Mental health and wellbeing at work in the UK: current legal approaches

IF 1 4区 社会学 Q2 LAW
Legal Studies Pub Date : 2022-04-07 DOI:10.1017/lst.2022.16
P. Almond, Rachel H Horton, Grace James
{"title":"Mental health and wellbeing at work in the UK: current legal approaches","authors":"P. Almond, Rachel H Horton, Grace James","doi":"10.1017/lst.2022.16","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In this paper we outline and critique legal approaches to poor mental health at work in the UK. We argue that the current legal framework is not ‘fit for purpose’. Overall, the existing framework promotes a problematic model that is ineffective because each element, individually and as part of the whole, fails to adequately engage with the nuanced realities of the relationship between undertaking paid work and suffering poor mental health. It is, we suggest, disjointed because it has evolved from a patchwork of provisions, each with different foundations, motivations, ambitions and flaws. The need for a re-focus, and what this might entail, is considered, and the capacity of a model centred on addressing workplace mental health as a manifestation of broader notions of vulnerability is explored.","PeriodicalId":46121,"journal":{"name":"Legal Studies","volume":"42 1","pages":"663 - 679"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Legal Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2022.16","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract In this paper we outline and critique legal approaches to poor mental health at work in the UK. We argue that the current legal framework is not ‘fit for purpose’. Overall, the existing framework promotes a problematic model that is ineffective because each element, individually and as part of the whole, fails to adequately engage with the nuanced realities of the relationship between undertaking paid work and suffering poor mental health. It is, we suggest, disjointed because it has evolved from a patchwork of provisions, each with different foundations, motivations, ambitions and flaws. The need for a re-focus, and what this might entail, is considered, and the capacity of a model centred on addressing workplace mental health as a manifestation of broader notions of vulnerability is explored.
英国工作中的心理健康和幸福感:当前的法律方法
摘要在本文中,我们概述并批评了英国应对工作中心理健康不佳的法律方法。我们认为目前的法律框架不“符合目的”。总的来说,现有的框架助长了一种有问题的模式,这种模式是无效的,因为每一个因素,无论是单独的还是作为整体的一部分,都未能充分参与从事有偿工作和心理健康状况不佳之间关系的微妙现实。我们认为,它是脱节的,因为它是由拼凑的条款演变而来的,每个条款都有不同的基础、动机、野心和缺陷。考虑到重新关注的必要性,以及这可能需要什么,并探讨了以解决工作场所心理健康为中心的模式的能力,将其作为更广泛的脆弱性概念的表现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信