Cannabinoid-based medicines in clinical care of chronic non-cancer pain: an analysis of pain mechanism and cannabinoid profile

Q4 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
Lucile Rapin, M. Arboleda, Erin Prosk, C. Su, A. Watier, M. Dworkind
{"title":"Cannabinoid-based medicines in clinical care of chronic non-cancer pain: an analysis of pain mechanism and cannabinoid profile","authors":"Lucile Rapin, M. Arboleda, Erin Prosk, C. Su, A. Watier, M. Dworkind","doi":"10.37349/emed.2023.00148","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Among treatments for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP), cannabinoid-based medicines (CBMs) have become extremely popular. Evidence remains modest and limited primarily to delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) for neuropathic pain; nevertheless, the use of various CBMs, including cannabidiol (CBD) to treat neuropathic, nociceptive, and mixed pain has increased globally. This observational case-series assessed the impact of CBMs as a complementary treatment by pain mechanism and cannabinoid profile over three months.\nMethods: An analysis of patients with CNCP and treated with CBMs who consented to an ongoing registry was performed. Outcomes were patient-reported such as the Edmonton symptom assessment system-revised, brief pain inventory-short form, and 36-item short form health survey. Data from patients with complete outcomes for baseline and 3-month follow-up was extracted. Characteristics of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), including a description of the suspected product were also assessed.\nResults: A total of 495 patients were part of this analysis (mean age = 56 years old; 67% women). At 3-month, the proportional use of THC:CBD balanced and THC-dominant products increased. Patients with neuropathic pain had higher pain-severity scores vs. nociceptive pain. In addition to patients with neuropathic pain, patients with nociceptive and mixed pain also reported improvements in pain severity and secondary symptoms such as anxiety, depression, drowsiness, fatigue, sleep disturbances, and overall, health-related quality of life. THC-dominant treatment is more likely to be recommended when pain is severe, whereas CBD-dominant is favored for less severe cases. ADRs were more frequent among cannabis-naive patients and included dizziness, headache, and somnolence among others. \nConclusions: Findings suggest that CBMs can be effective for neuropathic as well as nociceptive and mixed pain. THC is more frequently recommended for neuropathic and severe pain. Future research on CBMs in pain management must include details of CBM composition, and pain mechanism and must consider potential ADRs.","PeriodicalId":72999,"journal":{"name":"Exploration of medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Exploration of medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37349/emed.2023.00148","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: Among treatments for chronic non-cancer pain (CNCP), cannabinoid-based medicines (CBMs) have become extremely popular. Evidence remains modest and limited primarily to delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) for neuropathic pain; nevertheless, the use of various CBMs, including cannabidiol (CBD) to treat neuropathic, nociceptive, and mixed pain has increased globally. This observational case-series assessed the impact of CBMs as a complementary treatment by pain mechanism and cannabinoid profile over three months. Methods: An analysis of patients with CNCP and treated with CBMs who consented to an ongoing registry was performed. Outcomes were patient-reported such as the Edmonton symptom assessment system-revised, brief pain inventory-short form, and 36-item short form health survey. Data from patients with complete outcomes for baseline and 3-month follow-up was extracted. Characteristics of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), including a description of the suspected product were also assessed. Results: A total of 495 patients were part of this analysis (mean age = 56 years old; 67% women). At 3-month, the proportional use of THC:CBD balanced and THC-dominant products increased. Patients with neuropathic pain had higher pain-severity scores vs. nociceptive pain. In addition to patients with neuropathic pain, patients with nociceptive and mixed pain also reported improvements in pain severity and secondary symptoms such as anxiety, depression, drowsiness, fatigue, sleep disturbances, and overall, health-related quality of life. THC-dominant treatment is more likely to be recommended when pain is severe, whereas CBD-dominant is favored for less severe cases. ADRs were more frequent among cannabis-naive patients and included dizziness, headache, and somnolence among others. Conclusions: Findings suggest that CBMs can be effective for neuropathic as well as nociceptive and mixed pain. THC is more frequently recommended for neuropathic and severe pain. Future research on CBMs in pain management must include details of CBM composition, and pain mechanism and must consider potential ADRs.
大麻素类药物用于慢性非癌性疼痛的临床治疗:疼痛机制和大麻素概况分析
目的:在慢性非癌性疼痛(CNCP)的治疗中,大麻素类药物(CBM)已经变得非常流行。证据仍然有限,主要局限于δ-9-四氢大麻酚(THC)治疗神经性疼痛;然而,包括大麻二酚(CBD)在内的各种CBM在全球范围内用于治疗神经性、伤害性和混合性疼痛的情况有所增加。这一观察性病例系列通过疼痛机制和大麻素特征在三个月内评估了CBM作为一种补充治疗的影响。方法:对同意进行登记的CNCP患者和接受CBM治疗的患者进行分析。结果是患者报告的,如修订的埃德蒙顿症状评估系统、简短的疼痛清单和36项简短的健康调查。从基线和3个月随访的完全结果患者中提取数据。还评估了药物不良反应(ADR)的特征,包括可疑产品的描述。结果:共有495名患者参与了该分析(平均年龄=56岁;67%为女性)。在3个月时,四氢大麻酚的比例使用:CBD平衡和四氢大麻醚占主导地位的产品增加。与伤害性疼痛相比,神经性疼痛患者的疼痛严重程度评分更高。除了神经性疼痛患者外,伤害性疼痛和混合性疼痛患者的疼痛严重程度和次要症状(如焦虑、抑郁、嗜睡、疲劳、睡眠障碍)也有所改善,总体而言,与健康相关的生活质量也有所改善。当疼痛严重时,更可能推荐以四氢大麻酚为主的治疗,而CBD为主的治疗则适用于不太严重的病例。不良反应在未吸食大麻的患者中更为常见,包括头晕、头痛和嗜睡等。结论:研究结果表明CBMs对神经性疼痛、伤害性疼痛和混合性疼痛都有效。THC更经常被推荐用于神经性和严重疼痛。未来对CBM在疼痛管理中的研究必须包括CBM成分和疼痛机制的细节,并且必须考虑潜在的ADR。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信