{"title":"\"Almighty Dirt\": A Report on \"Caliban's Mirror: The 2022 Wilde and Joyce Symposium,\" Trinity College Dublin, 5-7 May 2022","authors":"James Green","doi":"10.1353/jjq.2022.0002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For the first time in around three years, I attended an in-person conference. Instead of an abrupt transition from the world of online symposia, this move into the reality of dear dirty Dublin felt, thankfully, smooth and natural. The first thing to say about “Caliban’s Mirror: The 2022 Wilde and Joyce Symposium” is that the conference could easily not have happened at all. Obstacles facing speakers included visa problems and an ongoing global pandemic, and panels as advertised on the website had to be changed as and when needs arose, calling for altruism from one attendee, Jinan Ashraf, who volunteered to move her paper on Joyce’s influence on Indian modernism to one of the final panels. That the conference went ahead at all is due to the heroic efforts of its organizers, Casey Lawrence and Graham Price, with assistance from Sam Slote, who managed to put it together while not being in the country, for example, and even picked up a dislocated knee right on the eve of the conference. The second thing to note is that, despite being the first conference to focus specifically on the connections between Oscar Wilde and James Joyce, it felt entirely right that such a comparison be made. In fact, multiple attendees noted almost immediately that it is surprising such a conference had not happened sooner. Joyce treated the topic of Wilde in his Trieste lecture “La Poetà di Salome” and his A Portrait echoes, at least in title, Wilde’s Picture of Dorian Gray. The two cultivated a dandyish public persona and foregrounded questions of aesthetics in their work. In light of the difficulties raised by the conference gods, all who attended remain grateful to the organizers and fate itself to allow us to talk about this subject at length. The conference also was marred by the shocking loss of John Paul Riquelme, who was due to give a fascinating paper on Wilde’s use of Platonic dialogues in his critical essays, echoed in Joyce’s “Scylla and Charybdis.” The abstract he submitted is available to view on the conference website, making it likely his final published work. Noting his generosity and enthusiasm, Graham and Casey fondly dedicated the conference to his memory. But his paper showed the richness and queerness of the comparisons to be made between these two bodies of work. On the first day, there was a panel on such queer comparisons: Michael F. Davis queered the complex genealogy of “The Dead” by looking at Wilde’s and Anatole France’s depictions of Judea in Salomé and The Procurator of Judea, Maureen de Leo considered Wilde’s and Joyce’s shared silences over homosexuality, while Tim Ziaukas and","PeriodicalId":42413,"journal":{"name":"JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JAMES JOYCE QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jjq.2022.0002","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, BRITISH ISLES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
For the first time in around three years, I attended an in-person conference. Instead of an abrupt transition from the world of online symposia, this move into the reality of dear dirty Dublin felt, thankfully, smooth and natural. The first thing to say about “Caliban’s Mirror: The 2022 Wilde and Joyce Symposium” is that the conference could easily not have happened at all. Obstacles facing speakers included visa problems and an ongoing global pandemic, and panels as advertised on the website had to be changed as and when needs arose, calling for altruism from one attendee, Jinan Ashraf, who volunteered to move her paper on Joyce’s influence on Indian modernism to one of the final panels. That the conference went ahead at all is due to the heroic efforts of its organizers, Casey Lawrence and Graham Price, with assistance from Sam Slote, who managed to put it together while not being in the country, for example, and even picked up a dislocated knee right on the eve of the conference. The second thing to note is that, despite being the first conference to focus specifically on the connections between Oscar Wilde and James Joyce, it felt entirely right that such a comparison be made. In fact, multiple attendees noted almost immediately that it is surprising such a conference had not happened sooner. Joyce treated the topic of Wilde in his Trieste lecture “La Poetà di Salome” and his A Portrait echoes, at least in title, Wilde’s Picture of Dorian Gray. The two cultivated a dandyish public persona and foregrounded questions of aesthetics in their work. In light of the difficulties raised by the conference gods, all who attended remain grateful to the organizers and fate itself to allow us to talk about this subject at length. The conference also was marred by the shocking loss of John Paul Riquelme, who was due to give a fascinating paper on Wilde’s use of Platonic dialogues in his critical essays, echoed in Joyce’s “Scylla and Charybdis.” The abstract he submitted is available to view on the conference website, making it likely his final published work. Noting his generosity and enthusiasm, Graham and Casey fondly dedicated the conference to his memory. But his paper showed the richness and queerness of the comparisons to be made between these two bodies of work. On the first day, there was a panel on such queer comparisons: Michael F. Davis queered the complex genealogy of “The Dead” by looking at Wilde’s and Anatole France’s depictions of Judea in Salomé and The Procurator of Judea, Maureen de Leo considered Wilde’s and Joyce’s shared silences over homosexuality, while Tim Ziaukas and
三年来,我第一次参加了一个面对面的会议。谢天谢地,这次从网上研讨会的世界突然过渡到亲爱的肮脏的都柏林的现实,感觉很顺利,很自然。关于“卡利班的镜子:2022年王尔德与乔伊斯研讨会”,首先要说的是,这个会议很可能根本就没有发生过。演讲者面临的障碍包括签证问题和正在进行的全球流行病,当需要出现时,网站上宣传的小组必须改变,这呼吁与会者济南·阿什拉夫(济南Ashraf)的利他主义精神,她自愿将她关于乔伊斯对印度现代主义影响的论文移到最后的小组之一。会议能够顺利举行,要归功于组织者凯西·劳伦斯(Casey Lawrence)和格雷厄姆·普莱斯(Graham Price)的英勇努力,以及萨姆·斯洛特(Sam Slote)的协助。例如,斯洛特在不在美国的情况下设法把会议组织起来,甚至在会议前夕治好了脱臼的膝盖。第二件需要注意的事情是,尽管这是第一次专门关注奥斯卡·王尔德和詹姆斯·乔伊斯之间联系的会议,但这样的比较感觉是完全正确的。事实上,许多与会者几乎立刻就指出,这样的会议没有更早召开是令人惊讶的。乔伊斯在他的里雅斯特演讲《莎乐美诗人》中谈到了王尔德的话题,他的《肖像》至少在标题上与王尔德的《多里安·格雷的画像》相呼应。两人塑造了一个时髦的公众形象,并在他们的作品中提出了美学问题。鉴于会议之神提出的困难,所有与会者仍然感谢组织者和命运本身,使我们能够详细地讨论这个问题。约翰·保罗·里克尔梅(John Paul Riquelme)的去世也给会议蒙上了一笔阴影。里克尔梅本来要发表一篇精彩的论文,讨论王尔德在评论文章中对柏拉图式对话的运用,乔伊斯的《锡拉与卡吕布狄斯》(Scylla and Charybdis)也有类似的内容。他提交的摘要可以在会议网站上查看,这可能是他发表的最后一篇论文。注意到他的慷慨和热情,格雷厄姆和凯西满怀深情地以这次会议纪念他。但他的论文显示了这两种工作之间的比较的丰富性和奇异性。第一天,有一个关于这种奇怪比较的小组讨论:迈克尔·f·戴维斯(Michael F. Davis)通过观察王尔德和阿纳托尔·弗朗斯(Anatole France)在《萨洛梅斯》(salom)和《犹太检察官》(the Procurator of Judea)中对犹太的描绘,使《死者》的复杂谱系变得奇怪;莫琳·德·里奥(Maureen de Leo)考虑了王尔德和乔伊斯在同性恋问题上的共同沉默
期刊介绍:
Founded in 1963 at the University of Tulsa by Thomas F. Staley, the James Joyce Quarterly has been the flagship journal of international Joyce studies ever since. In each issue, the JJQ brings together a wide array of critical and theoretical work focusing on the life, writing, and reception of James Joyce. We encourage submissions of all types, welcoming archival, historical, biographical, and critical research. Each issue of the JJQ provides a selection of peer-reviewed essays representing the very best in contemporary Joyce scholarship. In addition, the journal publishes notes, reviews, letters, a comprehensive checklist of recent Joyce-related publications, and the editor"s "Raising the Wind" comments.