Content and Adequacy of Emergency Medicine Point of Care Ultrasound Training: Evaluation of Turkey

IF 0.3 Q4 EMERGENCY MEDICINE
Fatma Selman, Ertuğ Günsoy, Aslıhan Yürüktümen Ünal, Y. Şenol
{"title":"Content and Adequacy of Emergency Medicine Point of Care Ultrasound Training: Evaluation of Turkey","authors":"Fatma Selman, Ertuğ Günsoy, Aslıhan Yürüktümen Ünal, Y. Şenol","doi":"10.4274/eajem.galenos.2022.71224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: With its widespread use for emergency patient care, point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) is included in postgraduate education in Turkey, but its practice may vary depending on the training program. Our study aimed to determine the content of practices regarding PoCUS training in Turkey, and to present a future perspective by revealing the relationship between years of education and competence perceptions. Materials and Methods: This is a descriptive study conducted on emergency medicine students who were still residents approximately 2018-2019. The first part includes demographic data, theoretical and practical training content. The second part is created according to the Likert scale for self-assessment that questions the competence. The survey was conveyed to. Results: In our study, including 249 residents, the participants reported their practical training hours for emergency ultrasound (US) use as 12.5 h, and theoretical training hours as 12.1 h. For all sonographic evaluations, it was found that 10.1% of the practices were performed under the supervision of an academic member. Conclusion: It was found that Emergency Medicine clinics in Turkey had adequate equipment for the use and training of US, residents had a certain level of competence to using US, but there was no regular training with curriculum and assessment criteria in clinics.","PeriodicalId":11814,"journal":{"name":"Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eurasian Journal of Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4274/eajem.galenos.2022.71224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"EMERGENCY MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: With its widespread use for emergency patient care, point-of-care ultrasound (PoCUS) is included in postgraduate education in Turkey, but its practice may vary depending on the training program. Our study aimed to determine the content of practices regarding PoCUS training in Turkey, and to present a future perspective by revealing the relationship between years of education and competence perceptions. Materials and Methods: This is a descriptive study conducted on emergency medicine students who were still residents approximately 2018-2019. The first part includes demographic data, theoretical and practical training content. The second part is created according to the Likert scale for self-assessment that questions the competence. The survey was conveyed to. Results: In our study, including 249 residents, the participants reported their practical training hours for emergency ultrasound (US) use as 12.5 h, and theoretical training hours as 12.1 h. For all sonographic evaluations, it was found that 10.1% of the practices were performed under the supervision of an academic member. Conclusion: It was found that Emergency Medicine clinics in Turkey had adequate equipment for the use and training of US, residents had a certain level of competence to using US, but there was no regular training with curriculum and assessment criteria in clinics.
急诊医学护理点超声培训的内容和充分性——对土耳其的评估
目的:由于其在急诊患者护理中的广泛应用,护理点超声(PoCUS)被纳入土耳其的研究生教育,但其实践可能因培训计划而异。我们的研究旨在确定土耳其PoCUS培训实践的内容,并通过揭示教育年限与能力认知之间的关系,提出未来的观点。材料和方法:这是一项对2018-2019年左右仍为住院医师的急诊医学生进行的描述性研究。第一部分包括人口统计数据、理论和实践培训内容。第二部分是根据Likert量表创建的,用于对能力提出质疑的自我评估。调查被传达给。结果:在我们的研究中,包括249名居民,参与者报告他们使用紧急超声(US)的实际训练时间为12.5小时,理论训练时间为12.1小时。对于所有超声评估,发现10.1%的实践是在一名学术成员的监督下进行的。结论:土耳其急诊医学诊所有足够的US使用和培训设备,居民有一定的US使用能力,但诊所没有定期培训课程和评估标准。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
39
审稿时长
10 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信