Re: The role of antenatal corticosteroids in improving neonatal outcomes

IF 1.2 Q3 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
P. Pathiraja, J. Rafi
{"title":"Re: The role of antenatal corticosteroids in improving neonatal outcomes","authors":"P. Pathiraja, J. Rafi","doi":"10.1111/tog.12796","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dear Editor, We read with interest the article by Busuulwa et al. addressing the role of antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) in improving neonatal outcomes. We would like to add a few interesting points from the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids (ALPS) study and recent meta-analysis evidence in support of the authors of the paper in being cautious about the use of ACS to improve neonatal outcomes in the context of late preterm deliveries (34–36 weeks’ gestation). Although late preterm deliveries account for approximately two-thirds of preterm infants, the recommendation for ACS for late pretermgestations has beenminimal,mainly because of the lack of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and the possibility of long-term neurological impact outweighing short-term benefit. The ALPS study was the principal trial published in the literature and showed short-term respiratory benefits. The hypoglycaemia cutoff used by the ALPS study was very low: <2.2 mmol/L (widely accepted level <2.6–4.0 mmol/L); this suggests that hypoglycaemia incidence may be more than the 24% quoted in the study for the group who received steroids. Of note, hypoglycaemia is an independent predictor of poor neurodevelopmental outcomes in neonates. A recent meta-analysis by Mangesh et al., which included seven RCTs, showed reduced need for respiratory support in the steroid category (relative risk 0.68), while neonatal hypoglycaemia risk was high. Interestingly, the recent paper by Badreldin et al. showed no respiratory benefit of ACS in late preterm deliveries. Another high-risk group is neonates of type 1 and type 2 diabetic pregnant mothers, who have a 48% risk of hypoglycaemia. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline on diabetes in prenancy recommends delivery between 37 and 38 weeks, with either induction of labour or caesarean section. Steroid administration before delivery is standard practice for caesarean sections before 38 weeks. Steroid administration in this group poses an additional risk of neonatal hypoglycaemia on top of the baseline risk of 48% in neonates of diabetic mothers. For clinicians, there is a clinical dilemma (respiratory benefits versus neonatal hypoglycaemia in caesarean delivery at less than 39 weeks) because neonatal hypoglycaemia is associated with developmental delay, seizures, visual processing problems and cognitive difficulties, as well as hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) and perinatal arterial ischemic stroke in the territory of the posterior cerebral artery. ACS in late preterm neonates therefore warrants cautious use until more RCTs on long-term outcomes can provide further recommendation.","PeriodicalId":51862,"journal":{"name":"Obstetrician & Gynaecologist","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-02-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Obstetrician & Gynaecologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/tog.12796","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Dear Editor, We read with interest the article by Busuulwa et al. addressing the role of antenatal corticosteroids (ACS) in improving neonatal outcomes. We would like to add a few interesting points from the Antenatal Late Preterm Steroids (ALPS) study and recent meta-analysis evidence in support of the authors of the paper in being cautious about the use of ACS to improve neonatal outcomes in the context of late preterm deliveries (34–36 weeks’ gestation). Although late preterm deliveries account for approximately two-thirds of preterm infants, the recommendation for ACS for late pretermgestations has beenminimal,mainly because of the lack of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and the possibility of long-term neurological impact outweighing short-term benefit. The ALPS study was the principal trial published in the literature and showed short-term respiratory benefits. The hypoglycaemia cutoff used by the ALPS study was very low: <2.2 mmol/L (widely accepted level <2.6–4.0 mmol/L); this suggests that hypoglycaemia incidence may be more than the 24% quoted in the study for the group who received steroids. Of note, hypoglycaemia is an independent predictor of poor neurodevelopmental outcomes in neonates. A recent meta-analysis by Mangesh et al., which included seven RCTs, showed reduced need for respiratory support in the steroid category (relative risk 0.68), while neonatal hypoglycaemia risk was high. Interestingly, the recent paper by Badreldin et al. showed no respiratory benefit of ACS in late preterm deliveries. Another high-risk group is neonates of type 1 and type 2 diabetic pregnant mothers, who have a 48% risk of hypoglycaemia. The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence guideline on diabetes in prenancy recommends delivery between 37 and 38 weeks, with either induction of labour or caesarean section. Steroid administration before delivery is standard practice for caesarean sections before 38 weeks. Steroid administration in this group poses an additional risk of neonatal hypoglycaemia on top of the baseline risk of 48% in neonates of diabetic mothers. For clinicians, there is a clinical dilemma (respiratory benefits versus neonatal hypoglycaemia in caesarean delivery at less than 39 weeks) because neonatal hypoglycaemia is associated with developmental delay, seizures, visual processing problems and cognitive difficulties, as well as hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy (HIE) and perinatal arterial ischemic stroke in the territory of the posterior cerebral artery. ACS in late preterm neonates therefore warrants cautious use until more RCTs on long-term outcomes can provide further recommendation.
回复:产前皮质类固醇在改善新生儿结局中的作用
亲爱的编辑,我们饶有兴趣地阅读了Busuulwa等人关于产前皮质类固醇(ACS)在改善新生儿结局中的作用的文章。我们想从产前晚期早产类固醇(ALPS)研究和最近的荟萃分析证据中补充一些有趣的观点,以支持论文作者对使用ACS改善晚期早产(妊娠34-36周)新生儿结局的谨慎态度。虽然晚期早产约占早产婴儿的三分之二,但晚期早产的ACS建议很少,主要是因为缺乏随机对照试验(rct)和长期神经影响超过短期效益的可能性。ALPS研究是文献中发表的主要试验,显示了短期呼吸益处。ALPS研究使用的低血糖临界值很低:<2.2 mmol/L(广泛接受的水平< 2.6-4.0 mmol/L);这表明,接受类固醇治疗组的低血糖发生率可能高于研究中引用的24%。值得注意的是,低血糖是新生儿神经发育不良的独立预测因子。Mangesh等人最近的一项荟萃分析,包括7项随机对照试验,显示类固醇类患者对呼吸支持的需求减少(相对风险0.68),而新生儿低血糖风险较高。有趣的是,Badreldin等人最近的一篇论文显示,ACS对晚期早产没有呼吸益处。另一个高危人群是1型和2型糖尿病孕妇的新生儿,她们有48%的低血糖风险。国家健康和护理卓越研究所关于妊娠糖尿病的指南建议在37至38周之间分娩,采用引产或剖腹产。分娩前给药类固醇是38周前剖腹产的标准做法。在这一组中,在糖尿病母亲的新生儿基线风险为48%的基础上,类固醇给药会增加新生儿低血糖的风险。对于临床医生来说,存在一个临床困境(呼吸益处与小于39周剖宫产新生儿低血糖相比),因为新生儿低血糖与发育迟缓、癫痫发作、视觉处理问题和认知困难,以及大脑后动脉区域的缺氧缺血性脑病(HIE)和围产期动脉缺血性中风有关。因此,在更多关于长期结果的随机对照试验提供进一步的建议之前,晚期早产儿的ACS需要谨慎使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Obstetrician & Gynaecologist
Obstetrician & Gynaecologist OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY-
自引率
7.10%
发文量
66
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信