DE-STIGMATISING PSYCHOSOCIAL DISABILITY IN SOUTH AFRICA

IF 0.1 Q4 LAW
F. Mahomed, M. Stein
{"title":"DE-STIGMATISING PSYCHOSOCIAL DISABILITY IN SOUTH AFRICA","authors":"F. Mahomed, M. Stein","doi":"10.29053/2413-7138/2017/V5N1A4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Stigma and associated discrimination against persons with psychosocial disabilities constitute a considerable barrier to the realisation of the highest attainable standard of health in South Africa, Africa, and further afield, constituting a significant human rights violation. This situation is evidenced and exacerbated by mental health as a whole remaining under-prioritised in law, policy and resource allocation. States parties to have a duty to address stigma and discrimination through awareness raising and education. Some important commitments have been made in this respect, particularly at the policy level in South Africa. Nevertheless, and as demonstrated by tragic recent events, effective implementation remains lacking. This article lays out the obligations incumbent upon the South African government to address stigma and discrimination on the basis of psychosocial disability as a public health and human rights imperative by examining positive duties incorporated into international instruments and domestic law and policy. It further considers the role of political de-prioritisation of mental health and how this constitutes stigma of a systemic nature, using case law and examples of research and best practice from South Africa, Africa generally, and beyond. We conclude that South Africa is failing to meet its obligations to persons with psychosocial disabilities, and recommend that positive duties be emphasised in potential disability-specific legislation; high-level political commitment and co-ordination issecured for mental health; the CRPD’s independent monitoring requirement is urgently fulfilled; and contextually-relevant interventions are crafted with the active participation of persons with psychosocial disabilities and their representative organisations. ","PeriodicalId":41087,"journal":{"name":"African Disability Rights Yearbook","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Disability Rights Yearbook","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.29053/2413-7138/2017/V5N1A4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Stigma and associated discrimination against persons with psychosocial disabilities constitute a considerable barrier to the realisation of the highest attainable standard of health in South Africa, Africa, and further afield, constituting a significant human rights violation. This situation is evidenced and exacerbated by mental health as a whole remaining under-prioritised in law, policy and resource allocation. States parties to have a duty to address stigma and discrimination through awareness raising and education. Some important commitments have been made in this respect, particularly at the policy level in South Africa. Nevertheless, and as demonstrated by tragic recent events, effective implementation remains lacking. This article lays out the obligations incumbent upon the South African government to address stigma and discrimination on the basis of psychosocial disability as a public health and human rights imperative by examining positive duties incorporated into international instruments and domestic law and policy. It further considers the role of political de-prioritisation of mental health and how this constitutes stigma of a systemic nature, using case law and examples of research and best practice from South Africa, Africa generally, and beyond. We conclude that South Africa is failing to meet its obligations to persons with psychosocial disabilities, and recommend that positive duties be emphasised in potential disability-specific legislation; high-level political commitment and co-ordination issecured for mental health; the CRPD’s independent monitoring requirement is urgently fulfilled; and contextually-relevant interventions are crafted with the active participation of persons with psychosocial disabilities and their representative organisations. 
南非社会心理残疾的去污名化
在南非、非洲和更远的地方,对心理残疾者的污名和相关歧视构成了实现可达到的最高健康标准的巨大障碍,构成了严重侵犯人权的行为。心理健康作为一个整体在法律、政策和资源分配方面仍然没有得到充分重视,这证明并加剧了这种情况。缔约国有义务通过提高认识和教育解决污名和歧视问题。在这方面作出了一些重要承诺,特别是在南非的政策层面。然而,正如最近发生的悲惨事件所表明的那样,仍然缺乏有效的执行。本条规定了南非政府有义务通过审查纳入国际文书以及国内法律和政策的积极义务,将消除基于心理残疾的污名和歧视作为公共卫生和人权的当务之急。它利用南非、非洲及其他地区的判例法和研究和最佳实践的例子,进一步考虑了心理健康政治非优先化的作用,以及这如何构成系统性的污名。我们得出的结论是,南非未能履行其对心理社会残疾人的义务,并建议在潜在的针对残疾人的立法中强调积极的义务;为心理健康作出高级别的政治承诺和协调;《残疾人权利公约》的独立监测要求急需得到满足;在心理残疾人士及其代表组织的积极参与下,制定了与背景相关的干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
50.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信