Sugarcane Commercialization and Gender Experiences in the Zambian “Sweetest Town”

IF 3.3 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
S. Manda
{"title":"Sugarcane Commercialization and Gender Experiences in the Zambian “Sweetest Town”","authors":"S. Manda","doi":"10.1080/13545701.2022.2079697","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article explores how sugarcane commercialization impacts gender relations, and processes that shape them, using two differently structured outgrower schemes – a settlement scheme and an European Union-driven block farm in southern Zambia. Results show gendered impacts across the schemes are complex and are shaped by diverse cultural arrangements as micro-processes. Intrahousehold patterns of decision making, land, and labor dynamics reveal that changing the structure, organization, and integration of outgrower schemes does not necessarily make them responsive to strategic gender needs. Further, these processes are insufficient in altering pre-existing sociocultural imbalances. Consequently, even where schemes are intentional about being inclusive, they are likely to replicate structural inequalities and fail to engender transformational changes among participants. This article raises the need to address the politics of land and labor relations, and their implications for different social groups within their cultural-historical context. HIGHLIGHTS Gendered impacts of commercial agriculture reflect market and nonmarket dynamics. Schemes amplify preexisting inequalities despite being intentional on inclusivity. Land ownership shapes women’s responses and political reactions in schemes. Inheritance patterns may address land inequalities but more needs to be done. Addressing strategic gender needs requires market and nonmarket interventions.","PeriodicalId":47715,"journal":{"name":"Feminist Economics","volume":"28 1","pages":"254 - 284"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Feminist Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13545701.2022.2079697","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article explores how sugarcane commercialization impacts gender relations, and processes that shape them, using two differently structured outgrower schemes – a settlement scheme and an European Union-driven block farm in southern Zambia. Results show gendered impacts across the schemes are complex and are shaped by diverse cultural arrangements as micro-processes. Intrahousehold patterns of decision making, land, and labor dynamics reveal that changing the structure, organization, and integration of outgrower schemes does not necessarily make them responsive to strategic gender needs. Further, these processes are insufficient in altering pre-existing sociocultural imbalances. Consequently, even where schemes are intentional about being inclusive, they are likely to replicate structural inequalities and fail to engender transformational changes among participants. This article raises the need to address the politics of land and labor relations, and their implications for different social groups within their cultural-historical context. HIGHLIGHTS Gendered impacts of commercial agriculture reflect market and nonmarket dynamics. Schemes amplify preexisting inequalities despite being intentional on inclusivity. Land ownership shapes women’s responses and political reactions in schemes. Inheritance patterns may address land inequalities but more needs to be done. Addressing strategic gender needs requires market and nonmarket interventions.
赞比亚“最甜小镇”的甘蔗商业化与性别体验
本文探讨了甘蔗商业化如何影响性别关系,以及塑造性别关系的过程,采用了两种不同结构的种植者方案——赞比亚南部的定居方案和欧盟推动的块农场。结果表明,这些方案的性别影响是复杂的,并受到不同文化安排的微观过程的影响。决策、土地和劳动力动态的家庭内部模式表明,改变外生者计划的结构、组织和一体化不一定使它们对战略性性别需求作出反应。此外,这些进程不足以改变先前存在的社会文化不平衡。因此,即使计划有意具有包容性,它们也可能复制结构性不平等,无法在参与者中产生转型变化。本文提出了解决土地和劳动关系的政治问题的必要性,以及它们在其文化历史背景下对不同社会群体的影响。商业农业的性别影响反映了市场和非市场的动态。尽管计划有意实现包容性,但仍放大了先前存在的不平等。土地所有权决定了妇女在计划中的反应和政治反应。继承模式可以解决土地不平等问题,但还需要做更多的工作。解决战略性性别需求需要市场和非市场干预。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Feminist Economics
Feminist Economics Multiple-
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
4.30%
发文量
37
期刊介绍: Feminist Economics is a peer-reviewed journal that provides an open forum for dialogue and debate about feminist economic perspectives. By opening new areas of economic inquiry, welcoming diverse voices, and encouraging critical exchanges, the journal enlarges and enriches economic discourse. The goal of Feminist Economics is not just to develop more illuminating theories but to improve the conditions of living for all children, women, and men. Feminist Economics: -Advances feminist inquiry into economic issues affecting the lives of children, women, and men -Examines the relationship between gender and power in the economy and the construction and legitimization of economic knowledge -Extends feminist theoretical, historical, and methodological contributions to economics and the economy -Offers feminist insights into the underlying constructs of the economics discipline and into the historical, political, and cultural context of economic knowledge -Provides a feminist rethinking of theory and policy in diverse fields, including those not directly related to gender -Stimulates discussions among diverse scholars worldwide and from a broad spectrum of intellectual traditions, welcoming cross-disciplinary and cross-country perspectives, especially from countries in the South
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信