Evaluation of medication errors with implementation of electronic health record technology in the medical intensive care unit

IF 1.4 Q4 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Vivian Liao, M. Rabinovich, P. Abraham, S. Perez, Christiana DiPlotti, Jenny E. Han, G. Martin, E. Honig
{"title":"Evaluation of medication errors with implementation of electronic health record technology in the medical intensive care unit","authors":"Vivian Liao, M. Rabinovich, P. Abraham, S. Perez, Christiana DiPlotti, Jenny E. Han, G. Martin, E. Honig","doi":"10.2147/OAJCT.S131211","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) are at an increased risk for medication errors (MEs) and adverse drug events from multifactorial causes. ME rate ranges from 1.2 to 947 per 1,000 patient days in the medical ICU (MICU). Studies with the implementation of electronic health records (EHR) have concluded that it significantly reduced overall prescribing errors and the number of errors that caused patient harm decreased. However, other types of errors, such as wrong dose and omission of required medications increased after EHR implementation. We sought to compare the number of MEs before and after EHR implementation in the MICU, with additional evaluation of error severity. Patients and methods: Prospective, observational, quality improvement study of all patients admitted to a single MICU service at an academic medical center. Patients were evaluated during four periods over 2 years: August–September 2010 (preimplementation; period I), January– February 2011 (2 months postimplementation; period II), August–September 2012 (21 months postimplementation; period III), and January–February 2013 (25 months postimplementation; period IV). All medication orders and administration records were reviewed by an ICU clinical pharmacist and ME was defined as a deviation from established standards for prescribing, dispensing, administering, or documenting medication. The frequency and classification of MEs were compared between groups by chi square; p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: There was a statistically significant increase in the number of MEs per 1,000 patient days during time periods II (N = 2,592; p < 0.001) and III (N = 2,388; p = 0.0023) compared to baseline (N = 1,972). However, over time there was a significant reduction in medication errors during period IV compared to baseline (N = 1,669; p = 0.0008). Conclusion: In the short-term, EHR did not lead to a reduction in medication errors in the ICU; however, there was a significant decrease in medication errors after 2 years.","PeriodicalId":19500,"journal":{"name":"Open Access Journal of Clinical Trials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2017-05-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.2147/OAJCT.S131211","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Access Journal of Clinical Trials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2147/OAJCT.S131211","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Purpose: Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) are at an increased risk for medication errors (MEs) and adverse drug events from multifactorial causes. ME rate ranges from 1.2 to 947 per 1,000 patient days in the medical ICU (MICU). Studies with the implementation of electronic health records (EHR) have concluded that it significantly reduced overall prescribing errors and the number of errors that caused patient harm decreased. However, other types of errors, such as wrong dose and omission of required medications increased after EHR implementation. We sought to compare the number of MEs before and after EHR implementation in the MICU, with additional evaluation of error severity. Patients and methods: Prospective, observational, quality improvement study of all patients admitted to a single MICU service at an academic medical center. Patients were evaluated during four periods over 2 years: August–September 2010 (preimplementation; period I), January– February 2011 (2 months postimplementation; period II), August–September 2012 (21 months postimplementation; period III), and January–February 2013 (25 months postimplementation; period IV). All medication orders and administration records were reviewed by an ICU clinical pharmacist and ME was defined as a deviation from established standards for prescribing, dispensing, administering, or documenting medication. The frequency and classification of MEs were compared between groups by chi square; p < 0.05 was considered significant. Results: There was a statistically significant increase in the number of MEs per 1,000 patient days during time periods II (N = 2,592; p < 0.001) and III (N = 2,388; p = 0.0023) compared to baseline (N = 1,972). However, over time there was a significant reduction in medication errors during period IV compared to baseline (N = 1,669; p = 0.0008). Conclusion: In the short-term, EHR did not lead to a reduction in medication errors in the ICU; however, there was a significant decrease in medication errors after 2 years.
电子健康记录技术在重症监护室应用中的用药错误评估
目的:重症监护室(ICU)的患者因多因素原因出现药物错误(ME)和药物不良事件的风险增加。重症监护室(MICU)的脑脊髓炎发病率为每1000个患者日1.2至947例。实施电子健康记录(EHR)的研究得出结论,它显著减少了总体处方错误,导致患者伤害的错误数量也减少了。然而,其他类型的错误,如错误的剂量和所需药物的遗漏,在EHR实施后增加。我们试图比较MICU实施EHR前后的ME数量,并对错误严重性进行额外评估。患者和方法:对在学术医疗中心接受单一MICU服务的所有患者进行前瞻性、观察性、质量改进研究。在2年内的四个时期对患者进行了评估:2010年8月至9月(实施前;第一期)、2011年1月至2月(实施后2个月;第二期)、2012年8月–9月(执行后21个月;III期)和2013年1月–2月(执行后25个月;IV期)。ICU临床药剂师对所有医嘱和给药记录进行了审查,ME被定义为偏离处方、配药、给药或记录药物的既定标准。采用卡方法比较各组脑脊髓炎的发生频率和分类;p<0.05被认为是显著的。结果:与基线(N=1972)相比,在时间段II(N=2592;p<0.001)和III(N=2388;p=0.0023)期间,每1000个患者日的脑脊髓炎数量在统计学上显著增加。然而,随着时间的推移,与基线相比,IV期的用药错误显著减少(N=1669;p=0.00008)。结论:在短期内,EHR并没有导致ICU的用药错误减少;然而,2年后用药失误明显减少。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Open Access Journal of Clinical Trials
Open Access Journal of Clinical Trials MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL-
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信