Use of another Driver or other form of Transport by People of an Advanced Age

Jacqueline Beaton, Martin Connolly, N. Kerse
{"title":"Use of another Driver or other form of Transport by People of an Advanced Age","authors":"Jacqueline Beaton, Martin Connolly, N. Kerse","doi":"10.22158/sssr.v3n2p203","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: A comparable number of advanced aged New Zealand Maori and non-Maori are presently driven by someone else or use other forms of transport.Method: Everyday Interests and Activities – Transport subsection of the LiLAC study provided the question area for analysis. Enquiry focused on whether older people did use private car transport driven by someone else, were questioned who was their most regular driver, how often did someone else drive them in a typical week and what distance they drove in a typical journey, whether they had used other forms of transportation, if they had problems obtaining their groceries and did they provide transport in the form of car/assistance for others Methods of analysis included binomial logistic regression, chi-square test for association, ordinal logistic regression, Mann-Whitney U test and descriptive analysis.Results: Participants totaled 931 with 421 New Zealand Maori and 510 New Zealand Maori non-Maori.New Zealand Maori: A higher ratio of New Zealand Maori males were transported making use of their daughter. Most of such trips were made only once a week with more males travelling between 1.5-20.5 kilometres, while both males and females covered longer distances of 25.5-80+ kilometres. New Zealand Maori were not seen to have not made use of other forms of transport in the last twelve months and very rarely had any problem obtaining their groceries. New Zealand Maori females aided other members of the family, while New Zealand Maori males provided such a service to people outside of their family.New Zealand non-Maori: Similarly, New Zealand non-Maori males were also seen to have made greater use of private transport provided by their daughter. In comparison there was almost a 50:50 split between those New Zealand non-Maori females who did and those who did-not make use of such a service. Of those who did such a service was primarily provided by their spouse followed by their daughter. Like New Zealand Maori, non-Maori New Zealanders generally only made use of such transport once a week or not at all. Trips taken by either male and female New Zealand non-Maori was firstly between 1.5-8, and then between 8.2-20.5 kilometres. More New Zealand non-Maori males had use of other forms of transport; while again there was practically a 50:50 split between those females who did and those who did not. Like New Zealand Maori, New Zealand non-Maori male and female very rarely had any problem obtaining their groceries. Both New Zealand non-Maori males and females were seen to provide care/assistance for that outside of the family. Conclusion: Although as is often expected the majority both New Zealand Maori and New Zealand non-Maori representatives were seen to utilise family (daughters and spouse) for transportation. However, use of such a provision was generally restricted to only once a week and in assessing distance, consideration also needs to be made of respondent geographical location, especially in line with placement of main services. However, despite the use of such a transportation facility independent mobility remained with both rural and urban population groups. Future older generations will have experienced a closer relationship with motor vehicle use. Consequently, any transportation policy needs to be designed in line with sustaining the provision of goods, services, employment, social opportunities and membership of the community.","PeriodicalId":74882,"journal":{"name":"Studies in social science research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studies in social science research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22158/sssr.v3n2p203","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: A comparable number of advanced aged New Zealand Maori and non-Maori are presently driven by someone else or use other forms of transport.Method: Everyday Interests and Activities – Transport subsection of the LiLAC study provided the question area for analysis. Enquiry focused on whether older people did use private car transport driven by someone else, were questioned who was their most regular driver, how often did someone else drive them in a typical week and what distance they drove in a typical journey, whether they had used other forms of transportation, if they had problems obtaining their groceries and did they provide transport in the form of car/assistance for others Methods of analysis included binomial logistic regression, chi-square test for association, ordinal logistic regression, Mann-Whitney U test and descriptive analysis.Results: Participants totaled 931 with 421 New Zealand Maori and 510 New Zealand Maori non-Maori.New Zealand Maori: A higher ratio of New Zealand Maori males were transported making use of their daughter. Most of such trips were made only once a week with more males travelling between 1.5-20.5 kilometres, while both males and females covered longer distances of 25.5-80+ kilometres. New Zealand Maori were not seen to have not made use of other forms of transport in the last twelve months and very rarely had any problem obtaining their groceries. New Zealand Maori females aided other members of the family, while New Zealand Maori males provided such a service to people outside of their family.New Zealand non-Maori: Similarly, New Zealand non-Maori males were also seen to have made greater use of private transport provided by their daughter. In comparison there was almost a 50:50 split between those New Zealand non-Maori females who did and those who did-not make use of such a service. Of those who did such a service was primarily provided by their spouse followed by their daughter. Like New Zealand Maori, non-Maori New Zealanders generally only made use of such transport once a week or not at all. Trips taken by either male and female New Zealand non-Maori was firstly between 1.5-8, and then between 8.2-20.5 kilometres. More New Zealand non-Maori males had use of other forms of transport; while again there was practically a 50:50 split between those females who did and those who did not. Like New Zealand Maori, New Zealand non-Maori male and female very rarely had any problem obtaining their groceries. Both New Zealand non-Maori males and females were seen to provide care/assistance for that outside of the family. Conclusion: Although as is often expected the majority both New Zealand Maori and New Zealand non-Maori representatives were seen to utilise family (daughters and spouse) for transportation. However, use of such a provision was generally restricted to only once a week and in assessing distance, consideration also needs to be made of respondent geographical location, especially in line with placement of main services. However, despite the use of such a transportation facility independent mobility remained with both rural and urban population groups. Future older generations will have experienced a closer relationship with motor vehicle use. Consequently, any transportation policy needs to be designed in line with sustaining the provision of goods, services, employment, social opportunities and membership of the community.
高龄人士使用其他司机或其他交通工具
背景:目前有相当数量的新西兰毛利人和非毛利人老人由他人驾驶或使用其他交通工具。方法:LiLAC研究的日常兴趣和活动-交通部分提供了分析的问题区域。调查的重点是老年人是否使用别人开的私家车,被问及谁是他们最经常的司机,在一个典型的一周内别人开车给他们开的频率,他们在一个典型的旅程中开车的距离,他们是否使用过其他形式的交通工具,如果他们在获取杂货方面有问题,他们是否以汽车/帮助的形式为他人提供交通工具。关联卡方检验、有序logistic回归、Mann-Whitney U检验和描述性分析。结果:参与者共931人,其中421人为新西兰毛利人,510人为新西兰毛利人,非毛利人。新西兰毛利人:新西兰毛利人男性利用他们的女儿进行运输的比例较高。大多数这样的旅行一周只进行一次,男性的旅行距离在1.5-20.5公里之间,而男性和女性的旅行距离都更长,为25.5-80多公里。在过去12个月里,新西兰毛利人没有不使用其他交通工具的,他们很少在获得食品杂货方面遇到任何问题。新西兰毛利人女性帮助家庭的其他成员,而新西兰毛利人男性则为家庭以外的人提供这种服务。新西兰非毛利人:同样,新西兰非毛利人男性也更多地使用其女儿提供的私人交通工具。相比之下,新西兰非毛利女性使用和不使用这种服务的比例几乎是50:50。那些提供这种服务的人主要是由他们的配偶提供的,其次是他们的女儿。与新西兰毛利人一样,非毛利人的新西兰人一般每周只乘坐一次这种交通工具,或者根本不乘坐。新西兰男性和女性非毛利人的行程最初在1.5-8公里之间,然后在8.2-20.5公里之间。更多的新西兰非毛利人男性使用其他形式的交通工具;而在那些做了和没有做的女性中,几乎是50:50的比例。和新西兰的毛利人一样,新西兰的非毛利人男性和女性在获得食品杂货方面很少遇到任何问题。新西兰的非毛利人男性和女性都为家庭以外的人提供照顾/援助。结论:虽然正如人们经常预期的那样,大多数新西兰毛利人和新西兰非毛利人代表都是利用家人(女儿和配偶)的交通工具。但是,这种规定一般只限于每周使用一次,在评估距离时,还需要考虑到答复人的地理位置,特别是根据主要服务的地点。然而,尽管使用了这种运输设施,农村和城市人口群体仍然有独立的流动性。未来的老一辈人将会体验到与机动车使用的密切关系。因此,任何运输政策的设计都必须符合持续提供货物、服务、就业、社会机会和社区成员的要求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信