Perception and Appreciation of Tactile Objects: The Role of Visual Experience and Texture Parameters†

A. R. Karim, Sanchary Prativa, Lora T. Likova
{"title":"Perception and Appreciation of Tactile Objects: The Role of Visual Experience and Texture Parameters†","authors":"A. R. Karim, Sanchary Prativa, Lora T. Likova","doi":"10.2352/j.percept.imaging.2021.4.2.020405","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This exploratory study was designed to examine the effects of visual experience and specific texture parameters on both discriminative and aesthetic aspects of tactile perception. To this end, the authors conducted two experiments using a novel behavioral (ranking) approach in blind and (blindfolded) sighted individuals. Groups of congenitally blind, late blind, and (blindfolded) sighted participants made relative stimulus preference, aesthetic appreciation, and smoothness or softness judgment of two-dimensional (2D) or three-dimensional (3D) tactile surfaces through active touch. In both experiments, the aesthetic judgment was assessed on three affective dimensions, Relaxation, Hedonics, and Arousal, hypothesized to underlie visual aesthetics in a prior study. Results demonstrated that none of these behavioral judgments significantly varied as a function of visual experience in either experiment. However, irrespective of visual experience, significant differences were identified in all these behavioral judgments across the physical levels of smoothness or softness. In general, 2D smoothness or 3D softness discrimination was proportional to the level of physical smoothness or softness. Second, the smoother or softer tactile stimuli were preferred over the rougher or harder tactile stimuli. Third, the 3D affective structure of visual aesthetics appeared to be amodal and applicable to tactile aesthetics. However, analysis of the aesthetic profile across the affective dimensions revealed some striking differences between the forms of appreciation of smoothness and softness, uncovering unanticipated substructures in the nascent field of tactile aesthetics. While the physically softer 3D stimuli received higher ranks on all three affective dimensions, the physically smoother 2D stimuli received higher ranks on the Relaxation and Hedonics but lower ranks on the Arousal dimension. Moreover, the Relaxation and Hedonics ranks accurately overlapped with one another across all the physical levels of softness/hardness, but not across the physical levels of smoothness/roughness. These findings suggest that physical texture parameters not only affect basic tactile discrimination but differentially mediate tactile preferences, and aesthetic appreciation. The theoretical and practical implications of these novel findings are discussed.","PeriodicalId":73895,"journal":{"name":"Journal of perceptual imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of perceptual imaging","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2352/j.percept.imaging.2021.4.2.020405","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This exploratory study was designed to examine the effects of visual experience and specific texture parameters on both discriminative and aesthetic aspects of tactile perception. To this end, the authors conducted two experiments using a novel behavioral (ranking) approach in blind and (blindfolded) sighted individuals. Groups of congenitally blind, late blind, and (blindfolded) sighted participants made relative stimulus preference, aesthetic appreciation, and smoothness or softness judgment of two-dimensional (2D) or three-dimensional (3D) tactile surfaces through active touch. In both experiments, the aesthetic judgment was assessed on three affective dimensions, Relaxation, Hedonics, and Arousal, hypothesized to underlie visual aesthetics in a prior study. Results demonstrated that none of these behavioral judgments significantly varied as a function of visual experience in either experiment. However, irrespective of visual experience, significant differences were identified in all these behavioral judgments across the physical levels of smoothness or softness. In general, 2D smoothness or 3D softness discrimination was proportional to the level of physical smoothness or softness. Second, the smoother or softer tactile stimuli were preferred over the rougher or harder tactile stimuli. Third, the 3D affective structure of visual aesthetics appeared to be amodal and applicable to tactile aesthetics. However, analysis of the aesthetic profile across the affective dimensions revealed some striking differences between the forms of appreciation of smoothness and softness, uncovering unanticipated substructures in the nascent field of tactile aesthetics. While the physically softer 3D stimuli received higher ranks on all three affective dimensions, the physically smoother 2D stimuli received higher ranks on the Relaxation and Hedonics but lower ranks on the Arousal dimension. Moreover, the Relaxation and Hedonics ranks accurately overlapped with one another across all the physical levels of softness/hardness, but not across the physical levels of smoothness/roughness. These findings suggest that physical texture parameters not only affect basic tactile discrimination but differentially mediate tactile preferences, and aesthetic appreciation. The theoretical and practical implications of these novel findings are discussed.
触觉物体的感知和欣赏:视觉体验和纹理参数的作用†
这项探索性研究旨在检验视觉体验和特定纹理参数对触觉的辨别和审美方面的影响。为此,作者使用一种新的行为(排名)方法在盲人和(蒙眼)视力者中进行了两项实验。先天性失明、晚期失明和(蒙眼)失明的参与者通过主动触摸对二维(2D)或三维(3D)触觉表面进行相对刺激偏好、审美欣赏和平滑度或柔软度判断。在这两个实验中,审美判断都是在三个情感维度上进行评估的,即放松、Hedonics和Arousal,在之前的研究中被假设为视觉美学的基础。结果表明,在两个实验中,这些行为判断都没有作为视觉体验的函数而发生显著变化。然而,无论视觉体验如何,在所有这些行为判断中,光滑或柔软的身体水平都存在显著差异。通常,2D平滑度或3D柔软度的辨别与物理平滑度或柔软度的水平成比例。其次,与粗糙或较硬的触觉刺激相比,更平滑或较软的触觉刺激是优选的。第三,视觉美学的三维情感结构似乎是畸形的,适用于触觉美学。然而,对情感维度上的美学轮廓的分析揭示了光滑和柔软的欣赏形式之间的一些显著差异,揭示了触觉美学新生领域中意想不到的亚结构。虽然身体上较软的3D刺激在所有三个情感维度上都获得了更高的排名,但身体上较平滑的2D刺激在放松和享乐维度上获得了较高的排名,而在唤醒维度上获得的排名较低。此外,在柔软度/硬度的所有物理水平上,松弛度和Hedonics的排名准确地相互重叠,但在光滑度/粗糙度的物理水平上却没有。这些发现表明,物理纹理参数不仅影响基本的触觉辨别,而且不同地调节触觉偏好和审美。讨论了这些新发现的理论和实践意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信