Reasons for switching immunomodulatory therapy in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

IF 0.2 Q4 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
M. Popiel, H. Bartosik-Psujek
{"title":"Reasons for switching immunomodulatory therapy in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis","authors":"M. Popiel, H. Bartosik-Psujek","doi":"10.15557/an.2021.0001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: The aim of the study was to assess switching disease-modifying therapy in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Materials and methods: This observational single-centre study involved a retrospective evaluation of data of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis receiving disease-modifying therapy under drug programmes reimbursed by the National Health Fund. Demographic data, the level of disability, disease activity and treatment methods were analysed with a particular emphasis on the reasons for switching the therapy. Results: Data were collected from patients with a mean age of 39.6 years, with women accounting for 68%. Therapy was switched in 32% (n = 118) of patients. In this group, 72% (n = 85) of patients modified their first-line treatment, and 28% (n = 33) required switching to a second-line drug. Treatment failure (52.5%, n = 62), followed by treatment intolerance (47.5%, n = 56) were the main reasons for switching. Patients on first line-treatment mostly required switching from interferon beta-1a, which was usually replaced with dimethyl fumarate and glatiramer acetate. The most common adverse events included skin reactions and needle fatigue, which were the most common reasons for switching treatment due to intolerance. Conclusions: The currently used immunomodulatory treatment is relatively well tolerated, and its failure is a more frequent reason for therapy switching. This indicates the need for diseasemodifying treatments that are highly effective, safe and well tolerated.","PeriodicalId":41161,"journal":{"name":"Aktualnosci Neurologiczne","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aktualnosci Neurologiczne","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15557/an.2021.0001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Aim: The aim of the study was to assess switching disease-modifying therapy in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Materials and methods: This observational single-centre study involved a retrospective evaluation of data of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis receiving disease-modifying therapy under drug programmes reimbursed by the National Health Fund. Demographic data, the level of disability, disease activity and treatment methods were analysed with a particular emphasis on the reasons for switching the therapy. Results: Data were collected from patients with a mean age of 39.6 years, with women accounting for 68%. Therapy was switched in 32% (n = 118) of patients. In this group, 72% (n = 85) of patients modified their first-line treatment, and 28% (n = 33) required switching to a second-line drug. Treatment failure (52.5%, n = 62), followed by treatment intolerance (47.5%, n = 56) were the main reasons for switching. Patients on first line-treatment mostly required switching from interferon beta-1a, which was usually replaced with dimethyl fumarate and glatiramer acetate. The most common adverse events included skin reactions and needle fatigue, which were the most common reasons for switching treatment due to intolerance. Conclusions: The currently used immunomodulatory treatment is relatively well tolerated, and its failure is a more frequent reason for therapy switching. This indicates the need for diseasemodifying treatments that are highly effective, safe and well tolerated.
复发-缓解型多发性硬化症患者转换免疫调节治疗的原因
目的:该研究的目的是评估复发-缓解型多发性硬化症患者的转换疾病改善疗法。材料和方法:本观察性单中心研究对在国家卫生基金报销的药物方案下接受疾病改善治疗的复发-缓解型多发性硬化症患者的资料进行了回顾性评估。对人口数据、残疾程度、疾病活动和治疗方法进行了分析,特别强调了改变治疗方法的原因。结果:数据收集的患者平均年龄为39.6岁,女性占68%。32% (n = 118)的患者改变了治疗。在该组中,72% (n = 85)的患者改变了一线治疗方案,28% (n = 33)的患者需要改用二线药物。治疗失败(52.5%,n = 62),其次是治疗不耐受(47.5%,n = 56)是切换的主要原因。一线治疗的患者大多需要从干扰素β -1a切换,通常用富马酸二甲酯和醋酸格拉替雷默替代。最常见的不良事件包括皮肤反应和针疲劳,这是由于不耐受而切换治疗的最常见原因。结论:目前使用的免疫调节治疗具有较好的耐受性,其治疗失败是切换治疗的更常见原因。这表明需要高效、安全和耐受性良好的治疗方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Aktualnosci Neurologiczne
Aktualnosci Neurologiczne CLINICAL NEUROLOGY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信
小红书