Evaluation of detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 by chip-based real-time polymerase chain reaction test (truenat™ beta CoV) in multi-sample pools

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Venkata Polu, N. Kota, Deepthi Karumanchi, S. Basireddy, Sandhya Munagapati, Shivakumar Mugudalabetta, Venkata Ganta, U. Allam
{"title":"Evaluation of detection of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 by chip-based real-time polymerase chain reaction test (truenat™ beta CoV) in multi-sample pools","authors":"Venkata Polu, N. Kota, Deepthi Karumanchi, S. Basireddy, Sandhya Munagapati, Shivakumar Mugudalabetta, Venkata Ganta, U. Allam","doi":"10.4103/ijam.ijam_14_22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: Systematic testing for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) using molecular diagnostic tools to identify individuals with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection, and tracing their primary and secondary contacts is important to curb its spread. With resource limitations on testing individual samples, testing of pooled samples provides alternative approach to increase testing capacity. Present aimed at assessing the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in pooled samples using chip-based real-time polymerase chain reaction Test (Truenat™ Beta CoV). Materials and Methods: Pooled sample size of five was used from laboratory confirmed COVID-19 positive and negative samples. SARS-CoV-2 positive nasopharyngeal specimens of known samples from high, medium, low, and very low viral load were mixed with SARS-CoV-2 negative nasopharyngeal specimens of known samples in 1:4 ratio, followed by analysis using Truenat. Furthermore, each sample in that pool was tested individually. Pooled sample testing was also done on the samples of unknown status. Results: The results of the present study showed cycle threshold (Ct) values of pooled sample with SARS-CoV-2 positive RNA of high, medium, low, and very low viral load were 16.8, 24.22, 28.2, and 33.43, compared to Ct values of individual samples of 16.43, 22.0, 28.00, and 33.00, respectively. Conclusion: These results suggest that the Ct values of pooled samples were in agreement with Ct values of individual samples indicating the validity of pooled sample testing for screening SARS-CoV-2 using Truenat. The following core competencies are addressed in this article: Medical knowledge, Patient care and procedural skills systems-based practice, Practice-based learning and improvement.","PeriodicalId":36495,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Academic Medicine","volume":"8 1","pages":"123 - 130"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Academic Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/ijam.ijam_14_22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Systematic testing for Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) using molecular diagnostic tools to identify individuals with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) infection, and tracing their primary and secondary contacts is important to curb its spread. With resource limitations on testing individual samples, testing of pooled samples provides alternative approach to increase testing capacity. Present aimed at assessing the detection of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in pooled samples using chip-based real-time polymerase chain reaction Test (Truenat™ Beta CoV). Materials and Methods: Pooled sample size of five was used from laboratory confirmed COVID-19 positive and negative samples. SARS-CoV-2 positive nasopharyngeal specimens of known samples from high, medium, low, and very low viral load were mixed with SARS-CoV-2 negative nasopharyngeal specimens of known samples in 1:4 ratio, followed by analysis using Truenat. Furthermore, each sample in that pool was tested individually. Pooled sample testing was also done on the samples of unknown status. Results: The results of the present study showed cycle threshold (Ct) values of pooled sample with SARS-CoV-2 positive RNA of high, medium, low, and very low viral load were 16.8, 24.22, 28.2, and 33.43, compared to Ct values of individual samples of 16.43, 22.0, 28.00, and 33.00, respectively. Conclusion: These results suggest that the Ct values of pooled samples were in agreement with Ct values of individual samples indicating the validity of pooled sample testing for screening SARS-CoV-2 using Truenat. The following core competencies are addressed in this article: Medical knowledge, Patient care and procedural skills systems-based practice, Practice-based learning and improvement.
基于芯片的实时聚合酶链反应检测(truenat™beta CoV)在多样本池中检测严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2型的评价
利用分子诊断工具对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒-2 (SARS-CoV-2)进行系统检测,以识别2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)感染个体,并追踪其主要和次要接触者,对遏制其传播至关重要。由于测试单个样本的资源有限,测试池样本提供了增加测试能力的替代方法。本研究旨在利用基于芯片的实时聚合酶链反应测试(Truenat™Beta CoV)评估混合样本中SARS-CoV-2 RNA的检测。材料和方法:从实验室确诊的COVID-19阳性和阴性样本中抽取5份汇总样本量。将高、中、低、极低病毒载量的已知样本的SARS-CoV-2阳性鼻咽标本与已知样本的SARS-CoV-2阴性鼻咽标本按1:4的比例混合,用Truenat进行分析。此外,该池中的每个样本都进行了单独测试。对未知状态的样品也进行了混合样本测试。结果:高、中、低、极低病毒载量SARS-CoV-2阳性RNA合并样本的周期阈值(Ct)分别为16.8、24.22、28.2和33.43,而单个样本的Ct值分别为16.43、22.0、28.00和33.00。结论:合并样本的Ct值与个体样本的Ct值一致,表明合并样本检测在Truenat筛查SARS-CoV-2中的有效性。本文讨论了以下核心能力:医学知识,基于系统的患者护理和程序技能实践,基于实践的学习和改进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
International Journal of Academic Medicine
International Journal of Academic Medicine Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信