{"title":"A Queer Homiletic Futurity: The Radical Sexuality of James Baldwin","authors":"Terrance Dean","doi":"10.1080/14769948.2021.1990494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Examining the afterlife of slavery, mainly interrogating the futurity of black sexuality and contemptuous Black queer bodies as possible identities of radical futurism in a queer homiletic. I position this essay within the framework of a futuristic queer homiletic, such that, Black queer identity reimagines itself within the plane of Afrofuturism disrupting the continuum of heterosexuality, and Black respectability. The futurity of Black queerness re-turns itself into a living bound subject. I make use of James Baldwin and his gender sexual politics as a Black gay man. Drawing upon his semi-autobiographical essay, “Here Be Dragons,” Baldwin illustrates how he was eliminated from his family, primarily by his step-father, who was disgusted by Baldwin's ugliness and dark skin, and moreover, his effeminate and queer mannerisms. Baldwin, feeling “dumped” by his family, was also displaced, or, “removed” from his black community of Harlem because of his sexuality. He seeks refuge in Greenwich Village, a white community which houses many gay clubs and bars. It is here that Baldwin faces a similar reality of being isolated, neglected, and eliminated for not only his queer identity, but his Black skin and Black identity. Baldwin, in public view, renders as a site of failure in that he is unacknowledged because of his Black queer identity and is rendered, or read as disgust, an 'other.' Thus, he is bounded “out” of society, “out” of sight, and ultimately left searching for a place, a home to call his own. Baldwin reimagines himself, a living subject, bound for life. As such, a futuristic queer homiletic enables Black queerness to the center of Black sexuality and Black identity.","PeriodicalId":42729,"journal":{"name":"BLACK THEOLOGY","volume":"19 1","pages":"249 - 267"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BLACK THEOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14769948.2021.1990494","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
ABSTRACT Examining the afterlife of slavery, mainly interrogating the futurity of black sexuality and contemptuous Black queer bodies as possible identities of radical futurism in a queer homiletic. I position this essay within the framework of a futuristic queer homiletic, such that, Black queer identity reimagines itself within the plane of Afrofuturism disrupting the continuum of heterosexuality, and Black respectability. The futurity of Black queerness re-turns itself into a living bound subject. I make use of James Baldwin and his gender sexual politics as a Black gay man. Drawing upon his semi-autobiographical essay, “Here Be Dragons,” Baldwin illustrates how he was eliminated from his family, primarily by his step-father, who was disgusted by Baldwin's ugliness and dark skin, and moreover, his effeminate and queer mannerisms. Baldwin, feeling “dumped” by his family, was also displaced, or, “removed” from his black community of Harlem because of his sexuality. He seeks refuge in Greenwich Village, a white community which houses many gay clubs and bars. It is here that Baldwin faces a similar reality of being isolated, neglected, and eliminated for not only his queer identity, but his Black skin and Black identity. Baldwin, in public view, renders as a site of failure in that he is unacknowledged because of his Black queer identity and is rendered, or read as disgust, an 'other.' Thus, he is bounded “out” of society, “out” of sight, and ultimately left searching for a place, a home to call his own. Baldwin reimagines himself, a living subject, bound for life. As such, a futuristic queer homiletic enables Black queerness to the center of Black sexuality and Black identity.
考察奴隶制的来世,主要探讨黑人性取向的未来和黑人酷儿身体作为酷儿说教中激进未来主义的可能身份。我把这篇文章放在未来酷儿说教的框架中,这样,黑人酷儿身份在非洲未来主义的平面上重新想象自己,破坏了异性恋的连续性,以及黑人的可敬性。黑人酷儿的未来重新变成了一个活生生的被束缚的主体。我利用了詹姆斯·鲍德温和他作为黑人同性恋者的性别政治。鲍德温在他的半自传体散文《龙来了》(Here Be Dragons)中描述了他是如何被家庭抛弃的,主要是被他的继父抛弃的,他的继父厌恶鲍德温的丑陋和黑皮肤,更讨厌他的娘娘腔和奇怪的举止。鲍德温感觉自己被家人“抛弃”了,也因为自己的性取向而被迫离开了他所在的哈莱姆黑人社区。他在格林威治村寻求庇护,这是一个白人社区,那里有许多同性恋俱乐部和酒吧。正是在这里,鲍德温面临着一个类似的现实:不仅因为他的酷儿身份,而且因为他的黑皮肤和黑人身份,他被孤立、被忽视、被淘汰。鲍德温,在公众眼中,被描绘成一个失败的地方因为他的黑人酷儿身份没有得到承认,被描绘成,或者被解读为厌恶,一个"他者"因此,他被束缚在“社会”之外,“视线”之外,最终离开,寻找一个地方,一个属于他自己的家。鲍德温重新想象自己,一个活生生的主体,为生活而奋斗。因此,未来的酷儿说教使黑人酷儿成为黑人性和黑人身份的中心。