Development of the Department of Veterans Affairs Centers of Excellence in Primary Care Education Trainee Participant Survey: Measuring Trainees’ Perceptions of an Interprofessional Education Curriculum

Journal of research in interprofessional practice and education Pub Date : 2021-05-31 DOI:10.22230/JRIPE.2021V11N1A315

J. Davila, S. Sansgiry, K. Rugen, S. Rajashekara, Samuel King, A. Amspoker, R. Tivis, A. Poppe, N. Harada, S. Gilman

{"title":"Development of the Department of Veterans Affairs Centers of Excellence in Primary Care Education Trainee Participant Survey: Measuring Trainees’ Perceptions of an Interprofessional Education Curriculum","authors":"J. Davila, S. Sansgiry, K. Rugen, S. Rajashekara, Samuel King, A. Amspoker, R. Tivis, A. Poppe, N. Harada, S. Gilman","doi":"10.22230/JRIPE.2021V11N1A315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The Trainee Participant Survey was developed for the evaluation of the Department of Veterans Affairs, Centers of Excellence in Primary Care Education (VA CoEPCE), which developed and delivered an interprofessional education (IPE) postgraduate curriculum to learners of multiple professions at seven geographically diverse VA facilities across the United States.Methods and findings: Perceptions of the curriculum by learners across professions were assessed to identify differences in curricular perceptions and unmet needs to inform programmatic changes. The comparison of responses by profession revealed no statistically significant differences across the core domains; precepting, supervising, mentoring; or program practices. Trainee professions differed significantly on satisfaction and system impacts.Conclusion: The Trainee Participant Survey has excellent psychometric properties and can serve as a model for evaluating future IPE programs.","PeriodicalId":89817,"journal":{"name":"Journal of research in interprofessional practice and education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of research in interprofessional practice and education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22230/JRIPE.2021V11N1A315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: The Trainee Participant Survey was developed for the evaluation of the Department of Veterans Affairs, Centers of Excellence in Primary Care Education (VA CoEPCE), which developed and delivered an interprofessional education (IPE) postgraduate curriculum to learners of multiple professions at seven geographically diverse VA facilities across the United States.Methods and findings: Perceptions of the curriculum by learners across professions were assessed to identify differences in curricular perceptions and unmet needs to inform programmatic changes. The comparison of responses by profession revealed no statistically significant differences across the core domains; precepting, supervising, mentoring; or program practices. Trainee professions differed significantly on satisfaction and system impacts.Conclusion: The Trainee Participant Survey has excellent psychometric properties and can serve as a model for evaluating future IPE programs.

查看原文本刊更多论文

退伍军人事务部初级保健教育卓越中心实习生参与者调查的发展:测量实习生对跨专业教育课程的看法

背景:实习生参与者调查是为评估退伍军人事务部初级保健教育卓越中心(VA CoEPCE)而开发的，该中心为美国七个地理位置不同的退伍军人事务部设施的多专业学习者开发并提供了跨专业教育(IPE)研究生课程。方法和发现:评估了不同专业的学习者对课程的看法，以确定课程看法的差异和未满足的需求，从而为课程改革提供信息。按专业划分的回答比较显示，核心领域之间没有统计学上的显著差异;训诫、监督、指导;或者程序实践。学员职业满意度和系统影响差异显著。结论:学员参与调查具有良好的心理测量特性，可作为未来IPE项目评估的模型。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

求助全文

约1分钟内获得全文求助全文

来源期刊

Journal of research in interprofessional practice and education

自引率

0.00%

发文量