The right to mine in a ‘protected area’ in South Africa: Mining and Environmental Justice Community Network of South Africa v Minister of Environmental Affairs

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q3 LAW
Clive Vinti
{"title":"The right to mine in a ‘protected area’ in South Africa: Mining and Environmental Justice Community Network of South Africa v Minister of Environmental Affairs","authors":"Clive Vinti","doi":"10.1080/02587203.2019.1662325","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This note assesses the right to mine in a ‘protected environment’ in South Africa within the prescripts of s 48 of the National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Act 57 of 2003 (NEMPAA). This issue will be evaluated through a critical analysis of the High Court decision in Mining and Environmental Justice Community Network of South Africa v Minister of Environmental Affairs (hereafter, MEJCON). At the outset, it is imperative to note that a ‘protected environment’ is a type of ‘protected area’. A ‘protected area’ is defined as a precisely demarcated geographical area regulated through legal and other mechanisms to guarantee the long-term protection of the environment and the concomitant ecosystem services and cultural values. However, NEMPAA does not clearly define the meaning of the term ‘protected area’. The Act merely states that a ‘protected area’ refers to ‘any of the protected areas’ stipulated in s 9 of NEMPAA. In this regard, s 9 of NEMPAA provides a list of the ‘kinds of protected areas’, including special nature reserves, national parks, nature reserves and protected environments. In essence, a ‘protected environment’ is used to, inter alia, ‘protect the area if the area is sensitive to development due to its biological diversity; natural characteristics; scientific; cultural; historical; archaeological or geological value and scenic and landscape value provision of environmental goods and services’. According to the NEMPAA, the Minister","PeriodicalId":44989,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal on Human Rights","volume":"35 1","pages":"311 - 322"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02587203.2019.1662325","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal on Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2019.1662325","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This note assesses the right to mine in a ‘protected environment’ in South Africa within the prescripts of s 48 of the National Environmental Management: Protected Areas Act 57 of 2003 (NEMPAA). This issue will be evaluated through a critical analysis of the High Court decision in Mining and Environmental Justice Community Network of South Africa v Minister of Environmental Affairs (hereafter, MEJCON). At the outset, it is imperative to note that a ‘protected environment’ is a type of ‘protected area’. A ‘protected area’ is defined as a precisely demarcated geographical area regulated through legal and other mechanisms to guarantee the long-term protection of the environment and the concomitant ecosystem services and cultural values. However, NEMPAA does not clearly define the meaning of the term ‘protected area’. The Act merely states that a ‘protected area’ refers to ‘any of the protected areas’ stipulated in s 9 of NEMPAA. In this regard, s 9 of NEMPAA provides a list of the ‘kinds of protected areas’, including special nature reserves, national parks, nature reserves and protected environments. In essence, a ‘protected environment’ is used to, inter alia, ‘protect the area if the area is sensitive to development due to its biological diversity; natural characteristics; scientific; cultural; historical; archaeological or geological value and scenic and landscape value provision of environmental goods and services’. According to the NEMPAA, the Minister
在南非“保护区”采矿的权利:南非采矿和环境司法社区网络诉环境事务部长
本说明根据2003年《国家环境管理:保护区法》第57号(NEMPAA)第48条的规定,评估了南非在“受保护环境”中采矿的权利。将通过对高等法院在南非采矿和环境司法社区网络诉环境事务部长案(以下简称MEJCON)中的裁决进行批判性分析来评估这一问题。首先,必须注意的是,“受保护环境”是一种“保护区”。“保护区”是指通过法律和其他机制进行管理,以保证长期保护环境以及随之而来的生态系统服务和文化价值的精确划定的地理区域。然而,NEMPAA并没有明确定义“保护区”一词的含义。该法案仅规定,“保护区”是指《国家环境保护法》第9条规定的“任何保护区”。在这方面,NEMPAA第9条提供了一份“保护区类型”清单,包括特殊自然保护区、国家公园、自然保护区和保护环境。从本质上讲,“受保护的环境”是用来“保护该地区,如果该地区因其生物多样性而对发展敏感;自然特征;科学的文化的历史的提供环境商品和服务的考古或地质价值以及风景和景观价值。根据NEMPAA,部长
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
77.80%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信