Does Activity of White-Tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus) Vary between Human-Hunted Areas and Refugia?

Dylan M. Osterhaus, William E. Jensen
{"title":"Does Activity of White-Tailed Deer (Odocoileus virginianus) Vary between Human-Hunted Areas and Refugia?","authors":"Dylan M. Osterhaus, William E. Jensen","doi":"10.1660/062.122.0306","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Hunting by humans impacts behaviors of targeted species, similar to what is observed in other predator-prey systems. Managed wildlife areas commonly have refuges where hunting is prohibited. Deer (family Cervidae) are commonly hunted species and their behavior might differ between such refuges and areas outside refuges where deer hunting is permitted. We predicted that white-tailed deer detections would be higher in refuges than in hunted areas as populations seek refugia from hunting, and that detections would be greatest at night in hunted vs. refuge areas. Using camera traps in refuge and hunted areas on two public wildlife areas in eastern Kansas, we calculated detections of individual deer per hour and categorized days into four time periods (dawn, day, dusk, night). Detection rates of deer overall (sexes pooled) did not vary significantly between refuges and hunted areas. Unexpectedly, male detection rates were higher in hunted areas than refuges. Differences in deer detection rates among time periods were marginally significant for deer overall with detection rates being higher during dawn than daytime, apparently driven by activity of females (as males showed no significant pattern). Sizes of the refuges in our study might not have been large enough to negate the effects of hunting pressure on deer behavior. Despite standardization of habitat characteristics, habitat differences between refuge and hunted areas may have also affected deer behavior. It is also possible that hunting pressure during our study (18 October – 15 November 2018) was not high enough to alter deer behavior. Future study is warranted to account for these variables.","PeriodicalId":76755,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science. Kansas Academy of Science","volume":"122 1","pages":"235 - 242"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the Kansas Academy of Science. Kansas Academy of Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1660/062.122.0306","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Hunting by humans impacts behaviors of targeted species, similar to what is observed in other predator-prey systems. Managed wildlife areas commonly have refuges where hunting is prohibited. Deer (family Cervidae) are commonly hunted species and their behavior might differ between such refuges and areas outside refuges where deer hunting is permitted. We predicted that white-tailed deer detections would be higher in refuges than in hunted areas as populations seek refugia from hunting, and that detections would be greatest at night in hunted vs. refuge areas. Using camera traps in refuge and hunted areas on two public wildlife areas in eastern Kansas, we calculated detections of individual deer per hour and categorized days into four time periods (dawn, day, dusk, night). Detection rates of deer overall (sexes pooled) did not vary significantly between refuges and hunted areas. Unexpectedly, male detection rates were higher in hunted areas than refuges. Differences in deer detection rates among time periods were marginally significant for deer overall with detection rates being higher during dawn than daytime, apparently driven by activity of females (as males showed no significant pattern). Sizes of the refuges in our study might not have been large enough to negate the effects of hunting pressure on deer behavior. Despite standardization of habitat characteristics, habitat differences between refuge and hunted areas may have also affected deer behavior. It is also possible that hunting pressure during our study (18 October – 15 November 2018) was not high enough to alter deer behavior. Future study is warranted to account for these variables.
白尾鹿的活动是否因人类狩猎区和避难所而异?
人类狩猎会影响目标物种的行为,类似于在其他捕食者-猎物系统中观察到的情况。野生动物管理区通常有禁止狩猎的避难所。鹿(鹿科)是常见的狩猎物种,它们的行为可能在这些保护区和允许猎鹿的保护区以外的地区有所不同。我们预测,随着种群从狩猎中寻求庇护,在避难所中白尾鹿的检测率将高于在狩猎区,而在狩猎区与避难区的夜间检测率将最高。利用堪萨斯州东部两个公共野生动物区的避难区和狩猎区的相机陷阱,我们计算了每小时对鹿个体的检测,并将日子分为四个时间段(黎明、白天、黄昏、夜晚)。鹿的总体检测率(性别汇总)在避难所和狩猎区之间没有显著差异。出乎意料的是,狩猎区的男性发现率高于避难所。鹿的检测率在不同时间段之间的差异总体上略为显著,黎明时的检测率高于白天,这显然是由雌性的活动驱动的(因为雄性没有表现出显著的模式)。我们研究中的避难所规模可能不够大,无法抵消狩猎压力对鹿行为的影响。尽管栖息地特征标准化,但避难区和狩猎区之间的栖息地差异也可能影响鹿的行为。也有可能在我们的研究期间(2018年10月18日至11月15日),狩猎压力不足以改变鹿的行为。未来的研究需要考虑这些变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信