On Wasserstein distances, barycenters, and the cross-section methodology for proxy credit curves

IF 0.6 Q4 BUSINESS, FINANCE
Matteo Michielon, A. Khedher, P. Spreij
{"title":"On Wasserstein distances, barycenters, and the cross-section methodology for proxy credit curves","authors":"Matteo Michielon, A. Khedher, P. Spreij","doi":"10.1142/s2424786322500372","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The credit default swap (CDS) market plays an important role for financial institutions. This is not only for their trading activities, but also as it provides a source of information to extract default probabilities to be used for (counterparty) credit risk purposes, as for instance in credit valuation adjustment calculations. Nonetheless, the number of entities for which liquid single-name CDSs are traded is of the order of a few thousands. This requires financial institutions to employ proxy methodologies to estimate the credit risk they face when trading with counterparties for which no (liquid) CDSs are available in the market. In this paper, we propose and compare different approaches to take into account counterparty-specific information in terms of rating, region, sector, etc. at cross-sectional level to strip risk-neutral default probabilities from CDSs. This is achieved by taking into account the intrinsic probabilistic information characterizing each CDS by means of suitably-defined Wasserstein distances and barycenters. The results suggest that default probabilities are likely to be overestimated if the construction of the proxy credit curves overlooks the probability structure underlying the CDS market, potentially resulting in a too conservative counterparty credit risk pricing framework.","PeriodicalId":54088,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Financial Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Financial Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2424786322500372","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The credit default swap (CDS) market plays an important role for financial institutions. This is not only for their trading activities, but also as it provides a source of information to extract default probabilities to be used for (counterparty) credit risk purposes, as for instance in credit valuation adjustment calculations. Nonetheless, the number of entities for which liquid single-name CDSs are traded is of the order of a few thousands. This requires financial institutions to employ proxy methodologies to estimate the credit risk they face when trading with counterparties for which no (liquid) CDSs are available in the market. In this paper, we propose and compare different approaches to take into account counterparty-specific information in terms of rating, region, sector, etc. at cross-sectional level to strip risk-neutral default probabilities from CDSs. This is achieved by taking into account the intrinsic probabilistic information characterizing each CDS by means of suitably-defined Wasserstein distances and barycenters. The results suggest that default probabilities are likely to be overestimated if the construction of the proxy credit curves overlooks the probability structure underlying the CDS market, potentially resulting in a too conservative counterparty credit risk pricing framework.
关于Wasserstein距离、重心和代理信用曲线的截面方法
信用违约互换(CDS)市场对金融机构起着重要作用。这不仅适用于他们的交易活动,还因为它提供了一个信息来源,用于提取违约概率,用于(交易对手)信用风险目的,例如在信用估值调整计算中。尽管如此,交易流动性单名CDS的实体数量约为数千家。这要求金融机构在与市场上没有(流动)CDS的交易对手进行交易时,采用代理方法来估计其面临的信贷风险。在本文中,我们提出并比较了不同的方法,以在横截面水平上考虑评级、地区、行业等方面的交易对手特定信息,从而从CDS中剥离风险中性违约概率。这是通过考虑通过适当定义的Wasserstein距离和重心表征每个CDS的固有概率信息来实现的。研究结果表明,如果代理信用曲线的构建忽视了CDS市场的概率结构,可能会导致交易对手信用风险定价框架过于保守,那么违约概率可能会被高估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信