Multispecies sustainability

IF 4.6 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Christoph D. D. Rupprecht, J. Vervoort, Chr. Berthelsen, A. Mangnus, N. Osborne, K. Thompson, A. F. Urushima, Maya Kóvskaya, M. Spiegelberg, S. Cristiano, Jay Springett, B. Marschuetz, E. Flies, Steven R. McGreevy, L. Droz, M. Breed, Jingchao Gan, Rika Shinkai, A. Kawai
{"title":"Multispecies sustainability","authors":"Christoph D. D. Rupprecht, J. Vervoort, Chr. Berthelsen, A. Mangnus, N. Osborne, K. Thompson, A. F. Urushima, Maya Kóvskaya, M. Spiegelberg, S. Cristiano, Jay Springett, B. Marschuetz, E. Flies, Steven R. McGreevy, L. Droz, M. Breed, Jingchao Gan, Rika Shinkai, A. Kawai","doi":"10.1017/sus.2020.28","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Non-technical summary The sustainability concept seeks to balance how present and future generations of humans meet their needs. But because nature is viewed only as a resource, sustainability fails to recognize that humans and other living beings depend on each other for their well-being. We therefore argue that true sustainability can only be achieved if the interdependent needs of all species of current and future generations are met, and propose calling this ‘multispecies sustainability’. We explore the concept through visualizations and scenarios, then consider how it might be applied through case studies involving bees and healthy green spaces. Technical summary The sustainability concept in its current form suffers from reductionism. The common interpretation of ‘meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs’ fails to explicitly recognize their interdependence with needs of current and future non-human generations. Here, we argue that the focus of sustainability on human well-being – a purely utilitarian view of nature as a resource for humanity – limits its conceptual and analytical power, as well as real-world sustainability transformation efforts. We propose a broadened concept of ‘multispecies sustainability’ by acknowledging interdependent needs of multiple species’ current and future generations. We develop the concept in three steps: (1) discussing normative aspects, fundamental principles underlying the concept, and potential visual models, (2) showcasing radically diverging futures emerging from a scenario thought experiment based on the axes sustainable-unsustainable and multispecies-anthropocentric, and (3) exploring how multispecies sustainability can be applied to research and policy-making through two case studies (a multispecies stakeholder framework and the Healthy Urban Microbiome Initiative). Social media summary A new multispecies definition of sustainability recognizes that living beings and their wellbeing are interdependent.","PeriodicalId":36849,"journal":{"name":"Global Sustainability","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1017/sus.2020.28","citationCount":"28","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Sustainability","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/sus.2020.28","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

Abstract

Non-technical summary The sustainability concept seeks to balance how present and future generations of humans meet their needs. But because nature is viewed only as a resource, sustainability fails to recognize that humans and other living beings depend on each other for their well-being. We therefore argue that true sustainability can only be achieved if the interdependent needs of all species of current and future generations are met, and propose calling this ‘multispecies sustainability’. We explore the concept through visualizations and scenarios, then consider how it might be applied through case studies involving bees and healthy green spaces. Technical summary The sustainability concept in its current form suffers from reductionism. The common interpretation of ‘meeting the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs’ fails to explicitly recognize their interdependence with needs of current and future non-human generations. Here, we argue that the focus of sustainability on human well-being – a purely utilitarian view of nature as a resource for humanity – limits its conceptual and analytical power, as well as real-world sustainability transformation efforts. We propose a broadened concept of ‘multispecies sustainability’ by acknowledging interdependent needs of multiple species’ current and future generations. We develop the concept in three steps: (1) discussing normative aspects, fundamental principles underlying the concept, and potential visual models, (2) showcasing radically diverging futures emerging from a scenario thought experiment based on the axes sustainable-unsustainable and multispecies-anthropocentric, and (3) exploring how multispecies sustainability can be applied to research and policy-making through two case studies (a multispecies stakeholder framework and the Healthy Urban Microbiome Initiative). Social media summary A new multispecies definition of sustainability recognizes that living beings and their wellbeing are interdependent.
多物种可持续性
非技术性总结可持续性概念旨在平衡当代和子孙后代如何满足他们的需求。但由于自然只被视为一种资源,可持续发展没有认识到人类和其他生物的福祉是相互依赖的。因此,我们认为,只有满足当代和后代所有物种相互依存的需求,才能实现真正的可持续性,并建议将其称为“多物种可持续性”。我们通过可视化和场景来探索这个概念,然后考虑如何通过涉及蜜蜂和健康绿地的案例研究来应用它。技术摘要当前形式的可持续性概念受到还原论的影响。“在不损害后代满足自身需求的能力的情况下满足当代人的需求”的普遍解释未能明确认识到他们与当代和未来非人类世代的需求的相互依存性。在这里,我们认为,可持续性对人类福祉的关注——将自然视为人类资源的纯粹功利主义观点——限制了其概念和分析能力,以及现实世界的可持续性转型努力。我们提出了一个更广泛的“多物种可持续性”概念,承认多物种当前和未来世代的相互依存需求。我们分三个步骤发展这一概念:(1)讨论规范方面、概念的基本原则和潜在的视觉模型;(2)展示基于可持续、不可持续和多物种人类中心轴的情景思维实验所产生的截然不同的未来,(3)通过两个案例研究(多物种利益攸关方框架和健康城市微生物组倡议),探讨如何将多物种可持续性应用于研究和决策。社交媒体摘要可持续性的一个新的多物种定义认识到,生命及其福祉是相互依存的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Global Sustainability
Global Sustainability Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
3.60%
发文量
19
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信