegios de los acreedores involuntarios dentro del régimen concursal vigente a la luz del fallo ‘Institutos Médicos Antártida’ de la Corte Suprema de Justicia de la Nación","authors":"Juan Manuel Paniagua","doi":"10.46553/prudentia.95.2023.pp.145-180","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":": This paper addresses the problem that arose in the ruling of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, “Institutos Médicos Antártida s/ bankruptcy s/ verification incident” of 2019, in which the judges of that court granted the actor a privilege outside the system regulated in the bankruptcy and bankruptcy law to a creditor verified as unsecured in the liquidation contest of said hospital. Thus declaring the unconstitutionality of the regime and taking refuge in indefinite concepts, such as the dignity of the human person, leaving aside the fine regulatory plexus on the matter. With the par-ticularity of having dictated, the same court only 5 months before the sentence “French Philanthropic Association [...] s/ bankruptcy s/ inc. credit verification by L.A.R. and others” in a case with multiple similarities, having resolved the constitutionality of the regime, the application of the rules on bankruptcy preferences and the non-granting of the privilege invoked by the plaintiff.","PeriodicalId":36086,"journal":{"name":"Prudentia Iuris","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Prudentia Iuris","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46553/prudentia.95.2023.pp.145-180","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
: This paper addresses the problem that arose in the ruling of the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation, “Institutos Médicos Antártida s/ bankruptcy s/ verification incident” of 2019, in which the judges of that court granted the actor a privilege outside the system regulated in the bankruptcy and bankruptcy law to a creditor verified as unsecured in the liquidation contest of said hospital. Thus declaring the unconstitutionality of the regime and taking refuge in indefinite concepts, such as the dignity of the human person, leaving aside the fine regulatory plexus on the matter. With the par-ticularity of having dictated, the same court only 5 months before the sentence “French Philanthropic Association [...] s/ bankruptcy s/ inc. credit verification by L.A.R. and others” in a case with multiple similarities, having resolved the constitutionality of the regime, the application of the rules on bankruptcy preferences and the non-granting of the privilege invoked by the plaintiff.
本文解决了2019年国家最高法院裁决“Institutos m / s/破产/核查事件”中出现的问题,其中该法院的法官授予行为者在破产和破产法规定的制度之外的特权给在该医院的清算竞争中被证实为无担保的债权人。因此,宣布该政权违宪,并在不确定的概念中寻求庇护,例如人的尊严,将这个问题上的精细监管丛放在一边。随着特殊性的口授,同一法院仅在5个月前判决“法国慈善协会[…]在一个具有多重相似之处的案件中,解决了制度的合宪性,破产优先权规则的适用以及原告所援引的特权的不授予。